Skip to main content

Part of the book series: UNITEXT ((UNITEXTMAT))

  • 3368 Accesses

Abstract

We have seen in Chapter 3 that Galerkin method applied to elliptic problems in the form: find uVH 1 (Ω) such that

$$ a\left( {u,v} \right) = F\left( v \right) \forall v \in V, $$

provides a convergent solution in the H 1(Ω) norm that satisfies

$$ {\left\| {{u_h}} \right\|_V} \leqslant \frac{M}{\alpha }, {\left\| {u - {u_h}} \right\|_{{H^1}(\Omega )}} \leqslant \frac{\gamma }{\alpha }\mathop {\inf }\limits_{{v_h} \in {V_h}} {\left\| {u - {u_h}} \right\|_{{H^1}(\Omega ),}} $$

where M is the continuity constant of F(·), α and γ coercivity and continuity constants of a(·,·) respectively. In practice, these inequalities can be meaningless when the constants involved are large. In particular if γ ≫ α the second inequality is an effective bound for the error only if \(\mathop {\inf }\limits_{{v_h} \in {V_h}} {\left\| {u - {v_h}} \right\|_{{H^1}(\Omega )}}\) is small. For a finite element discretization, this corresponds to a small value of the mesh size h. The associated discretized problem can be therefore computationally expensive or even not affordable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These are not the most general assumptions for ensuring continuity. For instance, since Sobolev Theorem states that in 1D H 1(a, b) functions are bounded, we could assume β(x) ∈ L 2(a, b). Here we refer here to somehow more restrictive assumptions, yet reasonable for the applications.

  2. 2.

    This is however “pessimistic”, normally in multidimensional problems the element-wise definition is used and one may adopt grid adaptivity to satisfy the condition.

  3. 3.

    In general it is not trivial to prove regularity of the solution to problems with different boundary conditions on different portions of the boundary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Formaggia, L., Saleri, F., Veneziani, A. (2012). Advection-diffusion-reaction (ADR) problems. In: Solving Numerical PDEs: Problems, Applications, Exercises. UNITEXT(). Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2412-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics