Abstract
Endoscopic follow-up is defined as the performance of endoscopic examination(s) subsequent to an index endoscopy aimed at both:
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696
Spechler SJ (2011) Screening and surveillance for complications related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 111(Suppl 8A):130S–136S
Wani S, Puli SR, Shaheen NJ et al (2009) Esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus after endoscopic ablative therapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 104:502–513
Wani S, Falk G, Hall M et al (2011) Patients with nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus have low risks for developing dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:220–227
American Gastroenterological Association, Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ (2011) AGA medical position statement on the management of Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 140:1084–1091
Pech O, Ell C (2009) Endoscopic therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 25:405–411
Das A, Wells C, Kim HJ et al (2009) An economic analysis of endoscopic ablative therapy for management of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 41:400–408
Fleischer DE, Odze R, Overholt BF et al (2010) The case for endoscopic treatment of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 55:1918–1931
Inadomi JM, Somsouk M, Madanick RD et al (2009) A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 136:2101–2114
Bulsiewicz WJ, Shaheen NJ (2011) The role of radiofrequency ablation in the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 21:95–109
Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE et al (2011) Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology 141:460–468
Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y et al (2003) Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 35:506–510
Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C et al (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127:452–456
Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al (2005) Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61:385–391
Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al (2010) Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:2588–2596
Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS et al (2012) Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 118:3044–3052
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al (2012) Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case–control study. Gut 61:1576–1582
Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP et al (2012) Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 44:470–475
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350
Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al (2008) Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40:284–290
Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Korfage IJ et al (2012) Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the global rating scale. Endoscopy 44:462–472
Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Sansone S et al (2012) Trimodal endoscopic imaging for the detection and differentiation of colorectal adenomas: a prospective single-centre clinical evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:331–336
Fujiya M, Kohgo Y (2013) Image-enhanced endoscopy for the diagnosis of colon neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 77:111–118
Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C et al (2004) A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53:277–283
Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG et al (2012) Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Gut 61:1050–1057
Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al, United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (2012) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 143:844–857
Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA et al (2012) The incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer: an indication for follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 55:522–531
Sinclair P, Singh A, Riaz AA et al (2012) An unsolved conundrum: the ideal follow-up strategy after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1072–1079
Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN et al (2004) Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141:264–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rotondano, G., Sansone, S., Cesaro, C. (2014). Methodology and Appropriateness of Follow-Up in Digestive Endoscopy. In: Galloro, G. (eds) Endoscopic Follow-up of Digestive Anastomosis. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5370-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5370-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5369-4
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5370-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)