Advertisement

La comunicazione in senologia

  • Francesco Schiavon
  • Emanuela Zambrin
  • Marco Piuzzi

Riassunto

La senologia è il tipico settore dell’imaging al quale gli aspetti caratterizzanti l’attuale comunicazione si adattano pressoché completamente. Riguarda, infatti, un limitato gruppo di donne sintomatiche, che sono quindi “pazienti” a tutti gli effetti, e un assai più numeroso gruppo di donne asintomatiche che, aderendo ai programmi di prevenzione mediante esami clinico-strumentali completi o mediante screening mammografico (Fig. 11.1), possono essere definite “utenti” [1].

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Barreau B, Tastet S (2005) De l’usage des pratiques de communication dans la relation radiologue-patiente en senologie. In: Taourel P, Tardivon A (eds) Imagerie du sein. Société française de radiologie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veronesi U, Boyle P, Rilke F (1988) Carcinoma della mammella. Sorbona Edizioni, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martino G (2006) Informazione-Comunicazione negli studi di prevenzione e diagnosi precoce. In: Modena S (a cura di) Trattato di Senologia. Piccin, Padova, pp. 111–116Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barreau B, Tastet S (2007) L’annonce du diagnostic en sénologie: les techniques de communication. J Radiol 88(2):219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lorch H, Scherer P (2007) Disclosure of diagnosis in ambulatory radiology practice: expectations of patients and referring physicians. Rofo 179(10):1043–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mammography quality standards act. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Radiation-EmittingProducts/ MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/Regulations/ucm110849.pdf)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giordano L, Webster P, Segnan N, Austoker J (2005) Linee guida europee sulla comunicazione ed informazione nei programmi di screening mammografico. GISMa, Grassina (Firenze)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD (2002) Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract 15(1):25–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown RF, Butow PN, Henman M et al (2002) Responding to the active and passive patient: flexibility is the key. Health Expect 5(3):236–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassett LW, Bomyea K, Liu S, Sayre J (1995) Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers. Radiology 195(1): 235–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leclère J, Ollivier L, Dolbeault S, Neuenschwander S (2006) Dialogue entre le radiologue et le patient atteint d’un cancer. J Radiol 87(2 Pt 1):99–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leclère J, Ollivier L, Pacault V, Palangié T (1996) La relation médecin-malade en écographie cancérologique. J Radiol 77(6):405–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berlin L (2002) Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist’s duty? AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(4):809–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berlin L (2007) Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: has the time come? AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(6):1275–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hammond I, Franche RL, Black DM, Gaudette S (1999) The radiologist and the patient: breaking bad news. Can Assoc Radiol J 50(4):233–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey JA, Cohen MA, Brenin DR et al (2007) Breaking bad news: a primer for radiologists in breast imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 4(11):800–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ragavendra N, Laifer-Narin SL, Melany ML, Grant EG (1998) Disclosure of results of sonographic examinations to patients by sonologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1423–1425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall FM (2009) The radiology report of the future. Radiology 251(2):313–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The face of radiology. American College of Radiology (http://www.mypatientconnection.com/ Articles/Neimanletter.aspx)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martino G (2004) Problemi relazionali nel lavoro del TSRM in Senologia. In: Mammografia: tecnica e controlli di qualità. Testo per Tecnici Sanitari di Radiologia Medica. Scuola Italiana di Senologia, Milano (http://www.senologia.it/scuola/tecnica_mammografica_2004.html)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gunderman RB (2005) The golden rule. J Am Coll Radiol 2(1):76–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Schiavon
    • 1
  • Emanuela Zambrin
    • 2
  • Marco Piuzzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Diagnostica per ImmaginiULSS7 VenetoConeglianoItalia
  2. 2.Dipartimento di RadiologiaOspedale di BellunoBellunoItalia

Personalised recommendations