Skip to main content

Type of Devices for Mid- and Long-term Venous Access

  • Chapter
Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices
  • 1275 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the principal devices used for mid- and long-term venous access: midlines, central venous catheters, and implanted ports.

Midline catheters can be classified between peripheral short catheters and central venous catheters, but should not be used for periods exceeding 15 days nor for drips of irritating products or hyperosmolar infusions.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are ideal for frequent or continuous venous access over mid- and long-term periods. CVCs can be cuffed or non-cuffed, tunnelled or non-tunnelled, implanted in a central vein or a peripheral vein (PICCs).

Implanted ports carry a very low risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Some of them can now be used for high-pressure contrast media injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Galloway S, Bodenham A (2004) Long-term central venous access. Br J Anaesth 92:722–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sansivero GE (2010) Features and selection of vascular access devices. Semin Oncol Nurs 26:88–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP et al (2002) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mermel LA, Parenteau S, Tow SM (1995) The risk of midline catheterization in hospitalized patients. A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 123:841–844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P et al (2001) Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology 220:655–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadman A, Lawrance JA, Fitzsimmons L et al (2004) To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 59:349–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caers J, Fontaine C, Vinh-Hung V et al (2005) Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. Support Care Cancer 13:325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keohane PP, Jones BJ, Attrill H et al (1983) Effect of catheter tunnelling and a nutrition nurse on catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. A controlled trial. Lancet 2:1388–1390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Timsit JF, Sebille V, Farkas JC et al (1996) Effect of subcutaneous tunneling on internal jugular catheter-related sepsis in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized multicenter study. JAMA 276:1416–1420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C et al (1999) Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheterrelated infection. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 130:729–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ (2006) The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1159–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scribner BH (1973) A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136:602–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA et al (1979) A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148:871–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Biffi R, De Braud F, Orsi F et al (2001) A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients. Cancer 92:1204–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133:381S–453S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Debourdeau P, Kassab Chahmi D, Le Gal G et al (2009) 2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group. Ann Oncol 20:1459–1471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW et al (1982) Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 92:706–712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ecoff L, Barone RM, Simons RM (1983) Implantable infusion port (Port-A-Cath). NITA 6:406–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bothe A Jr, Piccione W, Ambrosino JJ et al (1984) Implantable central venous access system. Am J Surg 147:565–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wieners G, Redlich U, Dudeck O et al (2009) [First experiences with intravenous port systems authorized for high pressure injection of contrast agent in multiphasic computed tomography]. Rofo 181:664–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Desruennes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desruennes, E. (2012). Type of Devices for Mid- and Long-term Venous Access. In: Di Carlo, I., Biffi, R. (eds) Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2372-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2373-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics