Skip to main content

Developing a New ECMO Program

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ECMO-Extracorporeal Life Support in Adults

Abstract

In recent decades, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has become a fundamental support for cases of severe cardiopulmonary failure not responsive to conventional therapy. But the technical skills and clinical competencies required for proper management of such an invasive and high-risk treatment have limited its application.

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) has published a list of recommendations and requirements that a center should satisfy in order to be recognized as suitable for managing extracorporeal support.

For an ECMO program to be developed, a dedicated team, led by a coordinator, must be available daily for 24-h coverage.

The training of personnel is essential to allow the program to run. That’s why ELSO created the so-called ECMO specialist: physician, nurse, or perfusionist familiar to this technology and the care of patients treated with ECMO.

With the encouraging results obtained over the last 10 years, and the increasingly simplified use of latest-generation miniaturized devices, extracirculatory support is bound to become more widespread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Peek G et al (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(17):1351–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis et al (2009) Australia and New Zeland Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) influenza investigators. JAMA 302(17):1888–1895

    Google Scholar 

  3. ELSO Guidelines for ECMO Centers, version 1.7 Feb 2010, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. ELSO guidelines for the training and continuous education of ECMO specialists. Version 1.5 (2012) Available at: http://www.elsonet.org/index.php/resources/guidelines.html

  5. MaClaren G et al (2007) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and sepsis. Crit Care Resusc 9:76–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skinner SC et al (2012) Improved survival in venovenous vs venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric non cardiac septic patients. A study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. J Pediatr Surg 47:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung K et al (2006) Improved survival after cardiac arrest using emergent autopriming percutaneous cardiopulmonary support. Ann Thorac Surg 82:651–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Halm EA et al (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137(6):511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn JM (2007) Volume, outcome and the organization of intensive care. Crit Care 11(3):129

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogino MT et al (2012) ECMO Administrative and Training Issues, and Sustaining Quality. In Annich G (ed) ECMO: extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in critical care, 4th edn. ELSO, Ann Arbor. pp. 479–497

    Google Scholar 

  11. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (2010) Extracorporeal: ECMO specialist training manual. ELSO, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheean PM et al (2013) The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with respiratory failure classified as normally nourished using computed tomography and subjective global assessment. JPEN J Parent Enterl Nutr 20(10):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts TE (1998) Economic evaluation and randomised controlled trial of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: UK collaborative trial. The Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Economics Working Group. BMJ 317:911–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrou S et al (2004) Cost effectiveness of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on four years results from the UK Collaborative ECMO trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F263–F268

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peek GJ et al (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:1352–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio F. Arcadipane MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arcadipane, A.F., Panarello, G. (2014). Developing a New ECMO Program. In: Sangalli, F., Patroniti, N., Pesenti, A. (eds) ECMO-Extracorporeal Life Support in Adults. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5427-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5427-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5426-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5427-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics