Skip to main content

Standardizzare le procedure e audit

  • Chapter
  • 471 Accesses

Riassunto

La gestione del rischio clinico (Clinical Risk Management, CRM) è un processo complesso, sistematico, di identificazione, valutazione e trattamento dei rischi attuali e potenziali, comunque mai completamente prevenibili, intrinsecamente correlati all’erogazione delle prestazioni sanitarie. Il CRM si prefigge lo scopo di prevenire gli errori e diminuire gli eventi avversi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Kortgen A, Niederprüm P, Bauer M (2006) Implementation of an evidence-based “standard operating procedure” and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nachtigall I, Deja M, Tafelski S et al (2008) Adherence to standard operating procedures is crucial for intensive care unit survival of elderly patients. J Int Med Res 36:438–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parliament (1989) Working for patients. Cm 555. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cook T, Counsell D, Wildsmith J (2009) Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 102:179–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C (2011) Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 106:617–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J (2011) Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 106:632–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith R (1992) Audit and research. BMJ 305:905–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benjamin A (2008) Audit: how to do it in practice. BMJ 336:1241–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Confortini MC, Patrini E (2006) Manuale di Risk Management in sanità: processi e strumenti di implementazione. Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  10. Irvine D, Irvine S (1991) Making sense of audit. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston G, Crombie IK, Davies HT et al (2000) Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care 9:23–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT et al (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National sentinel stroke audit 2006 (2007) Prepared on behalf of the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. Royal College of Physicians, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2002) Principles of best practice in clinical audit. NICE, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dixon N (1996) Good practice in clinical audit. A summary of selected literature to support criteria for clinical audit. National Centre for Clinical Audit, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kendall JM, McCabe SE (1996) The use of audit to set up a thrombolysis programme in the accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 13:49–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parotto, M., La Guardia, P., Ori, C. (2012). Standardizzare le procedure e audit. In: Gullo, A., Murabito, P. (eds) Governo clinico e medicina perioperatoria. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2792-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2793-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics