Advertisement

Vasovagal Syncope: To Tilt or Not to Tilt?

  • R. Sutton

Abstract

Tilt testing for the investigation of the clinical problem of syncope was introduced in the mid 1980s [1,2]. It represented an advance in the approach to this clinical arena, which had always offered serious challenges to physicians, because it became possible to reproduce the patient’s symptoms in front of the clinician. Furthermore, this gave an opportunity for monitoring of many physiological variables allowing greater understanding of the mechanism of vasovagal syncope, if not its trigger. Syncope is an infrequent event for most sufferers, once per month can be considered often, implying that it is extremely difficult to observe an attack by any type of monitor. Herein lies the value of tilt testing but more than 10 years of clinical experience have placed its benefits in perspective and, as other clinical tests, it is not perfect.

Keywords

Tilt Testing Vasovagal Syncope Tilt Table Testing Drug Challenge Unexplained Syncope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kenny RA, Ingram A, Bayliss J et al (1986) Head-up tilt: a useful test for investigating unexplained syncope. Lancet 1: 1352–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abi-Samra F, Maloney JD, Fouad-Tarazi FM et al (1988) The usefulness of head-up tilt testing and hemodynamic investigations in the workup of syncope of unknown origin. PACE 11: 1202–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevens PM (1966) Cardiovascular dynamics during orthostasis and the influence of intravascular instrumentation. Am J Cardiol 17: 211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kenny RA, Lyon C, Ingram A et al (1987) Enhanced vagal activity and normal arginine vasopressin reponse in carotid sinus syndrome: implications for a central abnormality in carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Cardiovasc Res 21: 545–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammill SC, Holmes DR Jr, Wood DL et al (1984) Electrophysiologic testing in the upright position: improved evaluation of patients with rhythm disturbances using a tilt table. J Am Coll Cardiol 4: 65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waxman MB, Yao L, Cameron D et al (1989) Isoproterenol induction of vasodepressor-type reaction in vasodepressor-prone persons. Am J Cardiol 63: 58–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petersen MEV, Williams TR, Gordon C et al (1997) The normal response to prolonged passive head-up tilt testing. Heart (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grubb BP, Wolfe DA, Temesy-Armos PN et al (1992) Reproducibility of head upright tilt test results in patients with syncope. PACE 15: 1477–1481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sutton R, Petersen MEV (1995) Invasive tilt testing: the search for a new sensor to permit earlier pacing therapy in vasovagal syncope. In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias 1995. Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano, pp 132–133Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moya A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda J et al (1995) Limitations of head-up tilt test for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in patients with vaso-vagal syncope: results of a controlled study of etilefrine versus placebo. J Am Coll Cardiol 25: 65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    VASIS Etilefrine study results to be published.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raviele A, Menozzi C, Brignole M et al (1995) Value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin to assess the origin of unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 76: 267–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McIntosh S, Lawson J, da Costa D et al (1996) Use of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate during head-up tilt as a provocation test for vasovagal responses in elderly patients with unexplained syncope. Cardiol Elderly 4: 33–38Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benditt D, Ferguson D, Grubb BP et al (1996) Tilt table testing for assessing syncope: ACC Expert Consensus Document. J Am Coll Cardiol 28: 263–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sra JS, Anderson AJ, Sheikh SH et al (1991) Unexplained syncope evaluated by electrophysiological studies and head-up tilt testing. Ann Intern Med 114: 1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krahne AD, Klein G, Norris C et al (1995) The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiologic testing. Circulation 92: 1819–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grubb BP, Kosinski D, Pothoulakis A (1995) New and emerging indications for head-up tilt table testing. Eur J Card Pacing Electrophysiol 5: 109–112Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutton R, Petersen MEV (1995) Expanding uses for tilt testing. Eur J Card Pacing Electrophysiol 5: 122–123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Sutton
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacing and ElectrophysiologyRoyal Brompton HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations