Skip to main content

Riassunto

La chirurgia è, per varie ragioni, una delle attività cliniche a maggior rischio: l’incertezza derivante dalla variabilità biologica del paziente, la complessità delle situazioni che interagiscono tra loro, le priorità che rapidamente cambiano, la dipendenza dal team work, il differente livello di abilità tecnica del chirurgo. L’esito di un trattamento chirurgico viene spesso fatto dipendere dalla situazione clinica del paziente e dalla professionalità del chirurgo ma, in realtà, è fortemente influenzato dal buon funzionamento di tutto il processo clinico/ organizzativo che è molto complesso e fortemente dipendente da fattori ergonomici, importanti per il conseguimento di una performance sicura e di qualità. Tali fattori non riguardano il solo chirurgo ma tutti i professionisti sanitari coinvolti durante ogni singola fase del percorso clinico-assistenziale, prima, durante e dopo l’accesso in sala operatoria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Ministero del Lavoro della Salute (2010) Rapporto annuale sull’attività di ricovero ospedaliero. Dati SDO 2010. www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1690_allegato.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM et al (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prospero E, Cavicchi A, Bacelli S et al (2006) Surveillance for surgical site infection after hospital discharge. A surgical procedure-specific perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 12:1313–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Bellandi T et al (2012) Adverse events and preventable consequences: retrospective study in five large Italian hospitals. Epidemiol Prev 36(3–4):151–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of inhospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17(3):216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraus TW, Buchler MW, Herfarth C (2005) Relationships between volume, and quality in surgery — a delicate balance from managerial perspectives. World J Surg 29:1234–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Main DS, Cavender TA, Nowels CT et al (2007) Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a qualitative analysis. J Am Coll Surg 204(6):1147–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S et al (2005) Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. Epidemiol Prev 29(3–4 Suppl):3–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CM, Huang KY, Hsu TW et al (2012) Multivariate analyses to assess the effects of surgeon and hospital volume on cancer survival rates: a nation wide population-based study in Taiwan. PLoSOne 7(7):e40590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. Committee on quality. In: America. Institute of Medicine. National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon NL, Dawson AA, Bennet B et al (1993) Outcome in colorectal adenocarcinoma: two seven year studies of a population. BMJ 307:707–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM et al (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neale G, Woloshynowych M, Vincent CA (2001) Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice. J R Soc Med 94:322–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker SK et al (2004) System approaches to surgical quality and safety. From concept to measurement. Ann Surg 239(4):475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catchpole KR, Giddins AE, Wilkinson M et al (2007) Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery 142:102–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burnett S, Franklin BD, Moorthy K et al (2012) How reliable are clinical systems in the UK NHS? A study of seven NHS organizations. BMJ Qual Saf 21(6):466–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Symons NR, Almoudaris AM, Nagpal K et al (2012) An observational study of the frequency, severity, and etiology of failures in postoperative care after major elective general surgery. Ann Surg 257:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barach P (2005) Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care. Ann Intern Med 42(9):756–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N (2006) Non technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 139(2):140–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagpal K, Arora S, Vats A et al (2012) Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study. BMJ Qual Saf 21(10):843–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gawande AA, Weiser TG (2008) World Health Organization guidelines for safe surgery. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Gawande AA et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New Engl J Med 360(5):491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. deVries EN, Hollmann MW, Smorenburg SM et al (2009) Development and validation of the SURgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist. Qual Saf Health Care 18(2):121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Toccafondi G, Albolino S, Tartaglia R et al (2012) Analysis of the interface between high acuity and low acuity care: the collaborative communication model for patient handover. BMJ Qual Saf 21(Suppl 1):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Centro Gestione Rischio Clinico e Sicurezza del Paziente (2008) Aida o Lidia. Perché il paziente non è solo un nome. http://www.regione.toscana.it/rischioclinico/comunicazione/collane/ index. html, accesso 11 dicembre 2012

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barach P, Small SD (2000) Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ 320:759–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF (2010) The Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lagasse RS (2002) Anesthesia safety: model or myth? A review of the published literature and analysis of current original data. Anesthesiology 97:1609–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Catchpole K, Bell MD, Johnson S (2008) Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12,606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Anaesthesia 63:340–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Merry AF (2008) Safety in anaesthesia: reporting incidents and learning from them. Anaesthesia 63:337–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Staender SEA, Mahajan RP (2011) Anesthesia and patient safety: have we reached our limits? Curr Opin Anesthesiol 24:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Venneri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ninu, M.B., Tulli, G., Venneri, F. (2013). Chirurgia. In: Tartaglia, R., Vannucci, A. (eds) Prevenire gli eventi avversi nella pratica clinica. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5450-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5450-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5449-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5450-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics