Skip to main content

Contribution of Endo-ultrasonography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endoscopic Follow-up of Digestive Anastomosis

Abstract

Local recurrences after surgical treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, especially rectal cancers, still represent a significant problem. True anastomotic recurrences are uncommon; most are extra-luminal and cannot be diagnosed by endoscopy. Endo-ultrasonography (EUS) provides high-resolution images of the GI wall and the adjacent organs, so it has been proposed for the postoperative follow-up of surgical anastomoses. EUS has proved to be highly sensitive in detecting local recurrences. Sometimes it can be difficult to distinguish an early recurrence from an anastomotic scar on the basis of EUS imaging alone. A tissue-specific diagnosis can then be achieved by performing an EUS-guided FNAB. However, for the anastomoses of the upper gastrointestinal tract, a follow-up program based on EUS has a very limited clinical impact because local tumor recurrences following surgical resection for esophageal cancer can rarely be treated by a reoperation. On the contrary, some patients with local recurrences after surgical resection of rectal cancers can undergo salvage surgery with a curative intent. Therefore, a periodic anastomotic evaluation by both proctoscopy and EUS could be justified, but no consensus exists on the modality and the duration of follow-up. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness and real survival advantage of the surveillance are still being debated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lightdale CJ, Botet JF, Keksen DP, Turnbull AD, Brennan MF (1989) Diagnosis of recurrent upper gastrointestinal cancer at the surgical anastomosis by endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 35:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Scherr O (1986) Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects. Int Colorect Dis 1:203–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beynon J, Mortensen NJ, Foy DMA, Channer JL, Rigby H, Virjee J (1989) Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 76:276–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakajima S (2001) The efficacy of the EUS for the detection of recurrent disease in the anastomosis of colon. Diagn Ther Endosc 7:149–158

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindmark G, Elvin A, Pahlman L, Glimelius B (1992) The value of endosonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hizawa A, Aoyagi K, Suekane H, Mibu R, Yao T, Fujishima M (1996) Suture granuloma in rectal anastomosis mistaken for local recurrent cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 23:78–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller C, Kähler G, Scheele J (2000) Endosonographic examination of gastrointestinal anastomoses with suspected locoregional tumor recurrence. Surg Endosc 14:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rösch T, Classen M (1992) Colorectal carcinoma. In: Elder D (ed) Gastroenterologic endosonography. Thieme Medical, New York, pp 170–185

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernandez de Anda E, Lee S, Finne CO, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, Garcia-Aguilar J (2004) Endorectal ultrasound in the follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated by local excision or radical surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 47:818–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffman JP, Riley L, Carp NZ, Litwin S (1993) Isolated locally recurrent rectal cancer: a review of incidence, presentation, and management. Semin Oncol 20:506–519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeWitt J, Ghorai S, Kahi C, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Chappo J, Cramer H, McGreevy K, Chriswell M, Sherman S (2003) EUS-FNA of recurrent postoperative extraluminal and metastatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:542–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fockens P, Manshanden CG, van Lanschot JJ, Obertop H, Tytgat GNJ (1997) Prospective study on the value of endosonographic follow-up after surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 46:487–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81:7–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiurke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emslie J, Beart R, Mohiuddin M, Marks G (1998) Use of rectal cancer position as a prognostic indicator. Am Surg 64:958–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, Garcia-Aguilar J (2000) Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 43:1064–1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano G, Esercizio L, Santangelo M, Vallone G, Santangelo ML (1993) Impact of computer tomography vs. intrarectal ultrasound on the diagnosis, resectability, and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 36:261–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hünerbein M, Totkas S, Moesta KT, Ulmer C, Handke T, Schlag PM (2001) The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the postoperative follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Surgery 129:164–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Löhnert MS, Doniec JM, Henne-Bruns D (2000) Effectiveness of endoluminal sonography in the identification of occult rectal cancer recurrences. Dis Colon Rectum 43:483–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema IM (1997) Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 112:1087–1095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N et al (2004) Parameters for the surveillance and follow up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:807–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Napolitano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Napolitano, V., Bondanese, M.C., Avellino, M. (2014). Contribution of Endo-ultrasonography. In: Galloro, G. (eds) Endoscopic Follow-up of Digestive Anastomosis. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5370-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5370-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5369-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5370-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics