Renal Tumors

  • Lejla Aganovic
  • Richard H. Cohan


Here we review recent advances in renal mass imaging, primarily with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and discuss developments in the use of imaging for identifying renal masses, differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions, and assessing patients following renal mass treatment.


Partial Nephrectomy Renal Mass Small Renal Mass Nephrographic Phase Solid Renal Mass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M et al (1995) Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographicphase CT scans. Radiology 196:445–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ, O’Connor SD et al (2012) Renal cell carcinoma: attenuation values on unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1115–1120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hecht EM, Israel GM, Krinsky GA et al (2004) Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging. Radiology 232:373–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choyke PL (2003) Imaging of hereditary renal cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1037–1051.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA et al (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosniak MA (1986) The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 236:441–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farrelly C, Delaney H, McDermott R et al (2008) Do all non-calcified echogenic renal lesions found on ultrasound need further evaluation with CT? Abdominal Imaging 33:44–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davenport MS, Neville AM, Ellis JH et al (2011) Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with Hounsfield Unit thresholds: effect of size and region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 260:158–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E et al (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1868–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Israel GM, Bosniak MA, Slywotzky CM et al (2005) CT differentiation of large exophytic renal angiomyolipomas and perirenal liposarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:769–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV et al (2008) Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat? Radiology 247:738–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA et al (2009) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative attenuation pixels aid diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:438–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim JK, Kim HS, Jang YJ et al (2006) Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 239:274–280.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang YY, Luo S, Liu Y et al (2013) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT. Clin Radiol 68:365–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choudhary S, Rajesh A, Mayer NJ et al (2009) Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms. Clin Radiol 64:517–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young JR, Margolis D, Sauk S et al (2013) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology 267:444–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Tsai S et al (2013) Multiphase enhancement patterns of small renal masses (<4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. Urology 81:1265–1272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bird VG, Kanagarajah P, Morillo G et al (2011) Differentiation of oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses (<4 cm): the role of 4-phase computerized tomography. World J Urol 29:787–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woo S, Cho JY, Kim SY et al (2013) Segmental enhancement inversion of small renal oncocytoma: differences in prevalence according to tumor size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1054–1059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Malley MW, Tran P, Hanbidge A et al (2012) Small renal oncocytomas: is segmental enhancement inversion a characteristic finding at biphasic MDCT? AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1312–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim JH, Bae JH, Lee KW et al (2012) Predicting the histology of small renal masses using preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 80:872–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun MRM, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 250:793–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Egbert ND, Caoili EM, Cohan RH et al (2013) Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:347–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliva MR, Glickman JN, Zou KH et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1524–1530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dang TT, Ziv E, Weinstein S et al (2012) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of adult renal cell carcinoma associated Xp11.2 translocation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:669–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu QQ, Wang ZQ, Zhu WR et al (2013) The multislice CT findings of renal carcinoma associated with XP11.2 translocation/TFE gene fusion and collecting duct carcinoma. Acta Radiologica 54:355–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raza SA, Sohaib SA, Sahdev A et al (2012) Centrally infiltrating renal masses on CT: differentiating intrarenal transitional cell carcinoma from centrally located renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:846–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choi SJ, Jim HS, Ahn SJ et al (2012) Differentiating radiological features of rapid-and slow-growing renal cell carcinoma using multidetector computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:313–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Mullens JK et al (2012) Active surveillance of small renal masses. Rev Urol 14:13–19.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2217–2220.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Halverson SJ, Kunju LP, Bhalla R et al (2013) Accuracy of determining small renal mass management with risk stratified biopsies: confirmation by final pathology. J Urol 189:441–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah RB, Bakshi N, Hafez KS et al (2005) Image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal mass lesions in contemporary urological practice: indications, adequacy, clinical impact, and limitations of the pathological diagnosis. Hum Pathol 36:1309–1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hes O, Michal M, Kuroda N et al (2007) Vimentin reactivity in renal oncocytoma: immunohistochemical study in 234 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:1782–1788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hedgire SS, Elmi A, Nadkarni ND et al (2013) Preoperative evaluation of perinephric fat invasion in patients with renal cell carcinoma: correlation with pathological findings. Clin Imag 37:91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM et al (2008) Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1220–1232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davenport M, Caoili EM, Cohan RH et al (2009) MR and CT characteristics of successfully ablated renal masses status-post radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1571–1578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsivian M, Kim CY, Caso JR et al (2012) Contrast enhancement on computed tomography after renal cryoablation: an evidence of treatment failure? J Endourol 26:330–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kawamoto S, Solomon SB, Bluemke DA et al (2009) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of renal neoplasms after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 30:67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lall CG, Patel HP, Fujimoto S et al (2012) Making sense of postoperative CT imaging following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Clin Radiol 67:675–686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Corwin MT, Lamba R, Wilson M et al (2013) Renal cell carcinoma metastases to the pancreas: value of arterial imaging. Acta Radiologica 54:349–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lejla Aganovic
    • 1
  • Richard H. Cohan
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.University of California at San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations