Advertisement

Physical Agents in Bronchial Provocation Tests: Nebulized Hyperosmolar Aerosol

  • C. M. Smith

Abstract

Probably the most important development leading to the recognition that abnormal osmolarity of the respiratory tract is a potent stimulus that can provoke airway narrowing was the introduction of ultrasonic nebulizers in the 1960s. Since these nebulizers produce dense aerosols (usually in excess of 3 ml of aerosol per minute), with a large proportion of respirable droplets [31], they were considered superior to the nebulizers and humidifiers available at that time [18–20]. However, it became apparent that inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized aerosols could be associated both with an increase in airway resistance [11, 22, 23, 30] and a decrease in arterial oxygen tension [23, 29] in patients with chronic bronchitis [11, 23], chronic obstructive airways disease [22, 29] and asthma [6, 11]. The use of ultrasonically nebulized aerosols specifically for the purpose of diagnosis and assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness was investigated in the 1970s by Allegra et al. [1, 3] and Allegra and Bianco [2], who used ultrasonically nebulized water to challenge patients with asthma. In 1981, Schoeffel et al. [25] extended these findings by demonstrating that the response to ultrasonically nebulized aerosols is largely determined by the osmolarity of the aerosol and that hyperosmolar aerosols are also potent agents for provoking airway narrowing in asthmatic subjects.

Keywords

Physical Agent Droplet Size Distribution Asthmatic Subject Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allegra L, Bianco S, Petrigini G, Robuschi M (1974) Lo Sforzo muscolare e la nebulizzazione ultrasonica die H2O come tests di provocazione aspecifica del broncospasmo. In: Pasargiklian, Bocca (eds) Progressi in medicina respiratoria `74. Edizioni scientifiche terme e grandi alberghi di Sirmione, Sirmione, p 81Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allegra L, Bianco S (1980) Non-specific bronchoreactivity obtained with an ultrasonic aerosol of distilled water. Eur J Respir Dis 61: 41–49Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allegra L, Robuschi M, Bianco S (1975) Tests di provocazione bronchiale aspecifica. In: Mellillo, Pisaneschi (eds) Attide110 Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiani Aerosol in Medicina. Terme di Tabiano, Salsomaggiore, pp 107–121Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson SD, Smith CM (1989) The use of non-isotonic aerosols for evaluating bronchial hyperresponsiveness. In: Spector S (ed) Provocative challenge procedures: background and methodology. Futura, Mount Kisco, pp 227–252Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson SD, Schoeffel RE, Finney MJB (1983) Evaluation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions for provocation testing in patients with asthma. Thorax 28: 284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker R, Levison H (1972) Effects of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water on airway dynamics in children with cystic fibrosis and asthma. J Pediatr 80: 396–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belcher NG, Murdoch RD, Dalton N, House FR, Clark TJH, Rees PJ, Lee TH (1988) A comparison of mediator and catecholamine release between exercise-and hypertonic saline-induced asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 137: 1026–1032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belcher NG, Lee TH, Rees PJ (1989) Airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline, exercise and histamine challenges in bronchial asthma. Eur J Respir Dis 2: 44–48Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boucher RMG, Kreuter J (1968) The fundamentals of ultrasonic atomization of medical solutions. Ann Allergy 26: 591–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boulet L-P, Legris C, Thibault L, Turcotte H (1987) Comparative bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline and methacholine in asthma. Thorax 42: 953–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheney F, Butler J (1968) The effects of ultrasonically-produced aerosols on airway resistance in man. Anesthesiology 29: 1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eggleston PA, Kagey-Sobotka A, Lichtenstein LM (1987) A comparison of the osmotic activation of basophils and human lung mast cells. Am Rev Respir Dis 135: 1043–1048PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eggleston PA, Kagey-Sobotka A, Schleimer RP, Lichtenstein LM (1984) Interaction between hyperosmolar and IgE-mediated histamine release from basophils and mast cells. Am Rev Respir Dis 130: 86–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eschenbacher WL, Boushey HA, Sheppard D (1984) Alterations in osmolarity of inhaled aerosols cause bronchoconstriction and cough, but absence of a permeant anion causes cough alone. Am Rev Respir Dis 129: 211–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eschenbacher WL, Gravelyn TR (1988) Mediator release after local osmolar challenge to the airways. In: Armour CL, Black JL (eds) Mechanisms in asthma: pharmacology, physiology and management. Liss, New York, pp 355–363Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finney MJB, Anderson SD, Black JL (1987) The effect of non-isotonic solutions on human isolated airway smooth muscle. Respir Physiol 69: 227–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finney MJB, Anderson SD, Black JL (1989) Terfenadine modifies airway narrowing induced by the inhalation of non-isotonic aerosols in subjects with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goddard RF, Mercer TT, O’Neill PXF, Flores RL, Sanchez R (1968) Output characteristics and clinical efficacy of ultrasonic nebulizers. J Asthma Res 5: 355–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris RL, Riley HD (1967) Reactions to aerosol medication in infants and children. J A M A 201: 953–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herzog P, Norlander OP, Engstrom C-G (1964) Ultrasonic generation of aerosol for the humidification of inspired gas during volume-controlled ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 8: 79–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magyar P, Dervaderics M, Toth A (1984) Bronchial challenge with hypertonic KC1 solution in the diagnosis of bronchial asthma. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 114: 910–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malik SK, Jenkins DE (1972) Alterations in airway dynamics following inhalation of ultrasonic mist. Chest 62: 660–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pflug AE, Cheney FW, Butler J (1970) The effects of an ultrasonic aerosol on pulmonary mechanics and arterial blood gases in patients with chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 101: 710–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phipps P, Borham P, Gonda I, Baily D, Bautovich G, Anderson S (1987) A rapid Physical Agents in Bronchial Provocation Tests 237 method for the evaluation of diagnostic radioaerosol delivery systems. Eur J Nucl Med 13: 183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schoeffel RE, Anderson SD, Altounyan REC (1981) Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized solutions of distilled water and saline (Br Med J 283: 1285–1287Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheppard D, Rizk NW, Boushey HA, Bethel RA (1983) Mechanism of cough and bronchoconstriction induced by distilled water aerosol. Am Rev Respir Dis 127: 691–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith CM, Anderson SD (1990) Provocation tests for asthma using non-isotonic aerosols. J Allergy Clin Immunol (in press)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith CM, Anderson SD (1989) Inhalation challenge using hypertonic (4.5%) saline in asthmatic subjects: a comparison with responses to hyperpnoea, methachohne and water. Eur Respir J (in press)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taguchi JT (1971) Effect of ultrasonic nebulization on blood gas tensions in chronic obstructive lung disease. Chest 60: 356–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waltemath CL, Bergman N (1973) Increased respiratory resistance provoked by enddtracheal administration of aerosols. Am Rev Respir Dis 108: 520–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wolfsdorf J, Swift DL, Avery ME (1969) Mist therapy reconsidered; an evaluation of the respiratory deposition of labelled water aerosols produced by jet and ultrasonic nebulizers. Paediatrics 43: 799–808Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Allergy and Allied Respiratory DisordersGuy’s HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations