New Sensors for Pacing and Diagnostic Application: What Is Their Clinical Uselfulness?

  • Ph Ritter


Modern cardiac pacemakers are capable of storing cardiac events on a long-term basis in their RAM. These data provide information on the pacemaker operation and on the patient’s health status and can be retrieved during the follow-up visits. The diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias has become a reality that is reliable and clinically relevant. In rate-responsive pacing, additional information can be retrieved from the retrospective examination of the sensor activity, which provides the physician with a display of the patient’s heart rate profiles during daily life. The diagnosis of chronotropic incompetence can be objectively validated, and the appropriateness of the sensor operation reliably verified. This may prompt reprogramming of the pacemaker to adjust the sensor-driven rates and better match the patient’s needs. However, no device currently available is able to provide enough information to assist in the diagnosis of comorbidity.


Vasovagal Syncope Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Chronotropic Incompetence Pace Output Heart Rate Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ritter P, Anselme F, Bonnet JL et al (1997) Clinical evaluation of an automatic slope calibration in a minute ventilation controlled DDDR pacemaker. PACE 20: 1173 (abstr)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pioger G, Geroux L, Limousin M (1997) Automatic basic rate variation algorithm driven by a minute-ventilation sensor: clinical results. PACE 20: 1173 (abstr)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schuller H (1997) Low energy pacing and patient safety. PACE 20: 1190 (abstr)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lau CP (1997) Initial multi-centered North American experience with the AUTO-CAPTURE pacing system. PACE 20: 1172 (abstr)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sermasi S, Marconi M, Moracchini PV et al (1997) An Italian experience with the AUTOCAPTURE function: clinical results in a mild follow-up. PACE 20: 1228 (abstr)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenberg S, Crossley G, Ellenbogen K et al (1997) clinical experience with evoked response and polarization testing in the Microny/Regency SR+ pacemakers: Clinical efficacy of Autocapture. PACE 20:1172 (abstr)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rickards T, Bombardini T, Corbucci G et al (1996) An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility PACE 19: 2066–2071Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G et al (1996) Is local myocardial contractility related to endocardial acceleration signals detected by a transvenous pacing lead?. PACE 19: 1682–1688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deharo JC, Peyre JP, Ritter P et al (1997) A sensor-based evaluation of heart contractility in patients with head-up tilt induced neurally-mediated syncope. PACE 20: 1096 (abstr)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deharo JC, Peyre JP, Ritter Pet al (1997) Adaptive rate pacing controlled by a myocardial contractility index for treatment of malignant neurally-mediated syncope. PACE 20: 1192 (abstr)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Auer T, Schreier G, Hutten H et al (1995) Intramyocardial electrograms for monitoring of allograft rejection after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 27: 1983–1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schreier G, Kastner P, Hutten H et al (1996) Ventricular evoked responses versus spontaneous ventricular electrograms for long-term cardiac monitoring. Progress in Biomed Res Dec 6: 77–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ph Ritter
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre Chirurgical Val d’OrSaint-CloudFrance

Personalised recommendations