Skip to main content

Physical Agents in Bronchial Provocation Tests: Nebulized Hyperosmolar Aerosol

  • Chapter
Book cover Methods in Asthmology
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Probably the most important development leading to the recognition that abnormal osmolarity of the respiratory tract is a potent stimulus that can provoke airway narrowing was the introduction of ultrasonic nebulizers in the 1960s. Since these nebulizers produce dense aerosols (usually in excess of 3 ml of aerosol per minute), with a large proportion of respirable droplets [31], they were considered superior to the nebulizers and humidifiers available at that time [18–20]. However, it became apparent that inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized aerosols could be associated both with an increase in airway resistance [11, 22, 23, 30] and a decrease in arterial oxygen tension [23, 29] in patients with chronic bronchitis [11, 23], chronic obstructive airways disease [22, 29] and asthma [6, 11]. The use of ultrasonically nebulized aerosols specifically for the purpose of diagnosis and assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness was investigated in the 1970s by Allegra et al. [1, 3] and Allegra and Bianco [2], who used ultrasonically nebulized water to challenge patients with asthma. In 1981, Schoeffel et al. [25] extended these findings by demonstrating that the response to ultrasonically nebulized aerosols is largely determined by the osmolarity of the aerosol and that hyperosmolar aerosols are also potent agents for provoking airway narrowing in asthmatic subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allegra L, Bianco S, Petrigini G, Robuschi M (1974) Lo Sforzo muscolare e la nebulizzazione ultrasonica die H2O come tests di provocazione aspecifica del broncospasmo. In: Pasargiklian, Bocca (eds) Progressi in medicina respiratoria `74. Edizioni scientifiche terme e grandi alberghi di Sirmione, Sirmione, p 81

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allegra L, Bianco S (1980) Non-specific bronchoreactivity obtained with an ultrasonic aerosol of distilled water. Eur J Respir Dis 61: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allegra L, Robuschi M, Bianco S (1975) Tests di provocazione bronchiale aspecifica. In: Mellillo, Pisaneschi (eds) Attide110 Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiani Aerosol in Medicina. Terme di Tabiano, Salsomaggiore, pp 107–121

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson SD, Smith CM (1989) The use of non-isotonic aerosols for evaluating bronchial hyperresponsiveness. In: Spector S (ed) Provocative challenge procedures: background and methodology. Futura, Mount Kisco, pp 227–252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson SD, Schoeffel RE, Finney MJB (1983) Evaluation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions for provocation testing in patients with asthma. Thorax 28: 284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barker R, Levison H (1972) Effects of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water on airway dynamics in children with cystic fibrosis and asthma. J Pediatr 80: 396–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Belcher NG, Murdoch RD, Dalton N, House FR, Clark TJH, Rees PJ, Lee TH (1988) A comparison of mediator and catecholamine release between exercise-and hypertonic saline-induced asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 137: 1026–1032

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Belcher NG, Lee TH, Rees PJ (1989) Airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline, exercise and histamine challenges in bronchial asthma. Eur J Respir Dis 2: 44–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boucher RMG, Kreuter J (1968) The fundamentals of ultrasonic atomization of medical solutions. Ann Allergy 26: 591–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boulet L-P, Legris C, Thibault L, Turcotte H (1987) Comparative bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline and methacholine in asthma. Thorax 42: 953–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheney F, Butler J (1968) The effects of ultrasonically-produced aerosols on airway resistance in man. Anesthesiology 29: 1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eggleston PA, Kagey-Sobotka A, Lichtenstein LM (1987) A comparison of the osmotic activation of basophils and human lung mast cells. Am Rev Respir Dis 135: 1043–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eggleston PA, Kagey-Sobotka A, Schleimer RP, Lichtenstein LM (1984) Interaction between hyperosmolar and IgE-mediated histamine release from basophils and mast cells. Am Rev Respir Dis 130: 86–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eschenbacher WL, Boushey HA, Sheppard D (1984) Alterations in osmolarity of inhaled aerosols cause bronchoconstriction and cough, but absence of a permeant anion causes cough alone. Am Rev Respir Dis 129: 211–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eschenbacher WL, Gravelyn TR (1988) Mediator release after local osmolar challenge to the airways. In: Armour CL, Black JL (eds) Mechanisms in asthma: pharmacology, physiology and management. Liss, New York, pp 355–363

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finney MJB, Anderson SD, Black JL (1987) The effect of non-isotonic solutions on human isolated airway smooth muscle. Respir Physiol 69: 227–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finney MJB, Anderson SD, Black JL (1989) Terfenadine modifies airway narrowing induced by the inhalation of non-isotonic aerosols in subjects with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goddard RF, Mercer TT, O’Neill PXF, Flores RL, Sanchez R (1968) Output characteristics and clinical efficacy of ultrasonic nebulizers. J Asthma Res 5: 355–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris RL, Riley HD (1967) Reactions to aerosol medication in infants and children. J A M A 201: 953–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herzog P, Norlander OP, Engstrom C-G (1964) Ultrasonic generation of aerosol for the humidification of inspired gas during volume-controlled ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 8: 79–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Magyar P, Dervaderics M, Toth A (1984) Bronchial challenge with hypertonic KC1 solution in the diagnosis of bronchial asthma. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 114: 910–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malik SK, Jenkins DE (1972) Alterations in airway dynamics following inhalation of ultrasonic mist. Chest 62: 660–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pflug AE, Cheney FW, Butler J (1970) The effects of an ultrasonic aerosol on pulmonary mechanics and arterial blood gases in patients with chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 101: 710–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Phipps P, Borham P, Gonda I, Baily D, Bautovich G, Anderson S (1987) A rapid Physical Agents in Bronchial Provocation Tests 237 method for the evaluation of diagnostic radioaerosol delivery systems. Eur J Nucl Med 13: 183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoeffel RE, Anderson SD, Altounyan REC (1981) Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized solutions of distilled water and saline (Br Med J 283: 1285–1287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheppard D, Rizk NW, Boushey HA, Bethel RA (1983) Mechanism of cough and bronchoconstriction induced by distilled water aerosol. Am Rev Respir Dis 127: 691–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith CM, Anderson SD (1990) Provocation tests for asthma using non-isotonic aerosols. J Allergy Clin Immunol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith CM, Anderson SD (1989) Inhalation challenge using hypertonic (4.5%) saline in asthmatic subjects: a comparison with responses to hyperpnoea, methachohne and water. Eur Respir J (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taguchi JT (1971) Effect of ultrasonic nebulization on blood gas tensions in chronic obstructive lung disease. Chest 60: 356–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Waltemath CL, Bergman N (1973) Increased respiratory resistance provoked by enddtracheal administration of aerosols. Am Rev Respir Dis 108: 520–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolfsdorf J, Swift DL, Avery ME (1969) Mist therapy reconsidered; an evaluation of the respiratory deposition of labelled water aerosols produced by jet and ultrasonic nebulizers. Paediatrics 43: 799–808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, C.M. (1993). Physical Agents in Bronchial Provocation Tests: Nebulized Hyperosmolar Aerosol. In: Allegra, L., Braga, P.C., Dal Negro, R. (eds) Methods in Asthmology. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2263-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2263-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2265-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2263-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics