Abstract
The diagnosis of hepatic neoplasms represents a challenging issue in abdominal radiology as it requires the careful analysis of multiple clinical and imaging parameters. First of all, the radiologist should have at hand precise clinical information, such as the patient’s age, sex, clinical history, lab test results, and clinical presentation [1]. Then, findings of previous imaging tests should be accurately reviewed. This is followed by choosing the most accurate imaging modality allowing characterization of the (suspected) hepatic neoplasm. The imaging protocol, including acquisition parameters and contrast medium choice, needs to be tailored to the patient’s case. The final, and obviously important, step is the image review. Image interpretation is strongly influenced by the radiologist’s experience. It requires a systematic approach in which all imaging findings are accurately reviewed and interpreted, leading to the correct diagnosis. The latter is achieved when it has been clearly demonstrated that the lesion shows the typical findings and clinical history described in the literature. However, there will also be many cases requiring that the radiologist is aware of the limits of diagnostic imaging, as in the case of a hepatic tumor with an atypical appearance or a mismatch between the imaging findings and the clinical data.
Keywords
- Liver Metastasis
- Hepatic Neoplasm
- Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- Perceptive Error
- Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mankad K, Hoey ET, Jones JB et al (2009) Radiology errors: how we learn from our mistakes. Clin Radiol 64:988–983
Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiwa T et al (2001) Unusual hemodynamic and pseudolesions of the noncirrhotic liver at CT. Radiographics 21:81–96
Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN et al (2011) The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Acta Radiol 52:467–472
Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235:872–878
Martin-Benitez G, Marti-Bonmati L, Barber C et al (2011) Hepatic lipomas and steatosis: An association beyond chance. Eur J Radiol doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.018
Goodwin MD, Dobson JE, Sirlin CB et al (2011) Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with Hepatocyte-spcific Constrast agent. Radiographics 31:1547–1568
Morgan G, Superina R (1994) Congenital absence of the portal vein: two cases and a proposed classification system for portasystemic vascular anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 29:1239–1241
Chandler TM, Heran MK, Chang SD, et al (2011) Multiple focal nodular hyperplasia lesions of the liver associated with congenital absence of the portal vein. Magnetic resonance Imaging 29:81–96
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ragozzino, A., Catalano, O., Paolantonio, P. (2012). Errors in the Diagnosis of Hepatic Neoplasms. In: Romano, L., Pinto, A. (eds) Errors in Radiology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2339-0_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2338-3
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2339-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)