Skip to main content

PR-Box Correlations Have No Classical Limit

  • Conference paper
Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story

Abstract

One of Yakir Aharonov’s endlessly captivating physics ideas is the conjecture that two axioms, namely relativistic causality (“no superluminal signalling”) and nonlocality, so nearly contradict each other that a unique theory—quantum mechanics—reconciles them. But superquantum (or “PR-box”) correlations imply that quantum mechanics is not the most nonlocal theory (in the sense of nonlocal correlations) consistent with relativistic causality. Let us consider supplementing these two axioms with a minimal third axiom: there exists a classical limit in which macroscopic observables commute. That is, just as quantum mechanics has a classical limit, so must any generalization of quantum mechanics. In this classical limit, PR-box correlations violate relativistic causality. Generalized to all stronger-than-quantum bipartite correlations, this result is a derivation of Tsirelson’s bound without assuming quantum mechanics. [Editors note: for a video of the talk given by Dr. Rohrlich at the Aharonov-80 conference in 2012 at Chapman University, see quantum.chapman.edu/talk-10.]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Y. Aharonov, D. Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Poincaré, Sechs Vorträge aus der Reinen Mathematik und Mathematischen Physik (Teubner, Leipzig, 1910). (Transl. and cited in A. Pais, ‘Subtle is the Lord...’: the Science and Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford University Press, New York, 1982), pp. 167–168.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Aharonov, H. Pendleton, A. Petersen, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2, 213 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Aharonov, in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Tokyo (1983), p. 10. See also Aharonov, Y. and Rohrlich, D., op. cit., Chaps. 5, 6 and 13

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Shimony, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Light of the New Technology, ed. by S. Kamefuchi et al. (Japan Physical Society, Tokyo, 1983), p. 225

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Shimony, in Quantum Concepts of Space and Time, ed. by R. Penrose, C. Isham (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 182

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.S. Tsirelson (Cirel’son), Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994). (See also D. Rohrlich, The Frontiers Collection, in Probability in Physics, ed. by Y. Ben-Menahem, M. Hemmo (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 187–200.)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. van Dam, Nonlocality & communication complexity. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. van Dam, Preprint (2005). quant-ph/0501159

  14. D. Dieks, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062104 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Buhrman, S. Massar, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052103 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Barrett, S. Pironio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140401 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Brassard, H. Buhrman, N. Linden, A.A. Méthot, A. Tapp, F. Unger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Barrett, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032304 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Gross, M. Müller, R. Colbeck, O.C.O. Dahlsten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 080402 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Pawłowski et al., Nature 461, 1101 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Bohr, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist, ed. by P.A. Schilpp (Tudor Publ. Co., New York, 1951), pp. 201–241

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988). (See also, Y. Aharonov, D. Rohrlich, op. cit., Chaps. 16–17)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Rohrlich, Stronger-than-quantum bipartite correlations violate relativistic causality in the classical limit. Phys. Rev. Lett., submitted

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For over two decades I have had the great good fortune to work with Professor Yakir Aharonov, learning from his penetrating questions, his mastery of quantum and statistical fluctuations, his subtle formulations such as weak measurement and weak values, and his countless other insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rohrlich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rohrlich, D. (2014). PR-Box Correlations Have No Classical Limit. In: Struppa, D., Tollaksen, J. (eds) Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5217-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics