Skip to main content

Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Variable Lower Pole Support

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter puts forward the case for controlled support of a definitive, fixed-volume or shaped-adjustable implant for improved, long-term cosmesis in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Support is provided by either an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or a deepithelialized lower pole dermal sling (LPS). We discuss the surgical considerations for an optimal skin-sparing mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, or skin-reducing mastectomy and the correct selection of the most appropriate lower pole support and implant to produce a good result. Specific techniques of pocket construction are discussed for both ADM-based and LPS-based pockets, with particular emphasis on how to define the inframammary fold and the lateral mammary fold. The chapter ends by outlining the early and delayed complications and experience with the techniques described as well as suggested strategies (including optimizing radiotherapy planning, delayed fat grafting) for successful management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salgrello M, Seccia A, Eugenio F (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction with anatomical permanent expandable implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: aesthetic and technical refinements. Ann Plast Surg 52:358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spear SL (1998) Editorial comment. Adjustable implant reconstruction. In: Spear SL (ed) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 373–374

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eskenazi LB (2007) New options for immediate reconstruction: achieving optimal results with adjustable implants in a single stage. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:28–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC et al (2003) Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:125–138; discussion 139–140

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson DA, Skoll PJ (2002) Complete one-stage immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis material in patients with large or ptotic breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayram Y, Kulachi Y, Igril C et al (2010) Skin-reducing subcutaneous mastectomy using a dermal barrier flap and immediate breast reconstruction with an implant: a new surgical design for reconstruction of early-stage breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott HC, Sumer D (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: review of incidence, management and outcome. Ann Plast Surg 50:249–255; discussion 255

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH et al (2003) The use of skin-sparing mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer: the Emory experience. Surg Oncol 12:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies K, Allan L, Ross D et al (2010) Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 20:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beer GM, Varga Z, Budi S et al (2002) Incidence of superficial fascia and its relevance in skin-sparing mastectomy. Cancer 94:1619–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seltzer V (1994) The Breast: embryology, development and anatomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:879–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho CM, Mak CK, Lau Y et al (2003) Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barton FE Jr, English JM, Kingsley WB et al (1991) Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(3):389–392; discussion 393–394

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson GW, Grossl N, Leweis MM et al (1996) Preservation of the inframammary fold: what are we leaving behind? Plast Reconstr Surg 98:447–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AlgaithyZK Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V et al (2012) Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? EJSO 38:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C et al (2009) Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg 249:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS III, Disa JJ et al (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of the literature. Breast J 15:440–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusby JE, Smith BL, Gui GPH (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Br J Surg 97:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG et al (2010) Human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1606–1614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H et al (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:429–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ et al (2010) The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64:674–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu AS, Kao H, Reish RG et al (2010) Post-operative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Surg Adv. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233

  23. Nahabedian MY (2009) AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1743–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rawlini V, Buck DW, Heyer K et al (2010) Tissue expander breast reconstruction using prehydrated human acellular dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E et al (2008) Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:418–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoppe IC, Yueh JH, Wei CH et al (2011) Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. E-plasty.com 11: 417–428

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newman MI, Swartz KA, Samson MC et al (2011) The true incidence of near-term postoperative complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction utilizing human acellular dermal matrices: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adetayo OA, Salcedo SE, Bahjri K et al (2011) A meta-analysis of outcomes using acellular dermal matrix in breast and abdominal wall reconstructions: event rates and risk factors predictive of complications. Ann Plast Surg [E-pub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sbitany H, Serletti JM (2011) Acellular dermis–assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1162–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sbitany H, Langstein HN (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in primary breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Surg J 31:30S–37S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Payette JR, Kohlenberg E, Leonardi L et al (2005) Assessment of skin flaps using optically based methods for measuring blood flow and oxygenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jansen LA, Macadam SA (2011) The use of Alloderm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2232–2244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2011) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  34. Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS et al (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1111–1115; discussion, 1116–1118

    Google Scholar 

  35. Behranwala KA, Dua RS, Ross GM et al (2006) The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 59:1043–1051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS et al (2009) Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol 90:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL (2009).Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:395–408. Review

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kronowitz SJ (2010) Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction: technical and timing considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:463–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nava MB, Pennati AE, Lozza L et al (2011) Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lipa JE, Qiu W, Huang N et al (2010) Pathogenesis of radiation-induced capsular contracture in tissue expander and implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:437–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Losken A, Pinelli XA, Sikoro K et al (2011) Autologous fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 66:518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Serra-Renom JM, Munoz-Olmo JL, Serra-Mestre JM (2010) Fat grafting in postmastectomy breast reconstruction with expanders and prostheses in patients who have received radiotherapy: formation of new subcutaneous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:12–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2010) Bioprosthetic materials for plastic surgery of the breast. In: Spear SL et al (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1488–1494

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moyer HR, Losken A (2009) The science behind tissue biologics. Plastic Surgery News 3(4)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Sheflan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheflan, M., Brown, I. (2013). Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Variable Lower Pole Support. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2651-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2652-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics