Riassunto
Le applicazioni dell’uso del mezzo di contrasto (mdc) di II generazione in ambito puramente renale riguardano le seguenti patologie: ischemica, traumatica, flogistica ed espansiva (comprendendo in quest’ultima sia le formazioni di aspetto cistico che quelle solide).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Siracusano S, Bertolotto M, Ciciliato S et al (2011) The current role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in the evaluation of renal pathology. World J Urol 29:633–638
Bertolotto M, Martegani A, Aiani L et al (2008) Value of contrastenhanced ultrasonography for detecting renal infarcts proven by contrast enhanced CT-a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 18:376–383
Nicolau C, Ripollés T (2011) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominal imaging. Abdom Imaging 37:1–19
Setola SV, Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Siani A (2007) Contrastenhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 32:21–28
Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33:33–59
Valentino M, Serra C, Zironi G et al (2006) Blunt abdominal trauma: emergency contrast-enhanced sonography for detection of solid organ injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1361–1367
Regine G, Atzori M, Miele V et al (2007) Second-generation sonographic contrast agents in the evaluation of renal trauma. Radiol Med 112:581–587
Valentino M, Ansaloni L, Catena F et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: considerations after 5 years of experience. Radiol Med 114:1080–1193
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44
Sebastia C, Quiroga S, Boyè R et al (2001) Helical CT in renal transplantation: normal findings and early and late complications. Radiographics 21:1103–1117
Allan PL, Dubbins PA, Pozniak MA et al (2006) Doppler ultrasound evaluation of transplantation. In: Allan PL, Dubbins PA, Pozniak MA et al (eds) Clinical doppler ultrasound, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Philadelphia
Brown ED, Chen MY, Wolfman NT et al (2000) Complications of renal transplantation: evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging. Radiographics 20:607–622
Akbar SA, Jafri SZ, Amendola MA et al (2005) Complications of renal transplantation. Radiographics 25:1335–1356
Wilson SR, Burns PN (2010) Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 257:24–39
Quaia E (2007) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 17:1995–2008
Schwenger V, Korosoglou G, Hinkel UP et al (2006) Real-time contrast-enhanced sonography of renal transplant recipients predicts chronic allograft nephropathy. Am J Transplant 6:609–615
Fontanilla T, Minaya J, Cortes C et al (2011) Acute complicated pyelonephritis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging [Epub ahead of print]
Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Colleselli D et al (2008) Acute pyelonephritis: comparison of diagnosis with computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. BJU Int 101:341–344
Prakash A, Tan GJ, Wansaicheong GK (2011) Contrast enhanced ultrasound of kidneys. Pictorial essay. Med Ultrason 13:150–156
Gerst S, Hamm LE, Li D et al (2011) Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:897–906
Ignee A, Straub B, Schuessler G et al (2010) Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses. World J Radiology 2:15–31
Quaia E, Bussani R, Cova M et al (2005) Radiologic-pathologic correlations of intratumoral tissue components in the most common solid and cystic renal tumors. Pictorial review. Eur Radiol 15:1734–1744
Xu HX (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the evolving applications. World J Radiology 1:15–24
Siracusano S, Quaia E, Bertolotto M et al (2004) The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the characterization of renal tumors. World J Urol 22:316–322
Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Zhang H (2010) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size. Eur J Radiol 73:162–167
Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna P et al (2007) Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study. J Endourol 21:466–472
Xu ZF, Xu HX, Xie XY et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma: differential diagnosis with real time contrast enhanced ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 29:709–717
Fan L, Lianfang D, Jinfang X et al (2008) Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in solid renal parenchymal lesions with maximum diameters of 5 cm. J Ultrasound Med 27:875–885
Roy C, Gengler L, Sauer B, Lang H (2008) Role of contrast enhanced US in the evaluation of renal tumors. J Radiol 89:1735–1744
Tamai H, Takiguchi Y, Oka M et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors. J Ultrasound Med 24:1635–1640
Xu ZF, Xu HX, Xie XY et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma: real time contrast enhanced ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging 35:750–756
Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G et al (2007) Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced. Radiology 243:158–165
Nicolau C, Bunesch L, Sebastia C (2011) Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 36:742–752
Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH et al (2007) Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 61:310–314
Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 236:441–450
Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V et al (2008) Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. Am J Roentgenol 191:1239–1249
Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Weckbach S et al (2008) Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 39:171–178
Bhatt S, MacLennan G, Dogra V (2007) Renal Pseudotumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1380–1387
Regine G, Atzori M, Danza FM (2010) Malformazioni del rene e delle vie urinary. In: Blandino A, Danza FM, Menchi I et al (eds) Imaging dell’apparato urogenitale. Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano, pp 13–24
Mazziotti S, Zimbaro F, Pandolfo A et al (2010) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Abdom Imaging 35:241–245
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Regine, G., Atzori, M., Fabbri, R. (2012). Rene. In: Ecocontrastografia dell’apparato urinario. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2718-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2718-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2717-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2718-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)