Advertisement

Abdomen

  • Andrea Laghi

Keywords

Permeability Surface Patient Preparation Injection Flow Rate Urinary Tract Stone Good Patient Compliance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Kebapci M, Kaya T, Gurbuz E et al (2003) Differentiation of adrenal adenomas (lipid rich and lipid poor) from nonadenomas by use of washout characteristics on delayed enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 28:709–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mayo-Smith WW, Boland GW, Noto RB et al (2001) Sate of the art of adrenal imaging. RadioloGraphics 4:995–1012Google Scholar
  3. Park BK, Kim B, Ko K et al (2006) Adrenal masses falsely diagnosed as adenomas on unenhanced and delayedcontrast-enhanced computed tomography: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 16:642–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Vullierme MP et al (2006) CT and MR imaging evaluation of hepatic adenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(5):745–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lim AK, Patel N, Gedroyc WM et al (2002) Hepatocellular adenoma: diagnostic difficulties and novel imaging techniques. Br J Radiol 75(896):695–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Nalesnik M (2000) Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology 214(3):861–868PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Katyal S, Kapoor V (2002) Hemodynamic characterization of focal nodular hyperplasia using three-dimensional volume-rendered multidetector CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:81–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lin MC, Tsay PK, Ko SF et al (2008) Triphasic dynamic CT findings of 63 hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia in 46 patients: correlation with size and pathological findings. Abdom Imaging 33:301–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu AM, Cheng HY, Chen D et al (2002) Plane and weighted tri-phase helical CT findings in the diagnosis of liver focal nodular hyperplasia. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 1:219–223PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al (2005) Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 234:460–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Rossi P et al (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with triple-phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with chronic hepatitis. Radiology 226:543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N et al (2005) Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:63–69PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Petralia G, Fazio N, Bonello L et al (2011) Perfusion computed tomography in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with thalidomide: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(2):195–201. PubMed PMID: 21412089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ng CS, Chandler AG, Wei W et al (2011) Reproducibility of CT Perfusion parameters in liver tumors and normal liver. Radiology Jul 25. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21788525Google Scholar
  3. Spira D, Schulze M, Sauter A et al (2011) Volume perfusion-CT of the liver: Insights and applications. Eur J Radiol May 2. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21543180Google Scholar

References

  1. Choi YH, Lee JM, Lee JY et al (2008) Biliary malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(3):362–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim NR, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2008) Enhancement characteristics of cholangiocarcinomas on mutiphasic helical CT: emphasis on morphologic subtypes. Clin Imaging 32(2):114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Uchida M, Ishibashi M, Tomita N et al (2005) Hilar and suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of 3D angiography and multiphase fusion images using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(5):1572–1577PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Dawson P, Blomley M (2002) The value of mathematical modelling in understanding contrast enhancement in CT with particular reference to the detection of hypovascular liver metastases. Eur J Radiol 41:222–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Silverman PM (2006) Liver metastases: imaging considerations for protocol development with multislice CT (MSCT). Cancer Imaging 6:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M et al (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 231:413–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Ascenti G, Visalli C, Genitori A et al (2004) Multiple hypervascular pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma: dynamic MR and spiral CT in three cases. Clin Imaging 28:349–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Meyer BC, Frericks BB, Voges M et al (2008) Visualization of hypervascular liver lesions during TACE: comparison of angiographic C-arm CT and MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Namasivayam S, Salman K, Mittal PK et al (2007) Hypervascular hepatic focal lesions: spectrum of imaging features. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:107–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Itatsu K, Fujii T, Sasaki M et al (2007) Intraductal papillary cholangiocarcinoma and atypical biliary epithelial lesions confused with intrabiliary extension of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 54:677–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ji Y, Fan J, Zhou J et al (2008) Intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile duct. A distinct entity like its counterpart in pancreas. Histol Histopathol 23:41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim NR, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2008) Enhancement characteristics of cholangiocarcinomas on mutiphasic helical CT: emphasis on morphologic subtypes. Clin Imaging 32:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, Kruskal JB (2007) Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. RadioGraphics 27:1653–1666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhari VV, Raman SS, Vuong NL et al (2007) Pancreatic cystic lesions: discrimination accuracy based on clinical data and high resolution CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:860–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gomez D, Rahman SH, Won LF et al (2006) Characterization of malignant pancreatic cystic lesions in the background of chronic pancreatitis. JOP 7:465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Edirimanne S, Connor SJ (2008) Incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. World J Surg 32(9):2028–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garcea G, Ong SL, Rajesh A et al (2008) Cystic lesions of the pancreas. A diagnostic and management dilemma. Pancreatology 8(3):236–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Sahani D, Prasad S, Saini S et al (2002) Cystic pancreatic neoplasms evaluation by CT and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12(4):657–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Horton KM et al (2006) MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(3):687–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Takada A, Itoh S, Suzuki K et al (2005) Branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous tumor: diagnostic value of multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 15(9):1888–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Takeshita K, Kutomi K, Takada K et al (2008) Differential diagnosis of benign or malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas by multidetector row helical computed tomography: evaluation of predictive factors by logistic regression analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(2):191–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Anderson SW (2006) Sixty-four multi-detector row computed tomography in multitrauma patient imaging: early experience. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 35:188–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SW, Varghese JC, Lucey BC et al (2007) Blunt splenic trauma: delayedphase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients. Radiology 243:88–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Boyd-Kranis R et al (2000) Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy. Radiology 217:75–82PubMedGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC et al (2007) Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT-correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 242(2):472–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK (2005) Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 30(4):465–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee SM, Kim SH, Lee JM et al (2008) Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Abdom Imaging PMID: 18546037Google Scholar

References

  1. Hara AK, Alam S, Heigh RI et al (2008) Using CT enterography to monitor Crohn’s disease activity: a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1512–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hara AK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI et al (2006) Crohn disease of the small bowel: preliminary comparison among CT enterography, capsule endoscopy, small-bowel follow-through, and ileoscopy. Radiology 238:128–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA et al (2006) Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography-correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 238:505–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Da Ronch T, Modesto A, Bazzocchi M et al (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumour: spiral computed tomography features and pathologic correlation. Radiol Med 111:661–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Leo C, Memeo M, Spinelli F, Angeletti G (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: experience with multislice CT. Radiol Med 111:1103–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rimondini A, Belgrano M, Favretto G et al (2007) Contribution of CT to treatment planning in patients with GIST. Radiol Med 112:691–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Halligan S, Saunders B (2002) Imaging diverticular disease. Best Practice Res Clinical Gastroenterol 16(4):595–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lawrimore T, Rhea JT (2004) Computed tomography evaluation of diverticulitis. J Intensive Care Med 19(4):194–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hoff G, Kay CL (2007) Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening. Endoscopy 39:545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mang T, Graser A, Schima W, Maier A (2007) CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings. Eur J Radiol 61:388–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P et al (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Hoff G, Kay CL (2007) Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening. Endoscopy 39:545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mang T, Graser A, Schima W, Maier A (2007) CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings. Eur J Radiol 61:388–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P et al (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Hammerstingl RM, Vogl TJ (2005) Abdominal MDCT: protocols and contrast considerations. Eur Radiol (15 Suppl) 5:E78–E90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MH et al (2008) Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Eur Radiol 18:1406–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoon W, Jeong YY, Kim JK (2006) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: contrast-enhanced MDCT. Abdom Imaging 31:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kanamoto T, Matsuki M, Okuda J et al (2007) Preoperative evaluation of local invasion and metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer and mesenteric vascular variations using multidetector-row computed tomography before laparoscopic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:831–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A, Richards CJ (2006) Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61:924–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Vliegen R, Dresen R, Beets G et al (2008) The accuracy of multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 33(5):604–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Bellomi M, Petralia G, Sonzogni A et al (2007) CT perfusion for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal carcinoma: initial experience. Radiology 244:486–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goh V, Padhani AR, Rasheed S (2007) Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis. Lancet Oncol 8:245–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hamberg LM et al (2005) Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. Radiology 234:785–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Montz FJ et al (2003) Multidetector CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Radiographics 23(3):687-701Google Scholar

References

  1. Bae KT, Fuangtharnthip P, Prasad SR et al (2003) Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method. Radiology 228:735–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Yutzy GG et al (1996) Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:531–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Saito H et al (2003) Adrenal adenomas: relationship between histologic lipid-rich cells and CT attenuation number. Eur J Radiol 48:198–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kebapci M, Kaya T, Gurbuz E et al (2003) Differentiation of adrenal adenomas (lipid rich and lipid poor) from nonadenomas by use of washout characteristics on delayed enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 28:709–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mayo-Smith WW, Boland GW, Noto RB et al (2001) Sate of the art of adrenal imaging. RadioloGraphics 4:995–1012Google Scholar
  3. Park BK, Kim B, Ko K et al (2006) Adrenal masses falsely diagnosed as adenomas on unenhanced and delayedcontrast-enhanced computed tomography: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 16:642–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Sheir KZ, El-Azab M, Mosbah A et al (2005) Differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes by multislice computerized tomography. J Urol 174:451–455; discussion 455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang J, Lefkowitz RA, Ishill NM et al (2007) Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT. Radiology 244:494–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang J, Lefkowitz RA, Wang L et al (2007) Significance of peritumoral vascularity on CT in evaluation of renal cortical. tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:717–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Memarsadeghi M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M et al (2007) Unenhanced MDCT in patients with suspected urinary stone disease: do coronal reformations improve diagnostic performance? AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W60–W64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Paulson EK, Weaver C, Ho LM et al (2008) Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Kalra MK, Maher MM, D’Souza RV et al (2005) Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology 235:523–529. Epub 2005 Mar 15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW et al (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46:756–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Memarsadeghi M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M et al (2007) Unenhanced MDCT in patients with suspected urinary stone disease: do coronal reformations improve diagnostic performance? AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W60–W64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Paulson EK, Weaver C, Ho LM et al (2008) Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Bellomi M, Viotti S, Preda L et al (2010) Perfusion CT in solid body-tumours part II. Clinical applications and future development. Radiol Med 115:858–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Petralia G, Preda L, D’Andreas G et al (2010) In: Bellomi M (ed) La Radiologia Medica. CT perfusion in solid-body tumours. Part I: technical issues. Radiol Med, pp 843–857Google Scholar
  3. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hamberg LM et al (2005) Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. Radiology 234:785–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Laghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology“Sapienza” University of RomeLatinaItaly

Personalised recommendations