Skip to main content

Abstract

Physicians are professionals, and the highest professional ethical standard places the welfare of the professional’s patients first and foremost. Problems involved with intensive care and organ failure exemplify both the high cost of health care and poor or limited prognosis of terribly sick patients in combination with concerns about privacy, dignity, the primacy of the individual, and the right to die peacefully with one’s loved ones close at hand. No respectable physician prolongs life by mechanical or artificial means when it is unnecessary, unqualitative, or futile. But how does one determine necessity or quality or futility? Ethical discussions abound; living wills attempt to control one’s fate, and legal battles continue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baue AE (1990) The sociology of multiple organ failure. In: Baue AE, Multiple organ failure: Patient care and prevention. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp 515–518

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baue AE (1990) The patient as a person: Ethical considerations of patients with multiple organ failure. In: Baue AE, Multiple organ failure: Patient care and prevention. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp 512–514

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taber R (1976) Preventing ulcer bleeding in multiple systems failure. Arch Surg 111:93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaus K (1974) Biomedical ethics: Morality for the new medicine. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harron F, Burnside J, Beauchamp T (1983) Health and human values: A guide to making your own decisions. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levine H (1986) Life choices: Confronting the life and death decisions created by modern medicine. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bulger RJ (1987) On the drinking of hemlock: Socrates, Semmelweis, and Barbara McClintock; Erikson EH: The Golden Rule and the cycle of life; Pellegrino ED: Toward an expanded medical ethics: the Hippocratic ethic revisted. In: Bulger RJ (ed) In search of the modern Hippocrates. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  8. Behringer E, Steinberger HA, Price J et al (1996) Correlations between do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and advanced directives in SICU patients who expire. Crit Care Med 24:A2

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fakhry SM, Gaafar BS, Welna SM et al (1996) “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in critical care: An immediate prelude to withdrawal of support. Crit Care Med 24:A2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cantor NL (1996) Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand “medically inappropriate” life support for incompetent patients? Crit Care Med 24(5):883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA (1996) Judicial intervention in medical decision-making: A failure of the medical system? Crit Care Med 24(5):730–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Compiled from News Services (1995) Patients’ care seldom matches their wishes: Efforts to prolong life cause suffering for dying, study finds, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Wednesday, November 22

    Google Scholar 

  13. Connors Jr AF, Dawson NV (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (Support). JAMA 274(20): 1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lo B (1995) Improving care near the end of life: Why is it so hard? JAMA 274(20): 1634–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kassirer JP (1994) Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Eng J Med 330(26): 1895–1896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Konopad E, Noseworthy TW, Johnston R et al (1995) Quality of life measures before and one year after admission to an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 23(10): 1653–1659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eiseman B (1995) Independence, pain relief rated top therapeutic goals: Elderly emphasize quality of life over duration. General Surgery & Laparoscopy News, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  18. Testa MA, Simonson DC (1996) Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. Current Concepts 334(13):835–840

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alpers A, Lo B (1995) When is CPR futile? JAMA 273(2):156–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis R, Park DR, Krone MR et al (1995) Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA 273(2): 124–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Luce JM (1995) Physicians do not have a responsibility to provide futile or unreasonable care if a patient or family insists. Crit Care Med 23(4):760–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Civetta JM (1996) A practical approach to futile care. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 81(2):24–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baue, A.E., Baue, R.D. (1997). Medical Decision Making in Critical Care The Patient as a Person. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2296-6_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2296-6_92

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75032-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2296-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics