Skip to main content

The Long-Term Percentage of Dissatisfied

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thermal Comfort Assessment of Buildings

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 2236 Accesses

Abstract

Following the analysis about the indices for the long-term comfort evaluation, carried out in the previous two chapters, in this chapter a new long-term discomfort index, called Long-term Percentage of Dissatisfied, is proposed, and its features are discussed. It is a symmetric and comfort-model based index, not depending on comfort categories, and it is applicable to both summer and winter assessments. This index is proposed in three versions, which differ in the way the hourly likelihood of thermal discomfort is evaluated, depending on the reference comfort model used for the assessment. The three versions weigh the zone hourly likelihood of thermal discomfort by the hourly occupancy rate in each thermal zone of the building. The first version of the new index is based on the Fanger comfort model, and its likelihood of thermal discomfort coincides with the Predicted percentage of dissatisfied. The second version is based on the EN adaptive comfort model, and its likelihood of thermal discomfort is calculated through the Nicol et al.’s overheating risk. The third is based on the ASHRAE adaptive comfort model, and, since a reliable likelihood of thermal discomfort was not identified in literature for this comfort model, it has been developed via a logistic regression analysis of the data collected in the ASHRAE RP-884 database. Therefore, the methodology adopted for deriving such new likelihood of thermal discomfort from the ASHRAE RP-884 data, and the result of the performed logistic regression analysis are presented. Then, the three versions of the index are calculated for the 54 building variants described in Chap. 1 and their results are compared. Finally, since the building performance simulation software used in this work, EnergyPlus, does not directly calculate the proposed new index, three computer codes have been written in the programming language EnergyPlus Runtime Language, and then integrated in EnergyPlus through the Energy Management System module.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO: ISO 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment. Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, 3rd version. International Standard Organization, Geneva (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. CEN: EN 15251: Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASHRAE: ANSI/ASHRAE 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.F. Kalz, J. Pfafferott, Comparative evaluation of natural ventilated and mechanical cooled non-residential buildings in germany: thermal comfort in summer, in Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort Cumberland Lodge, Windsor (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.O. Fanger, Thermal comfort (Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.J. de Dear, G.S. Brager, D. Cooper, Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. Final report, ASHRAE RP-884 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.F. Nicol, J. Hacker, B. Spires, H. Davies, Suggestion for new approach to overheating diagnostic. in Proceedings of Conference: Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.F. Nicol, K. McCartney, Final report of Smart Controls and Thermal Comfort (SCATs) Project. Report to the European Commission of the Smart Controls and Thermal Comfort project, Oxford Brookes University, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Griffiths, Thermal comfort studies in buildings with passive solar features: field studies. Report to Commission of the European Community, ENS35 909, UK (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Borgeson, G.S. Brager, Comfort exceedance metrics in mixed-mode buildings. in Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort Cumberland Lodge, Windsor (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.G. Ellis, P.A. Torcellini, D.B Crawley, Simulation of energy management systems In Energyplus. in Proceedings of Building simulation Conference, Beijing, 1-9 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. US DOE: Application Guide for EMS: Energy Management System Used guide. U.S. Department of Energy (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Carlucci .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlucci, S. (2013). The Long-Term Percentage of Dissatisfied. In: Thermal Comfort Assessment of Buildings. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5238-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5238-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5237-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5238-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics