Skip to main content

BetOnMath: genesi, contenuti e caratteristiche del percorso didattico

  • Chapter
BetOnMath

Riassunto

Questo capitolo è dedicato all’illustrazione del percorso didattico ideato nell’ambito del progetto di ricerca BetOnMath1. In particolare verranno discussi non solo i contenuti e le metodologie didattiche impiegate per implementare il percorso didattico, ma anche la sua genesi “partecipativa”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. C. Andrà, N. Parolini e M. Verani. “Using Gambling Simulators to Foster Awareness About Gambling Risks: A Focus on Emotions”. In: Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 1.1 (2015), pp. 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Andrà e G. Santi. “Intuitive thinking in a context of learning”. In: Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. A cura di A. Lindmeier e A. Heinze. Vol. 2. Kiel, Germany, 2013, pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bar-Hillel e W. A. Wagenaar. “The perception of randomness”. In: Advances in Applied Mathematics 12 (1991), pp. 428–454.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Bastiani et al. “Complex factors and behaviors in the gambling population of Italy”. In: Journal of Gambling Studies 29.1 (2011), pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Batanero e L. Serrano. “The meaning of randomness for secondary school students”. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30.5 (1999), pp. 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. E. Bell. “Regret in decision making under uncertainty”. In: Operations research 30 (1982), pp. 361–381.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Capitanucci. “Strategie di prevenzione del gioco d’azzardo patologico tra gli adolescenti in Italia. L’utilizzo di strumenti evidence-based per distinguere tra promozione e prevenzione”. In: The Italian Journal on Addiction 2.3–-4 (2012), pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Cefaloni, cur. Vite in gioco. Oltre la slot economia. Città Nuova, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Contucci. “Una questione di soldi”. In: Social News 4 (2014), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B D’Amore. Elementi di didattica della matematica. Pitagora Editrice, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Di Martino e R. Zan. “Attitude towards mathematics: a bridge between beliefs and emotions”. In: ZDM The international journal on Mathematics Education 43 (2011), pp. 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Engel e P. Sedlmeier. “On middle-school students’ comprehension of randomness and chance variability in data”. In: Zentralblatt fur Didaltik der Mathematik 37.3 (2005), pp. 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Falk. “The perception of randomness”. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. A cura di E. Laborde. Grenoble, France, 1981, pp. 222–229.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Falk, R. Falk e P. Ayton. “Subjective patterns of randomness and choice: some consequences of collective responses”. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35.1 (2009), pp. 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Falk e C. Konold. “Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment”. In: Psychological Review 104 (1997), pp. 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Fischbein. Intuitions in science and mathematics. Boston: Kluwer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Gal. “Adults’ statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities”. In: International statistical review 70.1 (2002), pp. 1–51.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Gigerenzer. “How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond “Heuristics and biases””. In: European review of social psychology 2 (1991), pp. 83–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. R. Green. “Schools students’ understanding of randomness”. In: Studies in Mathematics Education. v.7: The Teaching of Statistics. A cura di R. Morris. Paris: UNESCO, 1989, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Hannula. “The structure and dynamics of affect in mathematical thinking and learning”. In: Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European society for research in mathematics education. A cura di M. Pytlak, T. Rowland e E. E. Swoboda. Rzeszów, Poland: Erme, 2011, pp. 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Pepin e B. Roesken-Winter, cur. From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. Springer, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Poto, cur. Dossier Azzardopoli. Roma: Libera, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Radford. “Of love, frustration, and mathematics: A Cultural-historical approach to emotions in mathematics teaching and learning”. In: From beliefs and affect to dynamic systems: (exploring) a mosaic of relationships and interactions. A cura di B. Pepin e B. Rösken-Winter. Advances in Mathematics Education series. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Skott. “Towards a participatory approach to ‘beliefs’ in mathematics education”. In: From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. A cura di B. Pepin e B. Roesken-Winter. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2015, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrà, C., Parolini, N., Verani, M. (2016). BetOnMath: genesi, contenuti e caratteristiche del percorso didattico. In: BetOnMath. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3942-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics