Skip to main content

Superior Pedicle Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery
  • 2759 Accesses

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) for cancer is considered to be as safe as mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer. However, poor cosmetic outcomes of BCT are more frequent in hypertrophic and/or ptotic breasts than in small breasts. Techniques of breast reduction coupled with BCT, oncoplastic surgery, help to improve this aesthetic result. The superior pedicle breast reduction technique is useful for the treatment of tumor of the inferior quadrant of the breast from the 3 o’clock to the 9 o’clock position. Small tumors (T1, T2) are well treated by BCT, but indications are now extended to larger tumors when the breast size allows larger resection. Oncoplastic surgery with the superior pedicle breast reduction technique is suitable for large breasts (cup size D or greater). The type of the tumor (ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular invasive, multicentric, vascular invasion) and the age of the patient (below 40 years) can raise the positive margin and recurrence rates; therefore, specific evaluation is necessary in these cases. Oncoplastic surgery is generally discouraged in already irradiated breasts. The long-term oncologic results of BCT with oncoplastic surgery are comparable with the results of BCT randomized trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of randomised trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation of the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Eng J Med 347:1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Veronesi U, Casinelly N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Eng J Med 347:1227–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BrierlyJD, Paterson ICM, Lallemand RC et al (1991) The influence of breast size on the late radiation reaction following excision and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Clin Oncol 3:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C et al (1998) Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision. Recent Results Cancer Res 152:202–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M et al (2005) Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12(7):539–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zierhut D, Flentje M, Franck C et al (1994) Conservative treatment of breast cancer: modified irradiation technique for women with large breasts. Radiother Oncol 31:256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC et al (2007) Long-term oncological results of breast-conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast 16:387–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B et al (2003) Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast cancer. Ann Surg 237(1):26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakr RA, Poulet B, Kaufman GJ et al (2011) Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: a surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:350–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim K, Chie EK, Han W et al (2011) Age < 40 years is an independent prognostic factor predicting inferior overall survival in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. Breast J 17:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Montag E et al (2011) Outcome analysis of immediate and delayed conservative breast surgery reconstruction with mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty techniques. Ann Plast Surg 67:220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R et al (1995) Breast Tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L et al (2011) Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women with dense breast. Eur J Oncol 37:199–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petit JY, Botteri E, Lohsiriwat V et al (2011) Locoregional recurrence risk after lipofilling in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 23(3):582–588

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB et al (2011) The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicentric study-Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):341–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell MS et al (2009) The impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts JM, Clark CJ, Campbell MJ et al (2011) Incidence of abnormal mammograms after reduction mammoplasty: implications for Oncoplastic closure. Am J Surg 201(5):608–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muriel Greuse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greuse, M. (2013). Superior Pedicle Techniques. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2652-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2651-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2652-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics