Skip to main content

PET/CT with [18F]FDG in Endometrial Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging in Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the use of glucose analogue 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose, [18F]FDG, has a major impact in oncology. Nowadays, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in gynaecological malignancies. Concerning the cervical cancer, imaging with [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not routinely used for the initial diagnosis but the preoperative [18F]FDG uptake in the primary tumour seems to offer significant prognostic information. Also, [18F]FDG-PET/CT is an important tool for initial staging particularly in identifying involved lymph nodes and distant metastasis, while it may impact external-beam radiotherapy planning. Finally, it is reported as an important diagnostic tool for detecting recurrent cervical cancer in clinically equivocal patients and for monitoring post-treatment metabolic response. Concerning the ovarian cancer, [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not used for initial diagnosis because of false positive results but it may contribute to the detection of metastases outside the pelvis in the initial staging. There are published data for the value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy planning and accurate restaging after treatment, but this method seems to have the greatest utility in ovarian cancer recurrence detection, mainly in patients with an increase of the tumour marker CA-125 and negative or inconclusive findings at CT or MRI. Finally, for the endometrial cancer there are few studies that support that [18F]FDG-PET/CT may play role as a prognostic factor and offer a high accuracy in the evaluation of recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakamura K, Joja I, Fukushima C, Haruma T, Hayashi C, Kusumoto T, Seki N, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2013) The preoperative SUVmax is superior to ADCmin of the primary tumour as a predictor of disease recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:52–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitajima K, Kita M, Suzuki K, Senda M, Nakamoto Y, Sugimura K (2012) Prognostic significance of SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value) measured by [18F]FDG PET/CT in endometrial cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura K, Hongo A, Kodama J, Hiramatsu Y (2011) The measurement of SUVmax of the primary tumor is predictive of prognosis for patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 123:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2008) Accuracy of FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1652–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2009) Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer. Eur Radiol 19:1529–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS et al (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Murakami K, Sugimura K (2012) Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 4:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, Perego P, Moreni R, Pellegrino A, Colombo M, Mangioni C, Messa C, Fazio F (2006) Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 238:272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH (2008) Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 108:486–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung HH, Park NH, Kim JW, Song YS, Chung JK, Kang SB (2009) Role of integrated PET-CT in pelvic lymph node staging of cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Signorelli M, Guerra L, Buda A, Picchio M, Mangili G, Dell’Anna T, Sironi S, Messa C (2009) Role of the integrated FDG PET/CT in the surgical management of patients with high risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: detection of pelvic nodal metastases. Gynecol Oncol 115:231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Picchio M, Mangili G, Samanes Gajate AM et al (2010) High-grade endometrial cancer: value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in preoperative staging. Nucl Med Commun 31:506–512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nayot D, Kwon JS, Carey MS et al (2008) Does preoperative positron emission tomography with computed tomography predict nodal status in endometrial cancer? A pilot study. Curr Oncol 15:123–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2008) Performance of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrent endometrial cancer. Ann Nucl Med 22:103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Antonsen SL, Jensen LN, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Costa J, Tabor A, et al (2013) MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer—a multicenter prospective comparative study. Gynecol Oncol 128:300–308

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2010) Spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings of uterine tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sironi S, Picchio M, Landoni C, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, Bettinardi V et al (2007) Post-therapy surveillance of patients with uterine cancers: value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung HH, Kang WJ, Kim JW et al (2008) The clinical impact of [18F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY et al (2008) Clinical impact of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the posttherapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma: evaluation of 88 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:1332–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kadkhodayan S, Shahriari S, Treglia G, Yousefi Z, Sadeghi R (2013) Accuracy of 18-F-FDG PET imaging in the follow up of endometrial cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 128:397–404

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis E. Datseris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skoura, E.V., Datseris, I.E. (2014). PET/CT with [18F]FDG in Endometrial Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5385-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5385-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5384-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5385-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics