Skip to main content

Will the Use of Scores Benefit the Individual Patient and Improve Therapy?

  • Conference paper
Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction

Abstract

Since the introduction of a 10 point scale for newborn infants [1] in 1953 by Apgar numerous scores and scales have been developed in medicine. A score is an attempt to integrate many different information like blood pressure, heart rate or laboratory data into a single one-dimensional numerical value. The more complex a clinical situation is the more efforts are made to develop and refine score systems. Therefore, many scores for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been published.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth 32:260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee (1994) Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA 271:1200–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray LS, Teasdale GM, Murray GD et al (1993) Does prediction of outcome alter patient management? Lancet 341:1487–1491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson S, Bihari D, Smithies M et al (1994) Identification of futility in intensive care. Lancet 334:1203–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang RWS, Jacobs S, Lee B (1988) Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerized trend analysis of daily Apache II scores corrected for organ system failure. Intens Care Med 14:558–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang RWS (1989) Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units. Lancet ii: 143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers J, Fuller HD (1994) Use of daily Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores to predict individual patient survival rate. Crit Care Med 22:1402–1405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D (1995) Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: useful, misused, or abused? Intens Care Med 21:770–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lefering R, Dicke S, Böttcher, Neugebauer E (1997) Der Apache II Score bei Traumapatienten — Eine systematische Unterschätzung der Prognose. Intensivmed 34:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet ii: 81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goris RJA, te Boekhorst TPA, Nuytinck JKS, Gimbrere JSF (1985) Multiple organ failure. Generahzed autodestructive inflammation? Arch Surg 120:1109–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lefering, R., Goris, R.J.A. (1998). Will the Use of Scores Benefit the Individual Patient and Improve Therapy?. In: Baue, A.E., Berlot, G., Gullo, A. (eds) Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2271-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2271-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0297-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2271-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics