Instrumental Evaluation of the Posture

  • M. Magnusson


Most common human activities require the ability to stabilize the human body in upright stance, to counteract perturbations and to allow voluntary movements, according to gravitational forces. The Standing human is an unstable physical structure. To counteract the effects of gravity and comply with the requirements to stabilize the body during voluntary movements there is a continuous modulation of motor activity, especially in so-called anti-gravity muscles, based on the also continuously changing afferent sensory information (Fig. 1). The postural control of the Standing human can therefore be considered in part adynamic feedbackcontrol [1]. Furthermore, based on experience and Visual information, the Standing human may foresee perturbations or changing requirements in advance, thus adding a substantial degree of anticipatory or feed-forward control [2]. To evaluate the significance on postural control of observations or test results it is necessary to bear in mind the physiological background and ability to maintain upright stance. Postural control cannot be considered a strictly hierarchical System but rather is characterized by decentralized or local decisions in a way which allows comparisons with the populär algorithms of neural networks [2]. Furthermore, there is a substantial amount of redundancy [2, 3].


Postural Control Quiet Stance Upright Stance Vestibular Lesion Posterior Fossa Lesion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Johansson R, Magnusson M, Åkesson M (1988) Identification of human posture dynamics IEEE. Trans Biomed Eng 35:858–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johansson R, Magnusson M (1991) Human postural dynamics. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:413–437Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz V (1992) Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. Physiol Rev 72 1:33–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Magnusson M, Johansson K, Johansson BB (1994) Sensory Stimulation pro-motes normalization of postural control after stroke. Stroke 25:1176–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silfverskiöld BP (1977) Cortical cerebellar degeneration associated with a specific disorder of standing and locomotion. Acta Neurol Scand 55:257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindmark B, Hamrin E (1988) Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active Intervention. Scand J Rehab Med 20:103–109Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gabeil A, Simmons MB (1982) Balance coding. Phys Ther 68:286–288Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tinetti ME (1986) Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:119–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horak FB (1987) Clinical measurement of postural control in adults. Phys Ther 67:1881–1885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL (1992) Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:1073–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S (1990) Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 45:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ekdahl C, Jarnlo GB, Andersson SI (1989) Standing balance in healthy subjects. Evaluation of a quantitative test battery on a force platform. Scand J Rehabil Med 21:187–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Östlund H (1979) A study of aim and strategy of stability control in quasistationary Standing. Thesis, Deptartment of Neurology and Research, St. Lars Sjukhus, LundGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norré ME (1990) Posture in otoneurology, vol 1. Acta Otorhinolaryngol (Belg) 44:55–181Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brandt T (1988) Sensory function and posture. Posture and gait. Exerpta medica. International congress series 812:127–136Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magnusson M, Enbom H, Johansson R, Wiklund J (1991) Significance of pressor input from the feet in lateral postural control — the effect of hypothermia on galvanically induced body sway. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 110:321–327Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lund S, Broberg C (1983) Effects of different head positions on postural sway in man induced by a reproducible vestibular error signal. Acta Physiol Scand 117(2):307–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55 (6): 1369–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eklundh G (1971) Some physical properties of muscle vibrators used to elicit tonic proprioceptive reflexes in man. Acta Soc Med Upsal 76:271–279Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aalto H, Pyykkö I, Starck J (1988) Computerized posturography, a development of the measuring System. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 449:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pyykkö I, Enbom H, Magnusson M, Schalen L (1991) Effect of proprioceptor Stimulation on postural stability in patients with peripheral or central vestibular lesion. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 111(1 ):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bronstein AM, Hood JD, Gresty MA, Panagi C, (1990) Visual control of balance in cerebellar and parkinsonian Syndromes. Brain 113:767–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Magnusson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations