Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Health-Related Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Patients pp 45–59Cite as

Quality of Life in Patients After Coronary Interventional Treatment

  • Chapter

  • 917 Accesses

Abstract

A long-term goal of treating coronary artery disease (CAD) is to decrease mortality by reducing the prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) and sudden cardiac death. An immediate goal of treatment is to minimize chest pain (coronary pain, angina), increase physical tolerance, and to positively influence the quality of life (QoL) of patients by alleviating symptoms [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hlatky MA (2004) Coronary revascularization and quality of life. Am Heart J 148:5–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertuccio P, Levi F, Lucchini F et al (2011) Coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease mortality in young adults: recent trends in Europe. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 18:627–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez T, Malvezzi M, Chatenoud L et al (2006) Trends in mortality from coronary heart and cerebrovascular diseases in the Americas: 1970–2000. Heart 92:453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mommersteeg PM, Denollet J, Spertus JA, Pedersen SS (2009) Health status as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of current evidence. Am Heart J 157: 208–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie J, Wu EQ, Zheng Z-J et al (2008) Patient-reported health status in coronary heart disease in the United States. Age, sex, racial and ethnic differences. Circulation 118:491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Guyatt GH (2000) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 321:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benzer W, Hofer S, Oldridge NB (2003) Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease after different treatments for angina in routine clinical practice. Herz 28:421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Westin L, Nilstun T, Carlsson R, Erhardt L (2005) Patients with ischemic heart disease: quality of life predicts long-term mortality. Scand Cardiovasc J 39:50–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Folland ED, Hartigan PM, Parisi AF (1997) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina pectoris: outcomes for patients with double-vessel versus single-vessel coronary artery disease in a Vetrenas Affairs Cooperative randomized trial. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1505–1511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spertus JA, Salisbury AC, Jones PG et al (2004) Predictors of quality-of-life benefit after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 110:3789–3794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK et al (2007) Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 35:1503–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P et al (2008) Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 359:677–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS (2008) Finding the Courage to reconsider medical therapy for stable angina. N Engl J Med 359:751–753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holubkov R, Laskey WK, Haviland A et al (2002) Angina 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NHLBI Dynamic registry. Am Heart J 144:826–833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rihal CS, Raco DL, Gersh BJ, Yusuf S (2003) Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic stable angina: review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation 108:2439–2455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Permanyer-Miralda G, Alonso J, Brotons C et al (1999) Perceived health over 3 years after percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty. J Clin Epidemiol 52:615–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed A et al (1996) Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery: 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation 94:135–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nash IS, Curtis LH, Rubin H (1999) Predictors of patient-reported physical and mental health 6 months after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Am Heart J 138:422–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de Quadros AS, Lima TC, Rodrigues AP et al (2011) Quality of life and health status after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina patients: results from the real-world practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:954–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The TIME Investigators (2001) Trial of Invasive versus Medical Therapy in Elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomized trial. Lancet 358:951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buser MA, Buser PT, Kuster GM et al (2008) Improvements in physical and mental domains of quality of life by anti-ischaemic drug and revascularization treatment in elderly men and women with chronic angina. Heart 94:1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC et al (2003) Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial trail: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1161–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfisterer M for the TAIM Investigators (2004) Long-term outcome in elderly patients with chronic angina managed invasively versus by optimized medical therapy. Four-year follow-up of the Randomized Trial of Invasive versus Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients (TIME). Circulation 110:1213–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seto TB, Taira DA, Berezin R et al (2000) Percutaneous coronary revascularization in elderly patients: impact on functional status and quality of life. Ann Intern Med 132:955–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li R, Yan BP, Dong M et al (2012) Quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 155:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schenkeveld L, Pedersen SS, Nierop JWI et al (2010) Health-related quality of life and long-term mortality in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 159:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedersen SS, Versteeg H, Denollet J et al (2011) Patient-rated health status predicts prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stentiong. Qual Life Res 20:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park D-W, Yun S-C, Lee S-W et al (2008) Long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 117:2079–2086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Melsop KA et al (2004) Medical costs and quality of life 10 to 12 years after randomization to angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 110:1960–1966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Z, Mahoney EM, Stables RH et al (2003) Disease-specific health status following stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery: 1-year results from the Stent or Surgery trial. Circulation 108:1694–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Favarato ME, Hueb W, Boden WE et al (2007) Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial. Intern J Cardiol 116:364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa E et al (2001) Comparison of coronary-artery-bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 344:1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Z, Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM et al (2004) Relative benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention for angina pectoris and multivessel coronary artery disease in women versus men (one-year results from the Stent or Surgery Trial). Am J Cardiol 93:404–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Serruys PW, Ong ATL, Morice M-C et al (2005) Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study Part II — sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions. EuroIntervention 1:147–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Daemen J, Kuck KH, Macaya C et al (2008) Multivessel coronary revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1957–1967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van Domburg RT, Daemen J, Morice MC et al (2010) Short-and long-term health related quality-of-life and anginal status of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study part II, ARTS-II; sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Euro Intervention 5:962–967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cohen DJ, Van Hout B, Serruys PW et al (2011) Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Investigators. Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 364:1016–1026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kapetanakis EI, Stamou SC, Petro KR et al (2008) Comparison of the quality of life after conventional versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 23:120–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Navia D, Vrancic M, Vaccarino G et al (2008) Total arterial off-pump coronary revascularization using bilateral thoracic arteries in triple-vessel disease: surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 86:524–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dias CC, Mateus P, Santos L et al (2005) Acute coronary syndrome and predictors of quality of life. Rev Port Cardiol 24:819–831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Janzon M, Levin LA, Swahn E (2004) Invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease promotes health-related quality of life: results from the FRISC II trial. Am Heart J 148:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim J, Henderson RA, Pocock SJ et al (2005) Health-related quality of life after inteventional or conservative strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. One-year results of the Third Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable Angina (RITA-3). J Am Coll Cardiol 45:221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ho MP, Eng MH, Rumsfeld JS et al (2008) The influence of age on health status outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 155:855–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shah P, Najafi AH, Panza JA et al (2009) Outcomes and quality of life in patients ≥ 85 years of age with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 103:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC, Stewart DE et al (2008) Usefulness of persistent symptoms of depression to predict physical health status 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 101:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 29:2909–2945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC, Stewart DE et al (2008) Physical health status assessed during hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome predicts mortality 12 month later. J Psychosom Res 65:587–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Peterson PN, Spertus JA, Magid JD et al (2006) The impact of diabetes on one-year health status outcomes following acute coronary syndromes. BMC Cardiovasc Dis 6:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD et al (2001) One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 285:190–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sleeper LA, Ramanathan K, Picard MH et al (2005) Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:266–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. I Department of Cardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

    Leszek Bryniarski

Authors
  1. Leszek Bryniarski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Klocek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leszek Bryniarski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. I Department of Cardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

    Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz (Professor of Cardiology and Internal Medicine) & Marek Klocek (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine) (Professor of Cardiology and Internal Medicine) &  (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine)

  2. Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

    Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk (Professor of Sociology, Chair) (Professor of Sociology, Chair)

  3. Medicine Experimental Medicine (Care of the Elderly), Division of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK

    Christopher J. Bulpitt (Professor of Geriatric and Cardiovascular) (Professor of Geriatric and Cardiovascular)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryniarski, L., Klocek, M. (2013). Quality of Life in Patients After Coronary Interventional Treatment. In: Kawecka-Jaszcz, K., Klocek, M., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Bulpitt, C.J. (eds) Health-Related Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Patients. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2769-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2769-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2768-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2769-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation