How to Interpret the Curves on the Ventilator Screen

  • Stefano NavaEmail author
  • Francesco Fanfulla


Our personal opinion, reached without the support of data meeting the criteria for evidence-based medicine, is that monitoring the flow, pressure, and volume curves, at least in the first few hours of ventilation, is one of the keys to the success of NIV. The analysis of these signals in real time is particularly useful for evaluating the interaction between the patient and the machine.

Suggested Reading

  1. Calderini E, Confalonieri M, Puccio PG et al (1999) Patient–ventilator asynchrony during noninvasive ventilation: the role of expiratory trigger. Intensive Care Med 25(7):662–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlucci A, Pisani L, Ceriana P, Malovini A, Nava S (2013) Patient–ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role? Crit Care 17:R54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao DC, Scheinhorn DJ, Stearn-Hassenpflug M (1997) Patient–ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest 112(6):1592–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Marco F, Centanni S, Bellone A, Messinesi G, Pesci A, Scala R, Perren A, Nava S (2011) Optimization of ventilator setting by flow and pressure waveforms analysis during noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of COPD: a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 15:R283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hotchkiss JR, Adams AB, Dries DJ et al (2001) Dynamic behavior during noninvasive ventilation: chaotic support? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163(2):374–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mulqueeny Q, Ceriana P, Carlucci A et al (2007) Automatic detection of ineffective triggering and double triggering during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 33(11):2014–2018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nava S, Ceriana P (2005) Patient–ventilator interaction during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Respir Care Clin N Am 11(2):281–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nava S, Bruschi C, Rubini F et al (1995) Respiratory response and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 21(11):871–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nava S, Bruschi C, Fracchia C et al (1997) Patient–ventilator interaction and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in patients with different pathologies. Eur Respir J 10(1):177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ranieri VM, Giuliani R, Mascia L (1996) Patient–ventilator interaction during acute hypercapnia: pressure-support vs. proportional-assist ventilation. J Appl Physiol 81(1):426–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sassoon CS, Foster GT (2001) Patient–ventilator asynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 7(1):28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B (2006) Patient–ventilator asyncrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 32(10):1515–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vitacca M, Nava S, Confalonieri M et al (2000) The appropriate setting of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in stable COPD patients. Chest 118(5):1286–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Younes M, Brochard L, Grasso S et al (2007) A method for monitoring and improving patient: ventilator interaction. Intensive Care Med 33(8):1337–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Respiratory and Critical Care UnitAO Sant’ Orsola Malpighi HospitalBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Sleep Medicine UnitFondazione Salvatore Maugeri Division PneumologicaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations