Advertisement

Essential References

  • Andrea Laghi
  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR (2006) Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. J Am Coll Radiol 3:751–771

  • Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H et al (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor to liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224:757–763

  • Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF et al (2008) Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:777–784

  • Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective...

Keywords

Compute Tomography Coronary Angiography Invasive Coronary Angiography Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome Automatic Tube Current Modulation Computerize Tomography Enterography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR (2006) Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. J Am Coll Radiol 3:751–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H et al (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor to liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224:757–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF et al (2008) Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:777–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–3172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busacker A, Newell JD Jr, Keefe T et al (2009) A multivariate analysis of risk factors for the air-trapping asthmatic phenotype as measured by quantitative CT analysis. Chest 135:48–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodd JD, de Jong PA, Levy RD et al (2008) Conventional high-resolution CT versus contiguous multidetector CT in the detection of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients. J Thorac Imaging 23:235–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Endo I, Shimada H, Sugita M et al (2007) Role of three-dimensional imaging in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 142:666–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Sou H et al (2008) Effect of duration of contrast material injection on peak enhancement times and values of the aorta, main portal vein, and liver at dynamic MDCT with the dose of contrast medium tailored to patient weight. Clin Radiol 63:263–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleischmann D (2002) Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol 12(Suppl 2):S11–S15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleischmann D (2003) High-concentration contrast media in MDCT angiography: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13 Suppl 3:N39–N43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13:M14–M20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleischmann D (2005) How to design injection protocols for multiple detector-row CT an-giography (MDCTA). Eur Radiol 15 Suppl 5: E60–E65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleischmann D (2010) CT angiography: injection and acquisition technique. Radiol Clin North Am 48:237–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleischmann D, Kamaya A (2009) Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 47:13–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD (2005) Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. Radiology 236:1076–1082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher JG, Huprich J, Loftus EV Jr et al (2008) Computerized tomography enterography and its role in small-bowel imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flohr TG, Stierstorfer K, Ulzheimer S et al (2005) Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with zflying focal spot. Med Phys 32:2536–2547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Funama Y, Awai K, Hatemura M et al (2008) Automatic tube current modulation technique for multidetector CT: is it effective with a 64-detector CT? Radiol Phys Technol 1:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Funama Y, Awai K, Taguchi K et al (2009) Cone-beam technique for 64-MDCT of lung: image quality comparison with stepwise (stepand-shoot) technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomez D, Rahman SH, Won LF et al (2006) Characterization of malignant pancreatic cystic lesions in the background of chronic pancreatitis. JOP 7:465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grierson C, Uthappa MC, Uberoi R, Warakaulle D (2007) Multidetector CT appearances of splanchnic arterial pathology. Clin Radiol 62:717–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groen JM, Greuter MJ, Schmidt B et al (2007). The influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on calcium scores using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: a systematic phantom study. Invest Radiol 42:848–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang JS, Pan HB, Chou CP et al (2008) Optimizing scanning phases in detecting small (2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: whole-liver dynamic study with multidetector row CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:341–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Araki T (2006) Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients’ body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material. Eur J Radiol 58:165–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jankowski A, Martinelli T, Timsit JF et al (2007) Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection. Eur Radiol 17:3148–3156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2006) IV contrast selection for MDCT: current thoughts and practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:406–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kakihara D, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H et al (2007) Usefulness of the long-axis and short-axis reformatted images of multidetector-row CT in evaluating T-factor of the surgically resected pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Eur J Radiol 63:96–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK (2005) Liver and biliary system: evaluation by multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am 43:977–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanamoto T, Matsuki M, Okuda J et al (2007) Preoperative evaluation of local invasion and metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer and mesenteric vascular variations using multidetector-row computed tomography before laparoscopic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:831–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawel N, Seifert B, Luetolf M, Boehm T (2009) Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thinslab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1324–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klauss M, Mohr A, von Tengg-Kobligk H et al (2008) A new invasion score for determining the resectability of pancreatic carcinomas with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography. Pancreatology 8:204–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kobayashi T, Ikeda Y, Murakami M et al (2008) Computed tomographic angiography to evaluate the right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 14:166–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Laghi A (2007) Multidetector CT (64 Slices) of the liver: examination techniques. Eur Radiol 17:675–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Passariello R (2001) Multislice spiral computed tomography angiography of mesenteric arteries. Lancet 358:638–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laghi A, Passariello R (2008) La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, MilanGoogle Scholar
  39. Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction and coronary as-sessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1450–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR et al (2007). 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–7514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Poloni G, Bonomo L (2007) CT enteroclysis: multidetector technique (MDCT) versus single-detector technique (SDCT) in patients with suspected small-bowel Crohn’s disease. Radiol Med 112:1188–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N et al (2008). Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess 12:iii–iv, ix-143Google Scholar
  44. Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M et al (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. NIMISCAD Study Group (2008) Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16-and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography. Eur Radiol PMID:19089430Google Scholar
  46. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, Lee VS (2005) Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology 234:661–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A et al (2008) Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy. AJR 190:136–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Platten D, Keat N, Lewis M, Edyvean S (2005) Report 05068. 32 to 64 slice CT scanner comparison report version 13. ImPACT, Purchasing and Supply Agency 1–23Google Scholar
  49. Prokop M (2003) Multislice CT: technical principles and future trends. Eur Radiol 13:M3–M13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reid JH et the International Atomic Energy Agency Consultants’ Group (2009) Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:505–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rogalla P, Kloeters C, Hein PA (2009) CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 47:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Romano S, Romano L, Grassi R (2007) Multidetector row computed tomography findings from ischemia to infarction of the large bowel. Eur J Radiol 61:433–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM et al (2007) Investigators of the IMPACT Study. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 42:856–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Satoi S, Yamamoto H, Takai S et al (2007) Clinical impact of multidetector row computed tomography on patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 34:175–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al (2008) Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:531–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW (2008) Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin 58:161–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strocchi S, Vite C, Callegari L et al (2006) Optimisation of multislice computed tomography protocols in angio-CT examinations. Radiol Med 11:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P et al (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wahidi MM, Govert JA, Goudar RK et al (2007) Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132:94S–107SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang XP, Chen WX, Wu DS, Wang XD (2011) Whole-liver perfusion scans with 64-slice spiral CT in patients with liver cirrhosis. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 42:382–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Xia D, Bian J, Han X et al (1997) An Investigation of Compressivesensing Image Reconstruction from Flying-focal-spot CT Data. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2009:3458–3462Google Scholar
  62. Yoneda K, Ueno J, Nishihara S et al (2007) Postprocessing technique with MDCT data improves the accuracy of the detection of lung nodules. Radiat Med 25:511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y et al (2007) Optimal dose and injection duration (injection rate) of contrast material for depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas by multidetector CT. Radiat Med 25:278–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zech CJ, Bruns C, Reiser MF, Herrmann KA (2008) [Tumor-like lesion of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis: imaging characteristics of computed tomography]. Radiologe 48:777–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Laghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology“Sapienza” University of RomeLatinaItaly

Personalised recommendations