Skip to main content

Introduzione

  • Chapter
Book cover Protocollo MEC

Riassunto

La comprensione del ruolo degli emisferi cerebrali nella comunicazione verbale è cambiata negli ultimi decenni. Se in generale si ritiene che l’emisfero sinistro sostenga gli aspetti formali del linguaggio (ad esempio, la fonologia), l’integrità dell’emisfero destro è considerata necessaria per una comunicazione verbale ricca ed efficiente. In particolare, una lesione all’emisfero destro può danneggiare alcune componenti verbali di livello superiore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  • Angeleri R, Bosco FM, Gabbatore I et al (2012) Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data. Behav Res 44:845–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beausoleil N, Fortin R, Le Blanc B, Joanette Y (2003) Unconstrained oral naming performance in right-and left-hemisphere-damaged individuals: when education overrides the lesion. Aphasiology 17:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benowitz LI, Moya KL, Levine DM (1990) Impaired verbal reasoning and constructional apraxia in subjects with right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 28:231–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton E, Bryan K (1996) Right cerebral hemisphere damage: incidence of language problems. Int J Rehab Res 19(1):47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berti A, Ladavas E, Della Corte M (1996) Anosognosia for hemiplegia, neglect dyslexia and drawing neglect: clinical findings and theoretical consideration. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2:426–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broca P (1865) Sur la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de la Société d’Anthropologie 6:337–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan KL (1989) The right hemisphere language battery. Far Communications, Kibworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne-Lavau M, Joanette Y (2009) Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: different patterns of deficits. J Neurolinguist 22:413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chantraine Y, Joanette Y, Ska B (1998) Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. J Neurolinguist 2(1–2):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello C, Church KL (1986) Lexical judgment after right-or left-hemisphere injury. Neuropsychologia 24:623–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Code C, Wallesch CW, Joanette Y, Lecours AR (2002) Classic cases in neuropsychology, vol. 2. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté H, Payer M, Giroux F, Joanette Y (2007) Towards a description of clinical communication impairment profiles following right-hemisphere damage. Aphasiology 21:739–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley M (1962) Speech and speech-loss in relation to duality of the brain. In: Mountcastle VB (ed) Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp 208–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis GA, O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Coon M (1997) Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke. Brain Lang 56(2):183–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dax M (1836; 1865) Lésions de la moitié gauche de l’encéphale coïncidant avec l’oubli des signes de la pensée (Lu au Congrès méridional tenu à Montpellier en 1836). Gazette Hebdomadaire de Médecine et de Chirurgie 2:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggs CC, Basili AG (1987) Verbal expression of right cerebro-vascular accident patients: convergent and divergent language. Brain Lang 30:130–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eck K, Côté H, Ska B, Joanette Y (2001) Analyse critique des protocoles d’évaluation des troubles de la communication des cérébrolésés droits. Communication affichée, 7° Congresso della Società Latino-Americana di Neuropsicologia (SLAN), Sao Paulo, Brasil

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenson J (1959) Language dysfunctions associated with right brain damage. American Speech and Hearing Association 1:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenson J (1962) Language and intellectual modifications associated with right cerebral damage. Lang Speech 5:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon L, Goulet P, Giroux F, Joanette Y (2003) Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words after right-and left-hemispheric lesion. Brain Lang 87:217–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Vásquez P, Pell MD, Paulmann S et al (2012) An ERP study of vocal emotion processing in asymmetric Parkinson’s disease. Soc Cogn Affect Neur. doi:10.1093/scan/nss094

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RW, Jr (1999) Interpreting what speakers say and implicate. Brain Lang 68:466–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halper AS, Cerney LR, Burns MS, Mogil SI (1996) Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Evaluation of Communication Problems in Right Hemisphere Dysfunction-Revised. Aspen, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D, Willmes K (1996) Aachener Aphasie Test (adattamento italiano a cura di Luzzatti C, Willmes K, De Bleser R). Giunti — Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JH (1879) On affections of speech from disease of the brain. Brain 2:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanette Y, Ansaldo AI (2001) Aphasie et troubles de la communication verbale de nature non aphasique chez les cérébrolésés droits: le paradoxe. Aphasies et Domains Associés 15:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanette Y, Goulet P (1986) Criterion-specific reduction of verbal fluency in right-brain-damaged righthanders. Neuropsychologia 24:875–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joanette Y, Goulet P (1990) Narrative discourse in right-brain damaged right-handers. In: Joanette Y, Brownell HH (eds) Discourse ability and brain damage: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joanette Y, Goulet P, Hannequin D (1990) Right hemisphere and verbal communication. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc B, Joanette Y (1996) Unconstrained oral naming in left-and right-hemisphere-damaged patients: an analysis of naturalistic semantic strategies. Brain Lang 55:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lojek-Osiejuk E (1996) Knowledge of scripts reflected in discourse of aphasics and right-brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 53:58–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers PS (1999) Right hemisphere damage: disorders of communication and cognition. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers PS, Brookshire RH (1995) Effect of noun type on naming performance of right-hemispheredamaged and non-brain-damaged adults. Clin Aphasiol 23:195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers PS, Linebaugh CW (1981) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions by right-hemisphere-damaged adults. In: Brookshire RH (ed) Clinical aphasiology: conference proceedings. BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, pp 254–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Pell MD (1999) Fundamental frequency encoding of linguistic and emotional prosody by right-hemisphere-damaged speakers. Brain Lang 69:161–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pell MD (2007) Reduced sensitivity to prosodic attitudes in adults with focal right hemisphere brain damage. Brain Lang 101:64–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters AS, Rémi J, Vollmar C et al (2011) Dysprosody during epileptic seizures lateralizes to the nondominant hemisphere. Neurology 77:1482–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimental PA, Kingsbury NA (1989) Mini inventory of brain injury. Pro-Ed, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehak A, Kaplan JA, Weylman ST et al (1992) Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 42:320–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi MC, Marangolo P, Lauriola M (2006) BLED SantaLucia. Batteria sul linguaggio dell’Emi — sfero Destro SantaLucia. Giunti — Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross DG (1996) Ross information processing assessment, 2nd edn. Pro-Ed, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabourin L, Goulet P, Joanette Y (1988) Word-naming in right-brain-damaged right-handers: effect of level of productivity of criteria. Poster presentato al 26° meeting annuale dell’Academy of Aphasia, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemmer B, Giroux F, Joanette Y (1994) Production and evaluation of requests by right hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain Lang 47:1–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tavano A, Sponda S, Fabbro F et al (2008) Specific linguistic and pragmatic deficits in Italian patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 102:53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Titone D, Wingfield A, Waters G, Prentice K (2001) Memory and encoding of spoken discourse following right hemisphere damage: evidence from the Auditory Moving Window (AMW) technique. Brain Lang 77:10–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins CA (1995) Right hemisphere communication disorders: theory and management. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins CA, Mateer CA (1985) Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of implicit attitude. Brain Lang 24:185–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JP, Daigle T (2000) Hemispheric specialization in processing prosodic structures: revisited. Brain Lang 36:580–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein EA (1964) Affection of speech with lesions of the non-dominant hemisphere. Research publications of the Association for research in nervous and mental disease 42:220–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winner E, Gardner H (1977) The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain 100:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanini S, Bryan K (2003) BaLED — La Batteria del Linguaggio dell’Emisfero Destro. Edizioni EMS Sistemi Elettromedicali, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tavano, A., Côté, H., Ferré, P., Ska, B., Joanette, Y. (2013). Introduzione. In: Protocollo MEC. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5456-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5456-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5455-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5456-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics