Some Problems of Craniopharyngioma Treatment



Over the past decades the results of surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas have substantially improved due to precise diagnosis using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), better surgical technique, and more effective postoperative intensive care. Some neurosurgeons have achieved very impressive and promising results (Suzuki et al. 1984; Symon and Sprich 1985; Yasargil et al. 1987; Choux et al.1991). In spite of this, the treatment of craniopharyngiomas as a whole still presents one of the most serious neurosurgical problems.


Pituitary Stalk Tumor Capsule Radical Removal Skull Base Surgery Giant Cyst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Choux M, Lena G, Genitori L (1991) Le craniopharyngiome de l’enfant. Neurochirurgie 37 [Suppl 1]: 1–174Google Scholar
  2. Konovalov AN (1994) Surgery of cranioharyngiomas and gliomas of the chiasma and the third ventricle. In: Samii M (ed) Skull base surgery. First Int Skull Base Congr, Hannover 1992. Karger, Basel, pp 408–411Google Scholar
  3. Suzuki J, Katakura R, Mori T (1984) Interhemispheric approach through the lamina terminalis to the tumor of the anterior part of the III ventricle. Surg Neurol 22:157–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Symon L, Sprich W (1985) Radical excision of craniopharyngiomas. Results of 20 patients. J Neurosurg 62:174–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Yasargil MG, Reody PJ, Roth P (1987) Combined approaches. In: Apuzzo MLJ (ed) Surgery of the third ventricle. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Burdenko InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations