Abstract
Minimally invasive liver surgery is growing worldwide. To date, more than 3,000 cases of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) have been published, and the interest in robot-assisted resections (RAR) is rising [1–9]. Indications for LLR are similar to those of open liver resections, as recently stated in the Louisville Statement Consensus Conference [2]. LLR was initially indicated for benign and peripherally located lesions, suggesting a concern about the safety and oncologic effectiveness of these procedures. In the last few years, the number of laparoscopic complex liver resections has increased, and even major hepatectomies and segmentectomies of the posterosuperior (PS) segments have been successfully performed [10, 11]. Recently, robotics was introduced into general surgery with the aim of overcoming some of the limitations associated with traditional laparoscopy, thus providing greater manueverability with a set of articulated instruments and a tridimensional vision [12, 13]. The first application of robotics in liver surgery dates back to 2008, when Choi et al. published their first series of four left lateral sectionectomies [14]. After this report, a few case series were published showing the feasibility of robot-assisted minor and major liver resections [5–8, 15–17] and — to date — there is only one prospective comparative study [17]: Berber at al. compared nine patients undergoing RAR matched with 23 patients undergoing LLR. However, the study has some limitations, including small sample size. One inclusion criteria was tumor location in the peripheral liver segments, precluding arriving at definitive conclusions on possible advantages of RAR in situations considered demanding with a laparoscopic approach. Some technical aspects preclude investigating the real role of the da Vinci robotic system in liver resection. The on-table assistant carried out parenchymal division using the Harmonic Scalpel, making it impossible to analyze differences related to the use of the robotic endowristed instruments. Therefore, as of yet, we have no high level of evidence in favor of RAR over LLR, and the associated considerations of the authors regarding this issue come from published case series and their personal experiences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ardito F, Tayar C, Laurent A et al (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease. Arch Surg 142(12):1188–1193.doi:142/12/1188 [pii] 10.1001/archsurg.142.12.1188
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830
Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S et al (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248(3):475–486.doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e647 00000658-200809000-00014 [pii
Nguyen KT, Laurent A, Dagher I et al (2009) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg 250(5):842–848. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc789c
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A et al (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146(7):844–850. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.145
Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted one-stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):450–457. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0073-y
Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25(12):3815–3824. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1796-9
Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 17(1):23–30. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-9047-8
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df
Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144(1):32–38. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.020
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777
Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC et al (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40(8):1264–1270. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e318220e3a4
Choi SB, Park JS, Kim JK et al (2008) Early experiences of robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. Yonsei Med J 49(4):632–638. doi:10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.632
Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H et al (2012) Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Transpl Int 25(1):e5–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01373.x
Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM etal (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff4601
Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00234.x
Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY et al (2012) Laparoscopic approach for treatment of multiple hepatocellular carcinomas. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2304-6
Topal H, Tiek J, Aerts R, Topal B (2012) Outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection for colorectal metastases. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2209-4
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Addeo P (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic extended right hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn A 20(2):159–163.doi:10.1089/lap.2009.0383
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Casciola, L., Patriti, A. (2013). Indications to Surgery: Laparoscopic or Robotic Approach. In: Calise, F., Casciola, L. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Liver. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2664-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2664-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2663-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2664-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)