Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

  • Chapter
Ulcerative Colitis

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cranley B (1983) The Kock reservoir ileostomy: a review of its development, problems and role in modern surgical practice. Br J Surg 70(2):94–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, Church JM (1988) Complications and function of the continent ileostomy at the Cleveland Clinic. World J Surg 12(2):148–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schrock TR (1979) Complications of continent ileostomy. Am J Surg 138(1):162–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Börjesson L, Lundstam U, Øresland T et al (2006) The place for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis: a valid surgical option for ulcerative colitis? Tech Coloproctol 10(3):237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Luz Moreira A, Kiran RP, Lavery I (2010) Clinical outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 97(1):65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leijonmarck CE, Löfberg R, Ost A, Hellers G (1990) Long-term results of ileorectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis in Stockholm County. Dis Colon Rectum 33(3):195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker WN, Glass RE, Ritchie JK, Aylett SO (1978) Cancer of the rectum following colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 65(12):862–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhm G, O’Dwyer ST (2007) The fate of the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(3):277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ (1978) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 2(6130):85–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME (1985) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72(6):470–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M et al (1980) Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 23(7):459–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S et al (1989) Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorectal Dis 4(3):156–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fonkalsrud EW (1987) Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pull-through operation for colitis and polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165(4):309–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slors JF, Taat CW, Brummelkamp WH (1989) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without rectal muscular cuff. Int J Colorectal Dis 4(3):178–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson RL, Prasad LM, Pearl RK, Abcarian H (1991) Inverted U-pouch construction for restoration of function in patients with failed straight ileoanal pull-throughs. Dis Colon Rectum 34(11):1040–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston D, Holdsworth PJ, Nasmyth DG et al (1987) Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 74(10):940–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA , Heriot AG et al (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW (2009) Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery 146(4):723–729; discussion 729–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Melville DM, Ritchie JK, Nicholls RJ, Hawley PR (1994) Surgery for ulcerative colitis in the era of the pouch: the St Mark’s Hospital experience. Gut 35(8):1076–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zittan E, Wong-Chong N, Ma GW et al (2016) Modified two-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis results in lower rate of anastomotic leak compared with traditional two-stage surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 10(7):766–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Swenson BR, Hollenbeak CS, Poritz LS, Koltun WA (2005) Modified two-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: equivalent outcomes with less resource utilization. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartels SA, Gardenbroek TJ, Ubbink DT et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy with end ileostomy for non-toxic colitis. Br J Surg 100(6):726–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fajardo AD, Dharmarajan S, George V et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartels SA, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA et al (2012) Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 256(6):1045–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh P, Bhangu A, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis P (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 15(7):e340–e351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA et al (2017) Transanal versus transabdominal minimally invasive (completion) proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study. Ann Surg 266(5):878–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257(4):679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MacLean AR, O’Connor B, Parkes R et al (2002) Reconstructive surgery for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a viable surgical option with acceptable results. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):880–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Theodoropoulos GE, Choman EN, Wexner SD (2015) Salvage procedures after restorative proctocolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Remzi FH, Aytac E, Ashburn J et al (2015) Transabdominal redo ileal pouch surgery for failed restorative proctocolectomy: lessons learned over 500 patients. Ann Surg 262(4):675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

    Lorenzo Gentilini

Authors
  1. Gilberto Poggioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Gentilini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Coscia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luca Boschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Federica Ugolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Gentilini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Gilberto Poggioli

  2. General Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

    Gilberto Poggioli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poggioli, G., Gentilini, L., Coscia, M., Boschi, L., Ugolini, F. (2019). Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. In: Poggioli, G. (eds) Ulcerative Colitis. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-3976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-3977-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation