Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sepsis and Septic Shock

  • Chapter
Body Fluid Management

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock are major health issues involving millions of people worldwide each year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis (1992) Crit Care Med 20:864–74

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rippe JM, Irwin RS, Cerra FB (1999) Irwin and Rippe’s intensive care medicine. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsiotou AG, Sakorafas GH, Anagnostopoulos G, Bramis J (March 2005) Septic shock; current pathogenetic concepts from a clinical perspective. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 11:RA76–85

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dellinger RP et al (2008) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 36:296–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM et al, for the International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee (2008) Surviving Sepsis Campaign. International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med Vol. 36, No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rajnish KJ et al (2004) Albumin: an overview of its place in current clinical practice. J Indian An

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trof RJ, Sukul SP, Twisk JWR, Girbes ARJ, Groeneveld ABJ (2010) Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia. Intensive Care Med 36:697–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Heijden M, Verheij J, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Groeneveld AB (2009) Crystalloid or colloid fluid loading and pulmonary permeability, edema, and injury in septic and nonseptic critically ill patients with hypovolemia. Crit Care Med 37:1275–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunkhorst FM, Englel C, Bloos F et al (2008) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 358:125–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The SAFE Study Investigators (2011) Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 37:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayer O, Reinhart K, Sakr Y et al (2011) Renal effects of synthetic colloids and crystalloids in patients with severe sepsis: A prospective sequential comparison. Crit Care Med Vol. 39, No. 6

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wills BA, Nguyen MD, Ha TL et al (2005) Comparison of three fluid solutions for resuscitation in dengue shock syndrome. N Engl J Med 353:877–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakr Y et al (2007) Effects of hydroxyethyl starch administration on renal function in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 98:216–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schortgen F, Lacherade JC, Bruneel F, Cattaneo I, Hemery F, Lemaire F, Brochard L (2001) Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised study. Lancet 357:911–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanloeil Y, Trossaërt M, Rigal JC, Rozec B (2002) Effects of plasma substitutes on hemostasis. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 21:648–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiedermann CJ (2008) Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis. BMC Emerg Med 8:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitra S, Khandelwal P (2009) Are all colloids same? How to select the right colloid? Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 53:592–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang K, Boldt J, Suttner S, Haisch G (2001) Colloids versus crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 93:405–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Neff TA, Fischler L, Mark M, Stocker R, Reinhart WH (2005) The influence of two different hydroxyethyl starch solutions (6% HES 130/0.4 and 200/0.5) on blood viscosity. Anesth Analg 100:1773–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Libert N, de Rudnicki S, Cirodde A, Thepenier C, Mion G (2010) Il y a-t-il une place pour le serum sale hypertonique dans les etats septiques graves? Annales Francaises d’Anesthesie et de Reanimation 29:25–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dellinger RP et al (2008) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 36:296–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurnani PK et al (2010) Impact of the implementation of a sepsis protocol for the management of fluid-refractory septic shock: A single-center, before-and-after study. Clin Ther 32:1285–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Micek ST et al (2006) Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:2707–2713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kortgen A et al (2006) Implementation of an evidence-based “standard operating procedure” and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Machado FR et al (2010) Improving mortality in sepsis: analysis of clinical trials. Shock 34Suppl 1:54–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Durairaj L et al (2008) Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more. Chest 133:252–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Antonelli M et al (2007 Apr) Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27–28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 33:575–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones AE et al (2008) The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 36:2734–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Agrò FE, Benedetto U, Cocomello L, Benedetto M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the comparison between hemodynamic optimization versus standard care in non-surgical critically ill patients. Submitted

    Google Scholar 

  30. Perner A, Haase N, Wetterslev J et al, the Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group (2011) Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S — Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock trial): Study protocol, design and rationale for a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Trials 12:24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Groeneveld ABJ, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM (2011) Update on the Comparative Safety of Colloids: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Ann Surg 253:470–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hartog CS, Bauer M, Reinhart K (2011) The Efficacy and Safety of Colloid Resuscitation in the Critically Ill. Anesth Analg 112:156–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesia Department, University School of Medicine Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Rita Cataldo (Director)

Authors
  1. Rita Cataldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marialuisa Vennari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felice Eugenio Agrò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Cataldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, University School of Medicine Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Felice Eugenio Agrò MD (Commander to the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic, Full Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Chairman of Postgraduate School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Director of Anesthesia) (Commander to the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic, Full Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Chairman of Postgraduate School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Director of Anesthesia)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cataldo, R., Vennari, M., Agrò, F.E. (2013). Sepsis and Septic Shock. In: Agrò, F.E. (eds) Body Fluid Management. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2661-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2661-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2660-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2661-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation