Skip to main content

Simulatori e apprendimento

  • Chapter
BetOnMath

Riassunto

In questo capitolo approfondiamo l’utilizzo dei simulatori di giochi d’azzardo sviluppati nell’ambito del progetto di ricerca BetOnMath, soffermandoci sull’impatto che essi hanno nel processo di apprendimento degli studenti, e della loro presa di coscienza sia delle probabilità (molto piccole) di vincere premi sostanziosi che dell’iniquità dei giochi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. C. Andrà, N. Parolini e M. Verani. “Using Gambling Simulators to Foster Awareness About Gambling Risks: A Focus on Emotions”. In: Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 1.1 (2015), pp. 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Artigue. “Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work”. In: International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 7.3 (2002), pp. 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bar-Hillel e W. A. Wagenaar. “The perception of randomness”. In: Advances in Applied Mathematics 12 (1991), pp. 428–454.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Batanero, J. D. Godino e R. Roa. “Training Teachers To Teach Probability”. In: Journal of Statistics Education 12.1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Batanero e L. Serrano. “The meaning of randomness for secondary school students”. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30.5 (1999), pp. 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. E. Bell. “Regret in decision making under uncertainty”. In: Operations research 30 (1982), pp. 361–381.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Burrill e R. Biehler. “Fundamental statistical ideas in the school curriculum and in training teachers”. In: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A joint ICMI/IASE Study. A cura di Carmen Batanero, Gail Burrill e Chris Reading. New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 57–69.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. Chernoff e B. Sriraman, cur. Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Engel e P. Sedlmeier. “On middle-school students’ comprehension of randomness and chance variability in data”. In: Zentralblatt fur Didaltik der Mathematik 37.3 (2005), pp. 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Falk. “The perception of randomness”. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. A cura di E. Laborde. Grenoble, France, 1981, pp. 222–229.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Falk, R. Falk e P. Ayton. “Subjective patterns of randomness and choice: some consequences of collective responses”. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35.1 (2009), pp. 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Falk e C. Konold. “Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment”. In: Psychological Review 104 (1997), pp. 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Garfield e D. Ben-Zvi. Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning. Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. R. Green. “Schools students’ understanding of randomness”. In: Studies in Mathematics Education. v.7: The Teaching of Statistics. A cura di R. Morris. Paris: UNESCO, 1989, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Mariotti. “Influence of technologies advances on students’ math learning”. In: Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. A cura di L. D. English. Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 2002, pp. 695–723.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. McNeill. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Rabardel. “Eléments pour une approche instrumentale en didactique des mathématique”. In: Actes de la 10ème Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques. A cura di M. Bailleul. Houlgate, France, 1999, pp. 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Rabardel. Les hommes & les technologies. Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Arman Colin Éditeur, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Rabardel e R. Samurçay. “From Artifact to Instrument-Mediated Learning”. In: New Challenges to Research on Learning. Helsinki, Finland, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Radford. “On the role of representations and artefacts in knowing and learning”. In: Educational Studies in Mathematics 85 (2014), pp. 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W.-M. Roth e L. Radford. A cultural historical perspective on teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrà, C., Parolini, N., Verani, M. (2016). Simulatori e apprendimento. In: BetOnMath. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3942-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics