Skip to main content

Interactions and Field Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Particle and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Quantum field theories are a theoretical framework for constructing models describing particles and their interactions. The dynamics of a system can be determined starting from the Lagrangian of an interaction through canonical equations. This chapter introduces the basic formalism, illustrates the relation between symmetries of the Lagrangian and conserved quantities, and finally describes the Lagrangian for the most relevant interactions at the particle level: the electromagnetic interaction (QED), the weak interaction, and the strong interaction.

Quantum field theories are a theoretical framework for constructing models describing particles and their interactions. The dynamics of a system can be determined starting from the Lagrangian of an interaction through canonical equations. This chapter introduces the basic formalism, illustrates the relation between symmetries of the Lagrangian and conserved quantities, and finally describes the Lagrangian for the most relevant interactions at the particle level: the electromagnetic interaction (QED), the weak interaction, and the strong interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alexandru Proca (1897–1955) was a Romanian physicist who studied and worked in France (he was a student of Louis de Broglie). He developed the vector meson theory of nuclear forces and worked on relativistic quantum field equations.

  2. 2.

    David Bohm (1917–1992) was an American scientist who contributed innovative and unorthodox ideas to quantum theory, neuropsychology, and the philosophy of mind. Yakir Aharonov (1932) is an Israeli physicist specialized in quantum physics, interested in quantum field theories and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

  3. 3.

    Chen Yang (1922) is a Chinese-born American physicist who works on statistical mechanics and particle physics. He shared the 1957 Nobel prize in physics with T.D. Lee for their work on parity non-conservation in weak interactions. While working with the US physicist Robert Mills (1927–1999) at Brookhaven National Laboratory, in 1954 he proposed a tensor equation for what are now called Yang–Mills fields.

  4. 4.

    Hendrick Casimir (1909–2000) was a Dutch physicist mostly known for his works on superconductivity.

  5. 5.

    The electromagnetic decay \({\mu }^-\rightarrow \ e^-\gamma \) violates the lepton family number and was never observed: \( {\Gamma }_{{\mu }^-\rightarrow \ e^-\gamma }/{\Gamma }_{\mathrm{tot}}<5.7\cdot 10^{-13}\).

  6. 6.

    Nicola Cabibbo (1935–2010) was a professor in Rome, and president of the Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN). He gave fundamental contributions to the development of the standard model.

  7. 7.

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1980 was awarded to James (“Jim”) Cronin and Val Fitch “for the discovery of violations of fundamental symmetry principles in the decay of neutral K-mesons”. Cronin (Chicago 1931) received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1955. He then worked at Brookhaven National Laboratory, in 1958 became a professor at Princeton University, and finally in Chicago. Later he moved to astroparticle physics, being with Alan Watson the founder of the Auger cosmic ray observatory. Fitch (Merriman, Nebraska, 1923—Princeton 2015) was interested in chemistry and he switched to physics in the mid-1940s when he participated to the Manhattan Project. Ph.D. in physics by Columbia University in 1954, he later moved to Princeton.

  8. 8.

    The BaBar detector was a cylindrical detector located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in California. Electrons at an energy of 9 GeV collided with 3.1 GeV antielectrons to produce a center-of-mass collision energy of 10.58 GeV, corresponding to the \(\Upsilon \)(4S) resonance. The \(\Upsilon \)(4S) decays into a pair of B mesons, charged or neutral. The detector had the classical “onion-like” structure, starting from a Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) detecting the decay vertex, passing through a Cherenkov detector for particle identification, and ending with an electromagnetic calorimeter. A magnet produced a 1.5 T field allowing momentum measurement. BaBar analyzed some 100 million \(B\bar{B}\) events, being a kind of “B factory”.

  9. 9.

    The CKMfitter group provides once or twice per year an updated analysis of standard model measurements and average values for the CKM matrix parameters.

  10. 10.

    This formulation of QCD in discrete rather than continuous spacetime allows pushing momentum cut-offs for calculations to the lowest values, below the hadronization scale; however, lattice QCD is computationally very expensive, requiring the use of the largest available supercomputers.

  11. 11.

    Rapidity is also a useful variable also for the study of electron–positron collisions. However there is nothing special in that case about the beam direction, apart from the \((1+\cos \theta ^2)\) dependence of the jet axis; rapidity in \(e^+e^-\) is thus usually defined with respect to the \(q\bar{q}\) axis, and it still has, for 2-jet events, the property that the distribution of final state hadrons is approximately uniform in rapidity.

  12. 12.

    Roy Jay Glauber (New York, 1925) is an American physicist, recipient of the 2005 Nobel Prize “for his contribution to the quantum theory of optical coherence,” a fundamental contribution to the field of quantum optics. For many years before, Glauber participated to the organization of the Ig Nobel Prize: he had the role of “keeper of the broom,” sweeping the paper airplanes thrown during the event out from the stage.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro De Angelis .

Appendices

Further Reading

  1. [F6.1]

    M. Thomson, “Modern Particle Physics,” Cambridge University Press 2013. A recent, pedagogical and rigorous book covering the main aspects of particle physics at advanced undergraduate and early graduate level.

  2. [F6.2]

    A. Bettini, “Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics” (second edition), Cambridge University Press 2014. A good introduction to Particle Physics at the undergraduate level starting from the experimental aspects and deeply discussing relevant experiments.

  3. [F6.3]

    D. Griffiths, “Introduction to Elementary Particles” (second edition), Wiley-VCH 2008. A reference book at the undergraduate level with many proposed problems at the end of each chapter; rather oriented on the theoretical aspects.

  4. [F6.4]

    S. Gasiorowicz, “Quantum Physics” (third edition), Wiley 2003. Provides a concise and solid introduction to quantum mechanics. It is very useful for students that had already been exposed to the subject.

  5. [F6.5]

    I.J.R. Aitchison, A.J.G. Hey, “Gauge Theories in Particle Physics: A Practical Introduction” (fourth edition—2 volumes), CRC Press, 2012. Provides a pedagogical and complete discussion on gauge field theories in the Standard Model of Particle Physics from QED (vol. 1) to electroweak theory and QCD (vol. 2).

Exercises

  1. 1.

    Spinless particles interaction. Determine, in the high-energy limit, the electromagnetic differential cross section between two spinless charged nonidentical particles.

  2. 2.

    Dirac equation invariance. Show that the Dirac equation written using the covariant derivative is gauge-invariant.

  3. 3.

    Bhabha scattering. Draw the QED Feynman diagrams at low order for the elastic \(e^+e^-\) scattering and discuss why the Bhabha scattering measurements at LEP are done at very small polar angle.

  4. 4.

    Bilinear covariants. Show that

    1. (a)

      \(\overline{\psi }\psi \) is a scalar;

    2. (b)

      \(\overline{\psi }{\gamma }^5\psi \) is a pseudoscalar;

    3. (c)

      \(\overline{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }\psi \) is a four-vector;

    4. (d)

      \(\overline{\psi }{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^5\psi \) is a pseudo four-vector.

  5. 5.

    Chirality and helicity. Show that the right helicity eigenstate \(u_{\uparrow }\) can be decomposed in the right (\(u_R\)) and left \((u_L\)) chiral states as follows:

    $$ {u_{\uparrow }=\frac{1}{2}\left( 1+\frac{p}{E+m}\right) \ u_R+\ \frac{1}{2}\left( 1-\frac{p}{E+m}\right) u_L} \, . $$
  6. 6.

    \({{\varvec{\nu }}}_{{\varvec{\mu }}}\) neutrino beams. Consider a beam of \({\nu }_{\mu }\) produced through the decay of a primary beam containing pions (90 %) and kaons (10 %). The primary beam has a momentum of 10 GeV and an intensity of 10\({}^{10}\) s\({}^{-1}\).

    1. (a)

      Determine the number of pions and kaons that will decay in a tunnel 100 m long.

    2. (b)

      Determine the energy spectrum of the decay products.

    3. (c)

      Calculate the contamination of the \({\nu }_{\mu }\) beam, i.e., the fraction of \({\nu }_{{e}}\) present in that beam.

  7. 7.

    \({{\varvec{\nu }}}_{{\varvec{\mu }}}\) semileptonic interaction. Considering the process \({\nu }_{\mu }p\longrightarrow {\mu }^-X\):

    1. (a)

      Discuss what X could be (start by computing the available energy in the center-of-mass).

    2. (b)

      Write the amplitude at lower order for the process for the interaction of the \({\nu }_{\mu }\) with the valence quark d (\({\nu }_{\mu }d\longrightarrow {\mu }^-u\)).

    3. (c)

      Compute the effective energy in the center-of-mass for this process supposing that the energy of the \({\nu }_{\mu }\) is 10 GeV and the produced muon takes 5 GeV and is detected at an angle of 10\(^{\circ }\) with the \({\nu }_{\mu }\) beam.

    4. (d)

      Write the cross section of the process \({\nu }_{\mu }p\longrightarrow {\mu }^-X\) as a function of the elementary cross section \({\nu }_{\mu }d\longrightarrow {\mu }^-u\).

  8. 8.

    Neutrino and anti-neutrino deep inelastic scattering. Determine, in the framework of the quark parton model, the ratio:

    $$ \frac{\sigma \left( {\overline{\nu }}_{\mu }N\longrightarrow {\mu }^+X\right) }{\sigma \left( {\nu }_{\mu }N\longrightarrow {\mu }^-X\right) } $$

    where N stands for an isoscalar (same number of protons and neutrons) nucleus. Consider that the involved energies are much higher than the particle masses. Take into account only diagrams with valence quarks.

  9. 9.

    Top pair production. Consider the pair production of the top/anti-top quarks in a proton-antiproton collider. Draw the dominant first-order Feynman diagram for this reaction and estimate what should be the minimal beam energy of a collider to make the process happen. Discuss which channels have a clear experimental signature.

  10. 10.

    c-quark decay. Consider the decay of the c quark. Draw the dominant first-order Feynman diagrams of this decay and express the corresponding decay rates as a function of the muon decay rate and of the Cabibbo angle. Make an estimation of the c quark lifetime knowing that the muon lifetime is about 2.2 \(\upmu \)s.

  11. 11.

    Gray disk model in proton–proton interactions. Determine, in the framework of the gray disk model, the mean radius and the opacity of the proton as a function of the center-of-mass energy (you can use Fig. 6.70 to extract the total and the elastic proton–proton cross sections).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Angelis, A., Pimenta, M.J.M. (2015). Interactions and Field Theories. In: Introduction to Particle and Astroparticle Physics. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2688-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics