Skip to main content

Verifying Catheter Tip Position: Fluoroscopy vs Intravasal Electrogram

  • Chapter
  • 1196 Accesses

Abstract

Taking into account the hazards of blindly positioning of catheter tips and the full subcutaneous implantation of ports, it is important to assess a correct catheter tip location during insertion of the device, for later corrections are cumbersome or impossible without a new procedure. Perioperative fluoroscopy was considered as the golden standard for this control as it allows to visualise the catheter in situ and to perform correcting manoeuvres when needed. This can be done under direct 2-dimentional real-time imaging, but patients and care providers are repeatedly exposed to a small amount of radiation, and false-positive results are not fully ruled out. An alternative assessment method, based on electrocardiographic principles, could be useful to determine the best location for the catheter tip and to assist precise positioning. Indeed, the shape of the intravasal electrocardiogram waves (IEG) is closely related to the place where they are captured. Tracking changes in the IEG pattern, mainly involving the P-wave of the ECG complex taken inside large vessels or heart allows thus to position catheter tips very accurately. For this technique, a conductive solution or a metallic guidewire can be used as guidance systems. This chapter will describe the theoretical basis of the Intravasal Electrogram and its application to perioperative central catheter positioning, and will provide a comparison with fluoroscopic performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De Wever I, Stas M, Mulier S (1998) Poorten en Katheters voor langdurige I.V. therapie, Universitaire Pers, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cadman A, Lawrance JA, Fitzsimmons L et al (2004) To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 59:349–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fricke BL, Racadio JM, Duckworth T et al (2005) Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters without fluoroscopy in Children: Initial Catheter Tip Position. Radiology 234:887–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Food and Drug Administration Task Force (1989) Precautions necessary with central venous catheters. FDA Drug Bulletin 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neubauer AP (1995) Percutaneous central iv access in the neonate: experience with 535 silastic catheters. Acta Paediatr 84:756–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu K-S, Hsu J-H, Wang S-S et al (2004) Accurate Central Venous Port-A-Catheter Placement: Intravenous Electrocardiography and Surface Landmark Techniques Compared by Using Transesophageal Echocardiography. Aesth Analg 98:910–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stas M, Mulier S, Pattyn P et al (2001) Peroperative intravasal electrographic control of catheter tip position in access ports placed by venous cut-down technique EJSO 27:316–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Storm ES, Miller DL, Hoover LJ et al (2006) Radiation Doses from Venous Access Procedures. Radiology 238:1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hellerstein HK, Pritchard WH, Lewiw RL (1949) Recording of intracavity potentials through a single lumen, saline filled cardiac catheter. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 71:58–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman HH (1985) Diagnostic electrography and vectography. McGraw-Hill, New-York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Josephson ME, Seides SF (1979) Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology. Techniques and Interpretations. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher JJ, Kasell JH, Cox JL et al (1982) Techniques of intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping. Am J Cardiol 49:221–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schummer W, Schummer C, Schelenz C et al (2004) Central venous catheters-the inability of ‘intra-atrial ECG’ to prove adequate positioning. Br J Anaesth 93:193–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeon Y, Ryu HG, Yoon SZ et al (2006) Transesophageal echographic evaluation of ECG-guided central venous catheter placement. Can J Anesth 53:978–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pawlik MT, Kutz N, Keyl C et al (2004) Central venous catheter placement: comparison of the intravascular guidewire and the fluid column electrocardiograms. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21(8):594–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McGee WT, Ackerman BL, Rouben LR et al (1993) Accurate placement of central venous catheters: A prospective randomized, multicenter trial. Crit-Care-Med 21:1118–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsui BCH, Richards GJ, Van Aerde J (2005) Umbilical vein catheterization under electrocardiogram guidance. Pediatric Anesthesia 15:297–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pittiruti M, La Greca A, Scopettuolo G (2011) The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters. J Vasc Access (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kowalski CM, Kaufman JA, Rivitz SM et al (1997) Migration of central venous catheters: implications for initial catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:443–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schutz JCL, Patel AA, Clark TWI et al (2004) Relationship between Chest Port Catheter Tip Position and Port Malfunction after Interventional Radiologic Placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:581–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gebhard RE, Szmuk P, Pivalizza EG et al (2007) The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement. Anaesth Analg 104:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JH, Bahk JH, Ryu HG et al (2009) Comparison of the bedside central venous catheter placement techniques: landmark vs electrocardiogram guidance. Br J Anaesth 102:662–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marguerite Stas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stas, M., Willems, R. (2012). Verifying Catheter Tip Position: Fluoroscopy vs Intravasal Electrogram. In: Di Carlo, I., Biffi, R. (eds) Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2373-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2372-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2373-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics