Advertisement

Scanning Electron Microscopy: Notes on Basic Techniques for Investigating Pulmonary and Airway Structures

  • P. C. Braga

Abstract

The eye is probably the most important “sensor” of our body. Not only does it provide information about our surroundings, but this information is then used by the brain to control our interaction with the surroundings through feedback. It is a common observation that we cannot see structural details of either very minute objects or of larger objects at great distance, so the idea of magnifying images of the things that surround us has always fascinated man. From the earliest times, discoveries of magnifying devices such as drops of water, convex metal mirrors, and lenses have been reported, with records dating back to 1000 b.c. or even earlier. The Assyrians had a convex lens around 700 b.c., and the Greeks and Romans also wrote about magnifying lenses [1].

Keywords

Surface Tension Force Biological Specimen Alveolar Part Scanning Electron Microscope Specimen Scanning Electron Microscopy Preparation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scharf D (1979) Magnifications, photography with the scanning electron microscope. Muller, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradbury S (1968) The microscope, past and present. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burgess J, Marten M, Taylor R (1987) Microcosmos. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McMullan D (1989) SEM, past, present and future. J Microsc 155: 373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chescoe D, Goodhew PJ (1990) The operation of transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watti M (1985) Principles and practice of electron microscopy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scala C, Pasquinelli G (1987) Microscopia elettronica a scansione in biologia. Editrice CLUEB, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kessel RG, Shith CY (1976) Scanning electron microscopy in biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross N, Morgan AJ (1990) Cryopreparation of thin biological specimens for electron microscopy: methods and applications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayat (1981) Fixation for electron microscopy. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McDowell EM, Trump BF (1976) Histologic fixatives suitable for diagnostic light and electron microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 100: 405–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hulbert WC, Forster BB, Laird W, Phil CE, Walker DC (1982) An improved method for fixation of the respiratory epithelial surface with the mucous and surfactant layers. Lab Invest 47: 354363Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Litman RB, Barrnett RJ (1982) The mechanism of the fixation of tissue components by osmium tetroxide via hydrogen binding J Ultrastr Res 38: 63–86Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelley RO, Dekker RAF, Bluemink JG (1973) Ligand-mediated osmium binding: its application in coating biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 45: 254–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathieu O, Claassen H, Weibel ER (1978) Differential effect of glutaraldehyde and buffer osmolarity on cell dimensions: a study on lung tissue. J Ultrastruct Res 63: 20–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arborgh B, Bell P, Brunk U, Collins VP (1976) The osmotic effect of glutaraldehyde fixation. A transmission electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy and cytochemical study. J Ultrastruct Res 56: 331–350Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldeide-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137–138 AGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katsumoto T, Naguro T, Iino A, Takagi A (1981) The effect of tannic acid on the preservation of tissue culture cells for scanning electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 30: 177182Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gil J, Weibel ER (1968) The role of buffers in lung fixation with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide. J Ultrastruct Res 25: 331–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schiff RI, Gennaro JF (1979) The role of the buffer in the fixation of biological specimens for transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Scanning 2: 135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boyde A (1976) Do’s and don’ts in biological specimen preparation for the SEM. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 697–734Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson TF (1951) Techniques for the preservation of three-dimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope. Trans NY Acad Sci (Ser II ) 13: 130–134Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bastacky J, Hayes TL, Gelinas RP (1985) Quantitation of shrinkage during preparation for scanning electron microscopy: human lung. Scanning 7: 134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazzone RW, Komblau S, Durand CM (1980) Shrinkage of lung after chemical fixation for analysis of pulmonary structure-function relations. J Appl Physiol 48: 382–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wollweber L, Stacke R, Gothe U (1981) The use of a simple methods to avoid cell shrinkage during SEM preparation. J Microsc 121: 185–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Inouè T, Osatake H (1988) A new drying method of biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy, the t-butyl-alcohol freeze-drying method. Arch Histol Cytol 51: 53–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Echlin P (1975) Sputter coating techniques for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 8: 217–224Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Echlin P (1974) Coating techniques for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 7: 1019–1028Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holland VF (1976) Some artifacts associated with sputter-coated samples observed at high magnifications in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 71–74Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ingram P, Morosoff N, PopeL, Allen F, Tisher C (1976) Some comparisons of the techniques of sputter (coating) and evaporative coating for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 75–82Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyde A, Wood C (1969) Preparation of animal tissues for surface-scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 90: 221–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murakami T (1974) A revised tannin-osmium method for non-coated scanning electron microscope specimens. Arch Histol Jap 36: 189–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sasaki K (1988) A simple method to observe intracellular organelles with the scanning electron microscope. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 37: 171–173Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boyde A (1972) Biological specimen preparation for the scanning electron microscope, a overview. Scanning Electron Microsc 5: 257–264Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Malick LE,Wilson RB (1975) Evaluation of a modified technique for SEM examination for vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. Scanning Electron Microsc 8: 259–266Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Akahori I, Ishi H, Naka I, Yoshida H (1988) A simple freeze-drying device using t-butyl alcohol for SEM specimens. J Electron Microsc 37: 351352Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Osatake H, Atom K, Mitsushima A, Tanak K (1980) A simple method of freeze-drying for scanning electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 29: 72–74Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Demsey A, Kawka D, Stackpole C (1978) Cell surface membrane organization revealed by freeze-drying. J Ultrastruct Res 62: 13–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fujikawa S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa T, Sakurai S, Hasegawa Y (1988) Continuous observation of frozen biological material with cryo-scanning electron microscope and freeze-replica by a new cryosystem. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 37: 315–322Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Humphreys WJ, Spurlock BO, Johnson S (1974) Critical point drying of ethanol-infiltrated cryofractured biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 7: 275–282Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tokunaga J, Edanaga N, Fujita T, Adachi K (1974) Freeze cracking of scanning electron microscope specimens. A study of the kidney and spleen. Arch Histol Jap 37: 165–182Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boyde A (1974) Freezing, freeze-fracturing and freeze-drying in biological specimen preparation for the SEM. Scanning Electron Microsc pp 10431046Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roth J, Meyer HW (1972) Electron microscopic studies in mammalian lungs by freeze-etching: III. The bronchiolar cells with special consideration of the Clara cells. Exp Pathol 7: 71–83Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Anderson PM (1979) The respiratory system. In: Hodges CM, Hallowes RC (eds) Biomedical research application of scanning electron microscopy, vol 1. London, pp 177–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. C. Braga
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro di Farmacologia Respiratoria, Facoltà di Medicina e ChirurgiaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations