Abstract
Neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy is defined as the first systemic treatment a patient receives when nonmetastatic breast cancer is diagnosed. Neoadjuvant treatment has the ability to shrink tumors and was first used, in the 1970s, in patients with inoperable locally-advanced or inflammatory disease. Data from several retrospective analyses showed that the application of multimodal treatment consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy improved survival for patients with locally-advanced breast cancer (LABC) [1–2]. The role of neoadjuvant treatment has evolved since this time; indeed, in the last two decades, preoperative chemotherapy has also been performed in women with large operable breast cancer in order to downstage the tumor and thus enabling breast-conservative surgery. More recently, the preoperative approach has also been tested in patients with early breast cancer, suitable for conservative surgery, in order to allow a more rapid evaluation of new therapies without the need for long-term follow-up to demonstrate a survival advantage [3–27]. The absence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of residual tumor (pCR; pathologic complete response) is associated with a very favorable long-term outcome, suggesting that pCR could be a marker for long-term effects on disseminated tumor cells [28]. However, different definitions of pCR have been reported in the past (i.e. no residual tumor in breast, no residual tumor in breast and axilla, only residual DCIS), since there was not a general agreement about the prognostic impact of residual carcinoma in situ in the breast, and of the persistence of residual tumor only in the axillary nodes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
De Lena M, Varini M, Zucali R et al (1981) Multimodal treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: result of chemotherapy-radiotherapy versus chemotherapy-surgery. Cancer Clinical Trials 4:229–236
Chevallier B, Roche H, Olivier JP et al (1993) Inflammatory breast cancer: pilot study of intensive induction chemotherapy (FEC-HD) results in a high histologic response rate. Am J Clin Oncol 16:223–228
Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C et al (1998) Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight year experience of the Milan Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 16:93–100
Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102
van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. J Clin Oncol 19:4224–4237
Gianni L, Baselga J, Eiermann W et al (2009) Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2474–2481
Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:188–194
Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW et al (2002) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 20:1456–1466
Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE et al (2006) Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 24:2019–2027
Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26:778–785
Mazouni C, Kau SW, Frye D et al (2007) Inclusion of taxanes, particularly weekly paclitaxel, in preoperative chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response rate in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Ann Oncol 18:874–880
Green MC, Buzdar AU, Smith T et al (2005) Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks. J Clin Oncol 23:5983–5992
Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S et al (2008) Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. New Engl J Med 358:1663–1671
Bonilla L, Ben-Aharon I, Vidal L et al (2010) Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1845–1854
Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D et al (2005) Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3676–3685
Untch M, Rezai M, Loibl S et al (2010) Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. J Clin Oncol 28:2024–2031
Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomized controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384
Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al (2012) Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial. Lancet 379:633–640
Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J et al (2012) Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:135–144
Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:25–32
von Minckwitz G, Eidtmann H, Rezai M (2012) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366:299–309
Bear HD, Tang G, Rastogi P et al(2012) Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 366:310–320
Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR et al (2005) Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. Clin Cancer Res 11:951–958
Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B et al (2001) Letrozole is more effective neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1-and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 19:3808–3816
Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J et al (2008) Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1380–1388
Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype—ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29:2342–2349
Masuda N, Sagara Y, Kinoshita T et al (2012) Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:345–352
Schott AF, Hayes DF (2012) Defining the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:1747–1749
Fumagalli D, Bedard PL, Nahleh Z et al (2012) A common language in neoadjuvant breast cancer clinical trials: proposals for standard definitions and endpoints. Lancet Oncol 13:240–248
Colleoni M, Viale G, Zahrieh D et al (2004) Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors: a study of preoperative treatment. Clin Cancer Res 10:6622–6628
Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A et al (2012) Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL-CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J Clin Oncol 30:3242–3249
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804
Jeruss JS, Mittendorf EA, Tucker SL et al (2008) Combined use of clinical and pathologic staging variables to define outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 26:246–252
Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL et al (2011) Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 29:1956–1962
Chen AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK et al (2004) Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol 22:2303–2312
Xing YMF, Cox DD, Kuerer HM et al (2006) Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 93:539–546
Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S et al (2005) Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 23:2694–2702
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
D’Aiuto, M., Frasci, G. (2014). Preoperative Systemic Therapy. In: Mariotti, C. (eds) Oncologic Breast Surgery. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5438-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5438-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5437-0
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5438-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)