Skip to main content

Vertebroplasty in Porotic Fractures

  • Chapter
  • 2124 Accesses

Abstract

Vertebral augmentation methods are minimally invasive and aim to reduce spinal pain in patients with porotic fractures. This is achieved thanks to endovertebral injection of cement that elicits a metameric stabilization effect. Vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) are image-guided, percutaneous minimally invasive therapies employed to reduce spinal pain. Each method has a different approach. VP involves metameric injection of cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) through a needle. KP involves inflation of a small balloon in the vertebral body (VB) to create a void within cancellous bone before the delivery of cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wong X, Reiley MA, Garfin S (2000) Vertebroplasty/ kyphoplasty. J Women’s Imaging 2:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroder R et al (2005) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic fractures of vertebral bodies: a prospective 1-year followup analysis. RöFo 177:1670–1676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Galimbert P, Deramond H, Rosat P et al (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gangi A, Guth S, Imbert JP et al (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results. Radiographics 23:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM et al (2001) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 22:373–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muijs SP, van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PD (2011) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a brief review of the evidence for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1149–1153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kallmes DF, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA et al. (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Murphy B et al (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361:557–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, van Meirhaeghe J et al (2009). Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 373:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Legrain V, Iannetti GD, Plaghki L, Mouraux A (2011) The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body. Prog Neurobiol 93:111–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mouraux A, Diukova A, Lee MC, Wise RG, Iannetti GD (2011) A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the “pain matrix”. Neuroimage 54:2237–2249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guarnieri G, Ambrosanio G, Vassallo P et al (2009) Vertebroplasty as treatment of aggressive and symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: up to 4 years of follow-up. Neuroradiology 51:471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peh WC, Gilula LA (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, and technique. Br J Radiol 76:69–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guglielmi G, Andreula C, Muto M, Gilula L (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, technique and complications. Acta Radiol 46:256–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B et al (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18:311–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambrosanio G, Lavanga A,V assallo P, Izzo R, Diano AA, Muto M. (2005) Vertebroplasty in the treatment of spine Ddisease. Interven Neuroradiol 11: 309–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JM, Lindsey DP, Hannibal M, Alamin TF (2006) Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: biomechanical behavior under repetitive loading conditions. Spine 31:2079–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilke HJ, Mehnert U, Claes LE et al. (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplastyand kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading. Spine 31:2934–2941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nouda S, Tomita S, Kin A et al. (2007) Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine. Spine 34:2613–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV et al. (2003) Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 226:119–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SH, Kang HS, Choi JA et al. (2004) Risk factors of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol 45:440–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ (2006) New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. Am J Neuroradiol 27:217–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Furtado N Oakland RJ Wilcox RK Hall RM (2007) A bioechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement. Spine 32:E480–E48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wangn JL, Chiang CK,Yang BD (2012) Mechanism of fractures of adjacentand augmented vertebrae following simulated vertebroplasty. J Biomech [In press]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC et al; The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (1999) Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. J Bone Miner Res 14:90–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Anita A, Uppin MD, Joshua A et al (2003) Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 226:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bajaj S, Saag KG (2003) Osteoporosis: evaluation and treatment. Curr Womens Health Rep 3:418–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Seeman E et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Silverman SL (1992) The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13: S27–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Voormolen MH, Lohle PN, Juttmann JR et al (2006) The risk of new osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the year after percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol;17:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guglielmi G, Andreula C, Muto M, Gilula L (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contrain dications, technique and complications. Acta Radiol 46:256–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen ME, McGraw JK, Cardella JF, Hirsch JA; American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Society of Interventional Radiology; American Association of Neurological Surgeons/ Congress of Neurological Surgeons; American Society of Spine Radiology (2007) Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1439–1443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yen CH, Teng MM, Yuan WH, Sun YC, Chang CY (2012) Preventive vertebroplasty for adjacent vertebral bodies: a good solution to reduce adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 33:826–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Masala S, Nano G, Marcia S, Muto M, Fucci FP, Simonetti G (2012) Spine Support): a prospective nonrandomized study. Neuroradiology 11 [In press]

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maestretti G, Cremer C, Otten P, Jakob RP (2007) Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J 16:601–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J et al (2007) Percutaneous pedicle screwfixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neurochirurgie 53:272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Theodoru DJ, Theodorou SJ, Duncan TD et al (2002) Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correction of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. J Clin Imaging 26:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Deramond H, Salioub G, Aveillana M et al (2006) Respective contributions of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Joint Bone Spine 73:610–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Teng MM, Wei CJ, Wei LC et al (2003) Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1893–1190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Matthew J, Parker SJ, Wolinsky JP et al (2009) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: an evidenced-based review of the literature Spine J 9:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kamalian S, Bordia R, Ortiz AO (2012) Post-vertebral augmentation back pain: evaluation and management. Am J Neuroradiol 33:370–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Anselmetti GC, Manca A, Hirsch J et al (2011) Percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic patients: an institutional experience of 1,634 patients with long-term follow-up. iJ Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1714–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Muto M, Perrotta V, Guarnieri G et al (2008) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: friends or foes? Radiol Med 113:1171–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim JH, Yoo SH, Kim JH. (2012) Long-term followup of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture: minimum of 5 years follow-up. Asian Spine J 6:6–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kotwica Z, Saracen A. (2011) Early and long-term outcomes of vertebroplasty for single osteoporotic fractures. Neurol Neurochir Pol 45:431–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A et al (2011) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: long-term evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes. Am J Roentgenol 196:1415–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Muto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muto, M., Guarnieri, G., Izzo, R., Diano, A.A. (2013). Vertebroplasty in Porotic Fractures. In: Muto, M. (eds) Interventional Neuroradiology of the Spine. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2790-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2790-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2789-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2790-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics