Skip to main content

Techne. Interdisciplinary Examination for an Integrated Vision. Case Study: the Adriatic City

  • Chapter
Book cover Urban Landscapes
  • 1990 Accesses

Abstract

The different forms of environmental determinism (starting with the intuition of Ian McHarg) [1], which accompanied the interpretation of territorial dynamics in the last century, extinguished themselves without the need to refer to Kant’s thoughts regarding “students of nature.” Finally, we are convinced that nature does not design itself, let alone areas originating from a deep complex interaction between natural and anthropic dynamics, such as agrarian landscapes or settlements. On the contrary, it is necessary to develop design interpretations capable of structuring themselves amid the complexity of systematic visions.

When Galileo caused balls, the weights of which he had himself previously determined, to roll down an inclined plane, and Torricelli made air support a weight that he knew to be equal to the weight of a known volume of water … a light broke upon all students of nature. They learned that reason only has insight into that which it produces after a plan of its own, and that …it must force nature to give answers to questions of reason’s own determining; and must not allow itself to be kept, as it were, in nature’s leading strings; because otherwise our observations, made in obedience to no previously thought-out plan, can never be made to yield a necessary law… Kant (1787) Preface. In: Critica della ragion pura, Laterza, Rome-Bari

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McHarg J (1969 — 1st ed) Design with nature, Natural History Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosio M, Frate M (2010) Strategie per il progetto délia città sostenibile. Marsilio, Venezia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Owens S, Cowell R (2011) Land and limits: interpreting sustainability in the planning process. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xing Y, Dangerfield BC (2011) Modelling the Sustainability of Mass Tourism in Island Tourist Economies. In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(9): 1742–1752 http://www.seek.salford.ac.uk/user/profile/publications/view.do?publicationNum=26271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobranskyte Niskota A, Perujo A, Pregl M (2007) Indicators to Assess Sustainability of Transport Activities. JRC Scientific and Technical Report-European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2007-59

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thanh Van Mai and Kambiz E Maani (2010) Systems Thinking for Sustainable Tourism in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve of Vietnam. Proceeding of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Seoul, Korea, July 25–29, 2010 http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2010/proceed/papers/P1312.pdf

  7. Thanh Van Mai and Kambiz E Maani (2011) Toward a shared systems model of stakeholders in tourism development in the Cat Ba biosphere reserve of Vietnam. Proceeding of the 29th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Washington DC, My 25–29, 2011 http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2011/proceed/papers/P1201.pdf

  8. Mesev V (2003) Remote sensed cities. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Secchi B (1986) Progetto di suolo. In: Casabella, 520-521/1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Secchi B (2006) Progetto di suolo 2. In: Aymonino A, Mosco V P (eds) (2006) Spazi pubblici contemporanei. Architettura a volume zero. Skira, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gasparrini C (2012) Una nuova città: diffusione e densificazione. In: Sargolini M, Talia M (eds) Ri-conoscere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erbani F (2012) Alvaro Siza. In: La Repubblica, 24 August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pessoa F (1986) Il libro dell’inquietitudine di Bernardo Soares. Feltrinelli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Morales Yago FJ (2007) Agua y paysaje en Yecla. Ayuntamiento de Yecla, Yecla

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beigel F, Christou P (1997) Paisajes épicos. In Bru E, Adell G, Schneider J, et. al. Nuevos Territorios. Nuevos Paisajes. MACBA/Actar, Barcelona, pp 188–201

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sola Morales M (1979) La cultura della descrizione/The culture of description. In Lotus International 23. Electa, Milano, p 32

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Raffestin C (2005) Dalla nostalgia del territorio al desiderio di paesaggio. Alinea, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dematteis G (2000) Il senso comune del paesaggio come risorsa progettuale. In: H senso del paesaggio. IRES, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelnovi P (2004) H paesaggio limite del piano e del progetto. In: Quaderni della Rivista on doctoral research in landscape planning, Florence

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Smith L (2006) Uses of heritage. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Opdam P, Termorshuizen J (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashworth GJ (2008) In search of the place identity dividend. Using heritage landscapes to create place identity. In: Eyles J, Williams A (eds) Sense of Place, Health and quality of Life. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sargolini M (2012) Temi ricorrenti. In: Sargolini M, Talia M (eds) Ri-conoscere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azzena G (2011) History for places. In: Maciocco G, Sanna G, Serrelli S (eds) The Urban Potential of External Territories. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 196–227

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Acts of XII International Interdisciplinary Conference Volontà, libertà e nécessita nella creazione del mosaico paesistico-culturale, Cividale del Friuli, 27/10/2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2006) Green Infrastructure, Linking Landscapes and Communities. The Conservation Found. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santolini R (2008) Paesaggio e sostenibilità: i servizi ecosistemici come nuova chiave di lettura délia qualità del sistema d’area vasta. In: Riconquistare il Paesaggio, La Convenzione Europea del Paesaggio e la conservazione délia biodiversità in Italia. Miur, WWF Italia, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donadieu P (2006) Campagne urbane. Una nuova proposta di paesaggio délia città. Donzelli, Rome

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Clementi A (2008) Corridoi, piattaforme, città senza fine. Nuovi scenari per la città medioadriatica. List-ActarD, Roma-Barcellona

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cities. Architecture and society, Architecture Biennale, Venice, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lotus International 139, Landscape infrastructures, Editoriale Lotus, Milan, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gasparrini C (2011) Una nuova città: diffusione e densificazione. Report to the Seminar “Ri-conoscrere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea”. University of Camerino, Ascoli Kceno, 20 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassatella C (2011 ) Pianificare paesaggi multifunzionali: dalla scala vasta al progetto. Urbanistica 148, Inu Edizioni, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gasparrini C (2009) Nuovi racconti délia città contemporanea. Urbanistica 140, Inu Edizioni, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gambino R (2011) I temi della transizione. Report to the Seminar Ri-conoscrere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea. University of Camerino, Ascoli Kceno, 20 May 2011

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ferrara G (1968) L’architettura del paesaggio italiano. Marsilio, Padua

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 60: 587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments — healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between green space and health. Environment and Planning 35,10: 1717–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Juhász-Nagy P, Podani J (1983) Information theory methods for the study of spatial processes and succession. Plant Ecology 51(3):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Royuela V, Moreno R, Vaya E (2010) Influence of Quality of Life on Urban Growth: A case study of Barcelona, Spain. Regional Studies, 44, pp 551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Henderson J (1996) Ways to think about urban concentration: neoclassical urban systems vs. the new economic geography. International Regional Science Review, 19, pp 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camagni R, Gibelli MC, Rigamonti P (2002) Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological Economics, 40, pp 199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glaeser E, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. Journal of economic geography, 1, pp 27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheshire P, Magrini S (2006) Population growth in European city: weather matters — but only nationally. Regional Studies, 40, pp 23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro JM (2006) Smart cities: quality — of — life, productivity and the growth effects of human capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, pp 324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  1. OECD (1996) Proceedings OECD International Conference Toward Sustainable Transportation. Hull

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi JP (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Bank (1996) Sustainable transport: priorities for policy reform. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Bank (2008) Safe, clean, and affordable — transport for development. The World Bank Group’s Transport Business Strategy 2008–2012, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The geography of transport system. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Litman (2010) Evaluating transportation economic development impacts. Transport Policy Institute, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nordhaus W, Tobin J (1972) Is growth obsolete? Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandel M (2012) What money can’t buy. The moral limits of markets. Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lanza A, Pigliaru F (1999) Why Are Tourism Countries Small and Fast-Growing? Working Paper CRENoS 1999/06, Cagliari

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greene DL, Jones DW, Delucchi MA (eds) (1997). The full costs and benefits of transportation: contributions to theory, method and management. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. OECD (2006) Decoupling the environmental impacts of transport from economic growth. Paris

