Endoscopic Ultrasonography of the Pancreas

  • Elisabetta Buscarini
  • Stefania De Lisi


Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) joins a high frequency (5–20 MHz) US transducer to a flexible endoscope. In contrast to transabdominal US, EUS provides a high-resolution view of the pancreatic parenchyma because of the close proximity of the probe to the gland without interference from bowel gas or fat tissue, and it is one of the most accurate methods for diagnosing and staging pancreatic diseases. Indeed, EUS is the most sensitive technique for the detection of lesions to screen subjects who are at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer, showing a sensitivity of 93% compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (81%) and computed tomography (CT) (27%) [1].


Pancreatic Cancer Chronic Pancreatitis Main Pancreatic Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumor Minor Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Canto MI, Schulick RD, Kamel IR et al (2010) Screening for familial pancreatic neoplasia: a prospective, multicenter blinded study of EUS, CT, and secretin-MRCP (The NCISpore Lustgarten Foundation Cancer of the Pancreas CAPS 3 Study). Gastrointest Endosc 71:AB119Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS et al (2009) EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc 70:1093–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Lopes TL et al (2009) Cervical esophageal perforations at the time of endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective evaluation of frequency, outcomes, and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol 104:53–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson JA, Hoffman B, Hawes RH, Romagnuolo J (2010) EUS in patients with surgically altered upper GI anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 72:947–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T et al (2009) Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures Gastrointest Endosc 70:1060–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi CW, Kim GH, Kang DH et al (2010) Associated factors for a hyperechogenic pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 14:4329–4334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SH, Ozden N, Pawa R et al (2010) Periductal hypoechoic sign: an endosonographic finding associated with pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 71:249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Puli SR, Singh S, Hagedorn CH et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of EUS for vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 65:788–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snady H, Bruckner H, Siegel J et al (1994) Endoscopic ultrasonographic criteria of vascular invasion by potentially resectable pancreatic tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 40:326–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosch T, Dittler H-J, Strobel K et al (2000) Endoscopic ultrasound criteria for vascular invasion in the staging of cancer of the head of the pancreas: a blind reevaluation of videotapes. Gastrointest Endosc 52:469–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bach CM (2003) Melanoma of the skin. In: Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al. (eds) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition. New York, Springer-Verlag, pp 209–220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 8:935–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakao A, Takeda S, Sakai M et al (2004) Extended radical resection versus standard resection for pancreatic cancer: the rationale for extended radical resection. Pancreas 28:289–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catalano MF, Sivak MV, Rice T et al (1994) Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointest Endosc 40:442–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ (1997) A comparison of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc 45:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Baron PL et al (1997) Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 29:854–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL et al (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99:844–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buscarini E, De Angelis C, Arcidiacono PG et al (2006) Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications. Dig Liver Dis 38:762–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Braden B et al (2008) Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:590–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P (2006) Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12:246–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R et al (2010) Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 42:564–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saftoiu A, Iordache S, Gheonea DI et al (2010) Combined contrast-enhanced power Doppler and real-time sonoelastography performed during EUS, used in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses Gastrointest Endosc 72:739–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories E et al (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy 38:344–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giovannini M, Botelberge T, Bories E et al (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a prospective multicentre study. World J Gastroenterol 15:1587–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I et al (2010) Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology 139:1172–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosch T, Braig C, Gain T et al (1992) Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography: comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography. Gastroenterology 102:188–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palazzo L, Roseau G, Gayet B et al (1993) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan. Endoscopy 25: 143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Müller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P et al (1994) Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 190:745–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marty O, Aubertin JM, Bouillot JL et al (1995) Prospective comparison of ultrasound endoscopy and computed tomography in the assessment of locoregional invasiveness of malignant ampullary and pancreatic tumors verified surgically. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19:197–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mertz HR, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D, Leach SD (2000) EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 52:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rivadeneira DE, Pochapin M, Grobmyer SR et al (2003) Comparison of linear array endoscopic ultrasound and helical computed tomography for the staging of periampullary malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 10:890–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M et al (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141:753–763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mansfield SD, Scott J, Oppong K et al (2008) Comparison of multislice computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography with operative and histological findings in suspected pancreatic and periampullary malignancy. Br J Surg 95:1512–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    DeWitt J, Deveraux BM, Lehman GA et al (2006) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancretic cancer: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:717–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG et al (2005) Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100:2658–2661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramsay D, Marshall M, Song S et al (2004) Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Australas Radiol 48:154–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C et al (2004) Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 99:492–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Noda Y et al (2011) Lateral spread along the main pancreatic duct in branch-duct intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: usefulness of intraductal ultrasonography for its evaluation. Dig Endosc 23:62–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kubo H, Chijiiwa Y, Akahoshi K et al (2000) Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumours by endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1429–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sawai Y, Yamao K, Bhatia V et al (2010) Development of pancreatic cancers during long-term follow-up of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopy 42:1077–1784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E et al (2004) Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 126:1330–1336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thosani N, Thosani S, Qiao W et al (2010) Role of EUSFNA-based cytology in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 55:2756–2766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al-Haddad M, Gill KR, Raimondo M et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard fine-needle aspiration in evaluating cystic pancreatic lesions: a controlled study. Endoscopy 42:127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen CH, Yang CC, Yeh YH et al (2009) Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI. J Clin Ultrasound 37:18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H et al (2010) Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 71:951–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D et al (2003) EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 57:510–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E (2011) Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:367–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M et al (2009) EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1251–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stevens T, Lopez R, Adler DG et al (2010) Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 71:519–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Buscarini E, De Lisi S, Arcidiacono PG et al (2011) Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 28:2080–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kubota K, Kato S, Akiyama T et al (2009) A proposal for differentiation between early-and advanced-stage autoimmune pancreatitis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Digestive Endoscopy 21:162–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott M, Ignee A (2009) Real time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 41:718–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Giovannini M (2007) Endosonography: new developments in 2006. Scientific World Journal 2:341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Voermans RP, Ponchon T, Larghi A et al (2010) Randomized controlled comparison of forward-viewing versus oblique-viewing EUS-scopes in drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 71: AB135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Varadarajulu S, Trevino J, Wilcox CM et al (2010) Randomized trial comparing EUS and surgery for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 71:AB116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Wiersema MJ et al (2008) Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasoundguided direct ganglia neurolysis and block. Am J Gastroenterol 103:98–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Eloubeidi MA (2011) Initial evaluation of the forward-viewing echoendoscope prototype for performing fine-needle aspiration, Tru-cut biopsy, and celiac plexus neurolysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chang KJ, Nguyen PT, Thompson JA et al (2000) Phase I clinical trial of allogeneic mixed lymphocyte culture (cytoimplant) delivered by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle injection in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 88:1325–1335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hecht JR, Bedford R, Abbruzzese JL et al (2003) A phase I/II trial of intratumoral endoscopic ultrasound injection of ONYX-015 with intravenous gemcitabine in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 9:555–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Farrell JJ, Senzer N, Hecht JR et al (2006) Long-term data for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and percutaneous (PTA) guided intratumoral TNFerade gene delivery combined with chemoradiation in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Gastrointest Endosc 63:AB93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jin Z, Du Y, Li Z et al (2008) Endoscopic ultrasonographyguided interstitial implantation of iodine 125-seeds combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 40:314–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Park WG, Yan BM, Schellenberg D et al (2010) EUS-guided gold fiducial insertion for image-guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer: 50 successful cases without fluoroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 71:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gan SI, Thompson CC, Lauwers GY et al (2005) Ethanol lavage of pancreatic cystic lesions: initial pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 61:746–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    DeWitt J, DiMaio CJ, Brugge WR (2010) Long-term followup of pancreatic cysts that resolve radiologically after EUSguided ethanol ablation. Gastrointest Endosc 72:862–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Oh HC, Seo DW, Song TJ et al (2011) Endoscopic ultrasonographyguided ethanol lavage with paclitaxel injection treats patients with pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 140:172–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyMaggiore HospitalCremaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EndoscopyEuropean Institute of Oncology (IEO)MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations