Skip to main content

Exactitude and Extravagance: Andrea Pozzo’s “Viewpoint”

  • Chapter
Imagine Math
  • 3083 Accesses

Abstract

Andrea Pozzo’sperspective inventions represent the art of quadratura on itshighest level.The illusory power of his fictive architecture was so strong that it forcefully conditioned the perception of space, leading neo-classical critics to censor his paintings as if they were actually buildings. Eloquent on this subject is the criticism of Francesco Milizia, who warned young architects not to follow the example of Brother Pozzo,calling him an “architect in reverse”1. On the technical level,instead, the supreme skill of the Jesuit painter was undeniable. He could in fact be criticized for one thing only, his decision to impose a compulsory viewpoint on the observer. But it was just this point that formed the cornerstone of his art, and Pozzo, heedless of the critics,never abandoned that crucial requisite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [24], Book III, p. 276.

  2. 2.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), p. 12, Avvisi a iprincipianti. Pozzo (1725), Advise to Beginners.

  3. 3.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part II (1700), pp. 19–20.

  4. 4.

    On the history of quadraturism, see [25], xi, pp. 99–116; [33], [21], [17].

  5. 5.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), p. 13, Al lettore studioso di Prospettiva; Pozzo (1725), To the Lovers of Perspective.

  6. 6.

    See [1], [11], [16]. On this subject see also [3].

  7. 7.

    On this subject see [4], pp. 51–75.

  8. 8.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I, ed. 1717, Fig. 101, pp. 216–217.

  9. 9.

    See [9].

  10. 10.

    See [26]; see also [18]; [8], pp. 293–295.

  11. 11.

    Baldinucci (1975), p. 316.

  12. 12.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), p. 12, Avvisi a i principianti. Pozzo (1725), Advise to Beginners.

  13. 13.

    [32], p. 25v: “II perspetivo non fara cosa alcuna senza l’Architetura, ne l’Architetto senza perspettiva” [Perspectivist can do nothing without architecture, nor can the architect without perspective].

  14. 14.

    [13], Part I (1642), Preface: “Cette science se peut vanter d’estre l’ame et la vie de la Peinture [...] le plus belle pieces de Perspective, se font de Bastimens riches et somptueux, construits selon les ordres des Colomnes, la beauté desquels dépend des proportions et des mesures qui doivent estre observées, autrement elles blesseront l’oeil” [This science can boast of being the life and soul of Painting [...] the most beautiful perspectives are made with rich, sumptuous buildings, constructed according to the orders of columns, whose beauty depends on the proportions and dimensions that must be respected to avoid wound the eye].

  15. 15.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), Fig. 91, pp. 196–197: “Si meravigliarono alcuni architetti, che io appoggiassi le colonne davanti sopra mensole, ciò che essi non farebbono in una fabrica vera, e reale”. Pozzo (1725), The Ninety-first Figure: “Some Architects dislik’d my setting the advanc’d Columns upon Corbels, as being a thing not practis’d in solid Structures”.

  16. 16.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), Fig. 1, p. 16. Pozzo (1725), The First Figure.

  17. 17.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), p. 13, Al lettore studioso di Prospettiva. Pozzo (1725), To the Lovers of Perspective.

  18. 18.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), Fig. 62, p. 138: Del graticolare i telari che rappresentano fabriche di rilievo. Pozzo (1725), The Sixty-second Figure, Of making the Net-work on Frames, for representing the Architecture as solid.

  19. 19.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), Fig. 100, p. 216: Modo di far la graticola nelle volte. Pozzo (1725), The Hundredth Figure, The Method of drawing the Net or Lattice Work on Vaults.

  20. 20.

    Ibidem.

  21. 21.

    Ibidem.

  22. 22.

    See [30]; [5], Apiarium V, Progymnasma II, pp. 35–56; [22], Book II, Part II; Book X, Part II; [31], Book III; [14].

  23. 23.

    On this subject, see [29]; [4], pp. 87–94.

  24. 24.

    See [12].

  25. 25.

    See [6], [10], [23], [20].

  26. 26.

    [7], pl. 15.

  27. 27.

    See [19].

  28. 28.

    [13], Part I (1642), Preface.

  29. 29.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), Al lettore studioso di Prospettiva. Pozzo (1725), To the Lovers of Perspective.

  30. 30.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part II (1700), Al lettore. Pozzo (1725), To the Lovers of Perspective.

  31. 31.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part I (1693), p. 12, Avvisi a i principianti. Pozzo (1725), Advice to Beginners.

  32. 32.

    Pozzo (1693–1700), Part II (1700), Al lettore.

References

  1. D.C Lindberg, Roger Bacon’s philosophy of nature. A critical edition, with English translation, introduction and notes, of De multiplicatione specierum and De speculis comburentibus. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.S. Baldinucci, Vite di artisti dei secoli XVII-XVIII: prima edizione integrale del Codice Palatino 565, (ed.) Matteoli A. Roma, 1975, pp. 314–337.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Baltrŭsaitis, Lospecchio. Rivelazioni, inganni e science fiction. Adelphi, Milano, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Baltrŭusaitis, Anamorfosi, o, Thaumaturgus opticus. Adelphi, Milano, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Bettini, Apiaria universae philosophiae mathematicae. I.B. Ferroni, Bologna, 1645.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bosse, Manière universelledeG.Desarguespourpratiquerlaperspective. PierreDes-Hayes, Paris, 1643.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bosse, Moyen universel de pratiquer la perspective sur les tableaux ou surfaces irrégulières. Paris, 1653.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Camerota, La prospettiva del Rinascimento. Arte architettura scienza. Electa, Milano, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Caramuel de Lobkowitz, Architectura civil recta y obliqua, considerada y dibuxada en el Templo de Jerusalem. Camillo Corrado, Vigevano, 1678.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Curabelle, Examen des oeuvres du Sieur Désargues. M.&I. Henault, Paris, 1644.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.B. Della Porta, Magiae Naturalis libri XX. Matthiam Cancer, Napoli, 1589.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Desargues, Exemple d’une manière universelle de S.G.D.L. touchant la pratique de la perspective. Bidault, Paris, 1636.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Dubreuil, La perspective pratique necessaire a tous peintres, graveurs, sculpteurs, architectes, orfeures, brodeurs, tapissiers, & autres se servans du dessein. Melchior Tavernier, Paris, 1642-1647-1649.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Dubreuil, Advis charitables sur les diverses oeuvres, et feuilles volantes du sr. Girard Desargues Lyonois. Melchior Tavernier, Paris, 1642.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Dubreuil, Diverses methodes universelles et nouvelles en tout ou en partie pour faire des perspectives. Melchior Tavernier, Paris, 1642.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hero of Alexandria, Mechanica et catoptrica. In: Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Filippi, L’arte della prospettiva. L’opera e l’insegnamento di Andrea Pozzo e Ferdinando Galli Bibiena in Piemonte. Olschki, Firenze, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Heimbürger Ravalli, Architettura, scultura e arti minori nel Barocco italiano. Ricerche nell’Archivio Spada. Palombi, Firenze, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Huret, Exposé d’unrégle precise por decrier le profil élevé du fut des colonnes. Paris, 1665.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Huret, Optique de Portraiture et Peinture. Huret, Paris, 1670.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Kemp, The science of art. Optical themes in Western art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Kircher, Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae. Grignani, Roma, 1646.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. LeBicheur, Traicté de Perspective. Jollain, Paris, 1660.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Milizia, Memorie degli architetti antichi e moderni. Stamperia Reale, Parma, 1781.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Negri Arnoldi, Prospettici e quadraturisti. In: Enciclopedia Universale dell’Arte, vol. XI, pp. 99–116. De Agostini, Novara, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Neppi, Palazzo Spada. Edizioni d’Italia, Roma, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Pozzo, Perspectiva pictorum atque architectorum. Komarek, Roma, 1693-1700.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Pozzo, Rules and examples of perspective proper for painters and architects. London, 1725.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N.G. Poudra, Oeuvres de Desargues reunies et analiste. Leiber, Paris, 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Scheiner, Pantographice, seu ars delineandi res quaslibet per parallelogrammum lineare seu cavum, mechanicum, mobile. Grignani, Roma, 1631.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Schott, Magia universalis naturae et artis, sive, Recondita naturalium & artificialium rerum scientia. Schönwetter, Würzburg, 1657.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Serlio, Il Primo libro d’Architettura [diGeometria]. Il Secondo Libro di Perspettiva. Barbé, Paris, 1545.

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. Spinosa, Spazio infinito e decorazione barocca. In: Storia dell’arte italiana, 6, Einaudi, Torino, 1981, pp. 275–343.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Camerota, F. (2012). Exactitude and Extravagance: Andrea Pozzo’s “Viewpoint”. In: Emmer, M. (eds) Imagine Math. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2427-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics