Skip to main content

Particles and Symmetries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Introduction to Particle and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Symmetry simplifies the description of physical phenomena, in such a way that humans can understand them: the Latin word for “understanding,” capire, means “to contain”; and as we are a part of it we cannot contain the full Universe, unless we find a way to reduce its complexity–this is the meaning of symmetry. Symmetry plays a particularly important role in particle physics. The key mathematical framework for symmetry is group theory: symmetry transformations form groups. Although the symmetries of a physical system are not sufficient to fully describe its behavior—for this purpose, one needs a complete dynamical theory—it is possible to use symmetry to discover fundamental properties of a system. Examples of symmetries include space-time symmetries, internal symmetries of particles, and the so-called gage symmetries of field theories.

Symmetry simplifies the description of physical phenomena, in such a way that humans can understand them: the Latin word for “understanding,” capire, means “to contain”; and as we are a part of it we cannot contain the full Universe, unless we find a way to reduce its complexity–this is the meaning of symmetry. Symmetry plays a particularly important role in particle physics. The key mathematical framework for symmetry is group theory: symmetry transformations form groups. Although the symmetries of a physical system are not sufficient to fully describe its behavior—for this purpose, one needs a complete dynamical theory—it is possible to use symmetry to discover fundamental properties of a system. Examples of symmetries include space-time symmetries, internal symmetries of particles, and the so-called gage symmetries of field theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Emmy Noether (1882–1935)Noether, Emmy was a German mathematician. After dismissing her original plan to become a teacher in foreign languages, she studied mathematics at the University of Erlangen, where her father was a professor. After graduating in 1907, she worked for seven years as an unpaid assistant (at the time women could not apply for academic positions). In 1915, she joined the University of Göttingen, thanks to an invitation by David Hilbert and Felix Klein, but the faculty did not allow her to receive a salary and she worked four years unpaid. In that time, she published her famous theorem. Finally, Noether moved to the US to take up a college professorship in Philadelphia, where she died at the age of 53.

  2. 2.

    Here, we are indeed cutting a long story short; we address the interested readers to a textbook in quantum physics to learn what is behind this fundamental point.

  3. 3.

    K. Niu and collaborators had already published candidates for charm (no such name was ascribed to this new quark at that time) in emulsion as early as 1971. These results, taken seriously in Japan, were not accepted as evidence for the discovery of charm by the majority of the US and European scientific communities. Once again, cosmic-ray physics was the pathfinder.

  4. 4.

    The problem of the determination of the quark masses is not trivial. We can define as a “current” quark mass the mass entering in the Lagrangian (or Hamiltonian) representation of a hadron; this comes out to be of the order of some MeV/\(c^2\) for u, d quarks, and \(\sim \)0.2 GeV/\(c^2\) for s quarks. However, the strong field surrounds the quarks in such a way that they acquire a “constituent ”(effective) quark mass including the equivalent of the color field; this comes out to be of the order of some 300 MeV/\(c^2\) for u, d quarks, and \(\sim \)0.5 GeV/\(c^2\) for s quarks. Current quark masses are almost the same as constituent quark mass for the heavy quarks.

  5. 5.

    Robert Hofstadter (1915–1990)Hofstadter, Robert was an American physicist. He was awarded the 1961 Nobel Prize in Physics “for his pioneering studies of electron scattering in atomic nuclei and for his consequent discoveries concerning the structure of nucleons.” He worked at Princeton before joining Stanford University, where he taught from 1950 to 1985. In 1948, Hofstadter patented the thallium activated NaI gamma-ray detector, still one of the most used radiation detectors. He coined the name “fermi,” symbol fm, for the scale of 10\(^{-15}\) m. During his last years, Hofstadter became interested in astrophysics and participated to the design of the EGRET gamma-ray space telescope (see Chap. 10).

  6. 6.

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1990 was assigned to Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall and Richard E. TaylorFriedman, Jerome I. Kendall, Henry W. Taylor, Richard E. “for their pioneering investigations concerning deep inelastic scattering of electrons on protons and bound neutrons, which have been of essential importance for the development of the quark model in particle physics.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro De Angelis .

Appendices

Further Reading

  1. [F5.1]

    S. Haywood, “Symmetries and Conservation laws in Particle Physics: an introduction to group theory for experimental physicists” Imperial College Press 2011. An excellent introduction to group theory and its application in particle physics.

  2. [F5.2]

    A. Bettini, “Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics,” Cambridge University Press 2014. A good introduction to Particle Physics at the undergraduate level putting together experimental and theoretical aspects and discussing basic and relevant experiments

  3. [F5.3]

    M. Thomson, “Modern Particle Physics,” Cambridge University Press, 2013. A recent, pedagogical and rigorous book covering the main aspects of Particle Physics at advanced undergraduate and early graduate level.

  4. [F5.4]

    PDG 2014, K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 38, 090001 (2014). URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov/. This is also the most quoted reference in this book.

Exercises

  1. 1.

    Compute the kinematic threshold of the reaction \(pp\rightarrow ppp\bar{p}\) in a fixed target experiment.

  2. 2.

    Why is the hypothesis that the neutron is a bound state of electron and proton is inconsistent with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle?

  3. 3.

    Demonstrate that if \(\hat{A}\) and \(\hat{B}\) are two operators the relation 5.13 holds:

    $$ \exp \left( \hat{A}{ +}\hat{B}\right) =\exp \left( \frac{1}{2}\left[ \hat{A},\hat{B}\right] \right) \exp (\hat{A})\ \exp (\hat{B}) \, . $$
  4. 4.

    Cross sections and isospin. Determine the ratio of the following interactions cross sections at the \(\Delta {}^{++}\) resonance:

    \(\pi {}^{-}p \rightarrow K^{0}\Sigma {}^{0 };\) \(\pi {}^{-}p \rightarrow K^{+}\Sigma ^{-};\) \(\pi ^{+}p \rightarrow K^{+}\Sigma {}^{+}.\)

  5. 5.

    Decay branching ratios and isospin. Consider the decays of the \(\Sigma {}^{*0}\) into \(\Sigma {}^{+}\pi {}^{-}\), \(\Sigma {}^{0}\pi {}^{0}\) and \(\Sigma {}^{-}\pi {}^{+}\). Determine the ratios between the decay rates in these decay channels.

  6. 6.

    Quantum numbers. Verify if the following reactions/decays are possible and if not say why:

    1. (a)

      \(pp\rightarrow \pi {}^{+}\pi {}^{-}\pi {}^{0}\),

    2. (b)

      \(pp\rightarrow ppn\),

    3. (c)

      \(pp\rightarrow ppp \bar{p}\),

    4. (d)

      \(p\bar{p}\rightarrow \) \(\gamma \),

    5. (e)

      \(\pi {}^{-}p \rightarrow K^{0}\Lambda \),

    6. (f)

      \(n \rightarrow p e^{-}\nu \),

    7. (g)

      \(\Lambda \rightarrow \) \(\pi {}^{-}p\),

    8. (h)

      \(e{}^{-}\) \(\rightarrow \) \(\nu {}_{e}\) \(\gamma \, .\)

  7. 7.

    \({\Omega }{}^{-}\) mass. Verify the relations between the masses of all the particles lying in the fundamental baryon decuplet but the \({\Omega }{}^{- }\)and predict the mass of this one. Compare your prediction with the measured value.

  8. 8.

    Experimental resolution in deep inelastic scattering. Consider an \(e^-p\) deep inelastic scattering experiment where the electron scattering angle is \(\sim \)6\(^\circ \). Make an estimation of the experimental resolution in the measurement of the energy of the scattered electron that is needed to distinguish the elastic channel (\(e^{-}p \rightarrow e^{-}p\)) from the first inelastic channel (\(e^{-}p \rightarrow {e^{-}p} \pi ^{0}\)).

  9. 9.

    e \({}^{-}p\) deep inelastic scattering kinematics. Consider the \(e{}^{-}p\) deep inelastic scattering and deduce the following formula:

    $$\begin{aligned} Q{}^{2 }= 4 E E' \sin ^{2}(\theta /2) \end{aligned}$$
    $$\begin{aligned} Q{}^{2 }= 2 M{}_{p} \nu \end{aligned}$$
    $$\begin{aligned} Q{}^{2 }= x y (s{}^{2}-y{}^{2}) \, . \end{aligned}$$
  10. 10.

    Gottfried sum rule. Deduce in the framework of the quark-parton model the Gottfried sum rule

    $$\begin{aligned} \int \frac{1}{x} \left( F_{2}^{ep} \left( x\right) -F_{2}^{ep} \left( x\right) \right) dx=\frac{1}{3} +\frac{2}{3} \int \left( \bar{u}(x)-\bar{d}(x)\right) dx \end{aligned}$$

    and comment the fact that the value measured in e \({}^{-}\) p and e \({}^{-}\) d deep inelastic elastic scattering experiments is approximately 1/4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Angelis, A., Pimenta, M.J.M. (2015). Particles and Symmetries. In: Introduction to Particle and Astroparticle Physics. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2688-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics