Advertisement

MDCT Protocols pp 156-189 | Cite as

Heart

  • Andrea Laghi

Keywords

Coronary Artery Emergency Medicine Calcium Antagonist Injection Time Beta Blocker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andreini D, Pontone G, Pepi M et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2044–2050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler J (2007) The emerging role of multi-detector computed tomography in heart failure. J Card Fail 13:215–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Williams TJ, Manghat NE, McKay-Ferguson A et al (2008) Cardiomyopathy: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row computed tomography. Clin Radiol 63:464–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Ghersin E, Lessick J, Litmanovich D et al (2006) Comprehensive multidetector CT assessment of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Br J Radiol 79:e200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mitsutake R, Miura S, Sako H et al (2008) Usefulness of multi-detector row computed tomography for the management of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 129:e61–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Sparrow P, Merchant N, Provost Y et al (2009) Cardiac MRI and CT features of inheritable and congenital conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. Eur Radiol 19:259–270. PMID: 18795295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Eilen D, Peterson N, Karkut C et al (2008) Isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium: a case report and literature review. Echocardiography 25:755–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jacquier A, Revel D, Saeed M (2008) MDCT of the myocardium: a new contribution to ischemic heart disease. Acad Radiol 15:477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Orakzai SH, Orakzai RH, Nasir K et al (2006) Assessment of cardiac function using multidetector row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:555–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Grebenc ML, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Green CE et al (2002) Cardiac myxoma: imaging features in 83 patients. RadioGraphics 22:673–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Neragi-Miandoab S, Kim J, Vlahakes GJ (2007) Malignant tumours of the heart: a review of tumour type, diagnosis and therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 19:748–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yuan SM, Shinfeld A, Lavee J et al (2009) Imaging morphology of cardiac tumours. Cardiol J 16:26–35PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Ferencik M, Gregory SA, Butler J et al (2007) Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Lung Transplant 26:478–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gregory SA, Ferencik M, Achenbach S et al (2006) Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathy. Am J Cardiol 98:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Iyengar S, Feldman DS, Cooke GE et al (2006) Detection of coronary artery disease in orthotopic heart transplant recipients with 64-detector row computed tomography angiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 25:1363–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Eichhorn JG, Long FR, Hill SL et al (2006) Assessment of in-stent stenosis in small children with congenital heart disease using multi-detector computed tomography: a validation study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68:11–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC et al (2006) Using multidetector-row CT in neonates with complex congenital heart disease to replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization for anatomical investigation: initial experiences in technical and clinical feasibility. Pediatr Radiol 36:1273–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Leschka S, Oechslin E, Husmann L et al (2007) Pre-and postoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease in children and adults with 64-section CT. Radio-Graphics 27:829–846Google Scholar

References

  1. Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Balgude A et al (2006) MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:350–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ryan R, Abbara S, Colen RR et al (2008) Cardiac valve disease: spectrum of findings on cardiac 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Cheng CC, Tsao TP, Tzeng BH et al (2008) Stenting for coronary intervention-related dissection of the left main coronary artery with extension to the aortic root: a case report. South Med J 101:1165–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kantarci M, Ceviz N, Sevimli S et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for detecting aorto-ostial lesions compared with catheter coronary angiography: multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography is superior to catheter angiography in detection of aorto-ostial lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:595–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoshikai M, Ikeda K, Itoh M et al (2008) Detection of coronary artery disease in acute aortic dissection: the efficacy of 64-row multidetector computed tomo graphy. J Card Surg 23:277–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Luccichenti G et al (2006) Coronary artery anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and role of diagnostic imaging. Radiol Med 111:376–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dodd JD, Ferencik M, Liberthson RR et al (2007) Congenital anomalies of coronary artery origin in adults: 64-MDCT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:W138–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kacmaz F, Ozbulbul NI, Alyan O et al (2008) Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis 19:203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Cademartiri F, Romano M, Seitun S et al (2008) Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery disease in a population with suspected ischemic heart disease using CT coronary angiography: correlations with cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation. Radiol Med 113:363–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:636–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Hecht HS (2008) Applications of multislice coronary computed tomographic angiography to percutaneous coronary intervention: how did we ever do without it? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:490–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Otsuka M, Sugahara S, Umeda K et al (2008) Utility of multislice computed tomography as a strategic tool for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:201–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yokoyama N, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki S et al (2006) Impact of 16-slice computed tomography in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N et al (2008) Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess 12(17):iii–iv, ix-143Google Scholar
  2. Narula J, Garg P, Achenbach S et al (2008) Arithmetic of vulnerable plaques for noninvasive imaging. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med (5 Suppl) vn2:S2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Schmid M, Pflederer T, Jang IK et al (2008) Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque incoronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 197:457–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Foster G, Shah H, Sarraf G et al (2009) Detection of noncalcified and mixed plaque by multirow detector computed tomography. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 7:57–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2008) Assessment of changes in non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque volume in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries over time by 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 101:579–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE et al (2007) Multi-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. Acute Card Care 9:214–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mitsutake R, Miura S, Nishikawa H et al (2008) Usefulness of the evaluation of stent fracture by 64-multi-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiol 51:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C et al (2006) Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. Radiographics 26:887–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Abbasi M, Soltani G, Somali A, Javan H (2009) A large saphenous vein graft aneurysm one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery presenting as a left lung mass. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 8:691–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Trop I, Samson L, Cordeau MP (1999) Anterior mediastinal mass in a patient with prior saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 115:572–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Williams ML, Rampresaud E, Wolfe WG (2004) A man with saphenous vein graft aneu-rysm after bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1815–1817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Jones CM, Chin KY, Yang GZ et al (2008) Coronary artery bypass graft imaging with 64-slice multislice computed tomography: literature review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29:204–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Marano R, Liguori C, Rinaldi P et al (2007) Coronary artery bypass grafts and MDCT imaging: what to know and what to look for. Eur Radiol 17:3166–3178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Nabuchi A, Kurata A, Okuyama H et al (2008) Three-dimensional images of extraroutine grafts in CABG by multi detector computed tomography. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 14:333–335PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Crusco F, Antoniella A, Papa V et al (2007) Evidence based medicine: role of multidetector CT in the follow-up of patients receiving coronary artery bypass graft. Radiol Med 112:509–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L et al (2007) Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 99:1529–1534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mueller J, Jeudy J, Poston R et al (2007) Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:414–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Laghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology“Sapienza” University of RomeLatinaItaly

Personalised recommendations