Advertisement

Errors in Radiology: Definition and Classification

  • Antonio Pinto
  • Maria Giuseppina Scuderi
  • Stefania Daniele

Abstract

As indicated by the title of the landmark report of the Institute of Medicine, “To Err is Human” mistakes are part of the human condition [1]. They cannot be prevented by trying harder. At best, systematic changes are needed to prevent physician’s from doing the wrong thing while making it more likelyl that they will do the right thing. This is accomplished by hardwiring functions into medical systems and providing information at the point of care [2].

Keywords

Medical Error Observer Error Diagnostic Error Medical Malpractice Perceptual Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (editors) (1999) To err is human: building a safer healthsystem. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gluck PA (2007) Patient safety in women’s health care: a framework for progress. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:525–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fileni A, Magnavita N, Mirk P et al (2010) Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in Italy: an observational study over a 14-year period. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1040–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinto A, Brunese L (2010) Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol 2:377–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berlin L (1986) Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:1291–1298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spring DB, Tennenhouse DJ (1986) Radiology malpractice lawsuits: California jury verdicts. Radiology 159:811–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ et al (2006) Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 296:1071–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N et al (1991) The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 324:377–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW et al (1995) The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 163:458–471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grober ED, Bohnen JMA (2005) Defining medical error. Can J Surg 48:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson RM, Harrison GB, Gibberd RW et al (1999) An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 170:411–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR et al (1999) Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Medical Care 38:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leape L (1994) Error in medicine. JAMA 272:1851–1857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reason JT (2001) Understanding adverse events: the human factor. In: Vincent C (editor). Clinical risk management: enhancing patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group, London pp 9–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siewert B, Sosna J, McNamara A et al (2008) Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance. RadioGraphics 28:623–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berlin L (2007) Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:517–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D (1978) Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 13:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Samuel S, Kundel HL, Nodine CF et al (1995) Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. Radiology 194:895–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woodring JH (1990) Pitfalls in the radiologic diagnosis of lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:1165–1175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yerushalmy J (1969) The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin North Am 7:381–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pitman AG (2006) Perceptual error and the culture of open disclosure in Australian radiology. Australas Radiol 50:206–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berlin L (2000) Malpractice issues in radiology. Alliterative errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:925–931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinto A, Acampora C, Pinto F et al (2011) Learning from diagnostic errors: a good way to improve education in radiology. Eur J Radiol 78:372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American College of Radiology (2005) ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. In: 2005 Practice guideline & technical standards. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA pp 5–9Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berlin L (2005) Errors of omission. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1416–1421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrigal CL, Erly WK (2007) On-call radiology: community standards and current trends. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 28:85–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Pinto
    • 1
  • Maria Giuseppina Scuderi
    • 1
  • Stefania Daniele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Radiological Imaging“A. Cardarelli” HospitalNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations