Advertisement

Benign Diseases of the Colon and Rectum: CT Colonography

  • Philippe Lefere
  • Stefaan Gryspeerdt

Abstract

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is established as the best alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC) for detecting polyps and tumoral lesions in the colon. In that way, it is an accepted modality after incomplete OC in patients with a contraindication for or who are unwilling to undergo OC [1]. Furthermore, CTC can be suggested for individual colorectal cancer screening and for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer in general [2]. Adequate training and experience are considered crucial for accurate polyp detection [3]. However, besides being a champion in polyp detection, it is also very important for the radiologist to be familiar with findings of benign colonic disease and findings mimicking disease (polyps and tumors), as this will significantly reduce false-positive findings and hence superfluous OC. This issue of false-positive findings at CTC should absolutely be reduced to a minimum to avoid patient anxiety and because of increased costs.

Keywords

Diverticular Disease Compute Tomography Colonography Optical Colonoscopy Polyp Detection Colonic Lumen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halligan S (2013) CT colonography for investigation of patients with symptoms potentially suggestive of colorectal cancer: a review of the UK SIGGAR trials. Br J Radiol 86:20130137.doi.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M et al (2013) The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 23: 720–729.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Endoscopic Classification Review Group (2005) Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 37:570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahnen DJ (2011) The American College of Gastroenterology Emily Couric Lecture—the adenoma-carcinoma sequence revisited: has the era of genetic tailoring finally arrived? Am J Gastroenterol 106:190–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Limketkai BN, Lam-Himlin D, Arnold CA et al (2013) The cutting edge of serrated polyps: a practical guide to approaching and managing serrated colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 77:360–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lefere P, Silva C, Gryspeerdt S et al (2013) Teleradiology based CT colonography to screen a population group of a remote island; at average risk for colorectal cancer. Eur J Radiol 82: e262–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2011) CT colonography: avoiding traps and pitfalls. Insights Imaging 2:57–68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mang T, Gryspeerdt S, Schima W et al (2013) Evaluation of colonic lesions and pitfalls in CT colonography: a systematic approach based on morphology, attenuation and mobility. Eur J Radiol 82:1177–1186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dachman AH, Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S et al (2007) CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 45:347–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silva AC, Beaty SD, Hara AK et al (2007) Spectrum of normal and abnormal CT appearances of the ileocecal valve and cecum with endoscopic and surgical correlation. Radiographics 27:1039–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA Jr et al (2003) Primary neoplasms of the appendix: radiologic spectrum of disease with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:645–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson EK, Arcila ME, Steele SR (2009) Appendiceal inversion: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. JSLS 13:92–95.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al (2003) Diverticular disease in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13 Suppl 4:L62–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P (2012) Chronic diverticulitis vs. colorectal cancer: findings on CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 37:1101–1109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Menias CO et al (2007) Evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine: part 1. Neoplasms. Radiographics 27:1681–1692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Taylor AJ (2008) Asymptomatic pneumatosis at CT colonography: a benign self-limited imaging finding distinct from perforation AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W112–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeong SY, Chung DJ, Myung Yeo D et al (2013) The usefulness of computed tomographic colonography for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:809–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mang T, Schima W (2013) Colorectal anastomoses. In: Mang T, Schima W (Eds) CT colonography: a guide for clinical practice. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Munipalle PC, Garud T, Light D (2013) Diaphragmatic disease of the colon: systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15:1063–1069.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Lefere
    • 1
  • Stefaan Gryspeerdt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyAZ DeltaRoeselareBelgium

Personalised recommendations