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. De Leone R, Di Girolamo N, Di Muro G, Marchitto E (2008) Pianificazione Programmazione e Gestione Innovativa per il Trasporto Pubblico locale. Aracne, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teal RF (1987) Carpooling: Who, how and why, Transportation Research Part A: General, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benoît R, Dallaire Y (2007) Le DUO auto + bus: une alternative attrayante à la possession automobile, Routes & Transpor Vol.36, n 2, pp 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  4. Millard-Ball A, Murray G, Ter Schure J (2005) C. Fox. Car-Sharing: Where and How it Succeeds. Transit Cooperative research Program (TCRP) Report 108. Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dial RB (1995) Autonomous Dial-A-Ride Transit Introductory Overview. Transportation Research C, n. 3, pp. 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colorni A, Righini G (2001) Modeling and optimizing dynamic Dial-A-Ride problems. International Transactions in Operational Research, 8:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Muro G (2003) Analisi delle prestazioni di sistemi avanzati d’informazione all’utenza (ATIS). Tesi Sperimentale di Laurea in Ingegneria Gestionale, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. UNHABITAT (2008) State of the World’s Cities, 2010/2012-brinding the urban divide. Earthscan, London, pp 222

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu J, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Luck GW (2003) Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421: 530–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel S, vander Ploeg S and de Groot R (2011) Benefits of ecosystem services in cities. Article to be submitted formally. In: TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2011). TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Management. www.teebweb.org

References

  1. Forman R (1997) Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nijkamp P, Perrels A (1994) Sustainable cities in Europe. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbett J, Corbett. M (2000) Designing sustainable communities: Learning from village homes. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams K, Burton E, and Jenks M (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Harvey LDD (2009) Reducing energy use in the buildings sector: measures, costs, and examples, Springer Science + Business Media BV. DOI 10.1007/s12053-009-9041-2

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. McGrawHill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nuvolati G (2007) Commuting and Quality of life: The Italian Case. In: Estes R (ed) Advancing Quality of life in a Turbulent World. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Augé M (2009) Nonluoghi. Introduzione a una antropologia della surmodernità. Eleuthera, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rahm P (2009) Architecture météorologique. Archibooks, Paris

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Cordier S (2010) Maternal residence near municipal waste incinerators and the risk of urinary tract birth defect. Occup. Environ med. 2010, 67 493-9, http://oem.bmj.com/content/67/7/493.abstract

  2. World Health Organization (2007) Population health and waste management: scientific data and policy options. Report of a WHO workshop, Rome, Italy, 29–30 March 2007, http://www.euro.who.int/document/E91021.pdf

  3. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW (1972) Rapporta sui limiti allo sviluppo. Commissioned by the Club of Rome al MIT, Mondadori

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martino R (2010) Compendio normativo per la gestione dei rifiuti e la bonifica dei siti inquinati. Maggioli, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commision (2012) Screening of waste management performance of EU Member States. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/Screening_report.pdf

  6. Ferrajoli L (1989) Diritto e Ragione. Laterza, Roma-Bari

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Aringoli D, Gentili B, Materazzi M, Pambianchi G (2010) Mass Movements in Adriatic Central Italy: Activation and Evolutive Control Factors. In: Werner ED, et al (eds) Landslides: Causes, Types and Effects. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 1–71

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huggenberger P, Epting J (eds) (2011) Urban Geology. Process-Oriented Concepts for Adaptive and Integrated Resource Management. Springer, Basel N° XVI

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Audubon Society (2004) State of the birds USA. Audubon Magazine September-October: 45-50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Environmental Protection Agency (2006) http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/2006IRG_index.cfm#documents

  3. Farina A, Meschini E (1985) Le comunità di uccelli come indicatori ecologici. Proceedings of the HI Italian Conference of Ornithology, pp. 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swarth C (2003) Biological Assesment Methods for birds. Athlantic City, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sargolini, M. (2013). Techne. Interdisciplinary Examination for an Integrated Vision. Case Study: the Adriatic City. In: Urban Landscapes. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2880-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics