Advertisement

Some Questions on Material Objectivity Arising in Models of Porous Materials

  • Krzysztof Wilmanski

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the analysis of nonobjective contributions to continuous models of porous materials. Explicit contributions appearing in momentum balance equations in noninertial reference systems influence Darcy’s law considered as a limit case of a multicomponent model, and render it nonobjective. On the other hand an implicit constitutive contribution of relative accelerations to partial momentum balance equations of multicom-ponent models violates the principle of material objectivity. These two types of contribution bear physically different significances. The former seems to be a natural consequence of body forces on relative motions of components. The latter is incompatible with principles of a macroscopical continuous model. Even if we ignore the principle of material objectivity, contributions of relative accelerations are either indistinguishable from other contributions or yield unacceptable modes of propagation of sound waves or both. Consequently, in contrast to the nonobjectivity of Darcy’s law, we conclude that such contributions should be ignored completely in the construction of macroscopical models of porous materials.

Keywords

Porous Material Material Objectivity Macroscopical Model Fluid Component Relative Acceleration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Biot, M. A. (1956): Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low-frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 28, 168–178MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Müller, I. (1985): Thermodynamics. Pitman, BostonMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wilmanski, K. (1998): Thermomechanics of continua. Springer, BerlinMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Albers, B., Wilmanski, K. (1999): An axisymmetric steady-state flow through a poroelastic medium under large deformations. Arch. Appl. Mech. 69, 121–132ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wilmanski, K. (1999): Waves in porous and granular materials. In: Hutter, K., Wilmanski, K. (eds.) Kinetic and continuum theories of granular and porous media, Springer, Vienna, pp. 131–185Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Gajo, A. (1996): The effects of inertial coupling in the interpretation of dynamic soil tests. Geotech. 46, 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gajo, A., Fedel, A., Mongiovi, J. (1997): Experimental analysis of the effects of fluidsolid coupling on the velocity of elastic waves in saturated porous media. Geotech. 47, 993–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Brennen, CE. (1995): Cavitation and bubble dynamics. Oxford Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bear, J. (1988): Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Dover, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Wilmanski, K. (2001): Note on the notion of incompressibility in thermodynamic the ories of porous and granular materials. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 81, 37–42MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Müller, I., Ruggeri, T. (1998): Rational extended thermodynamics. Second ed. Springer, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krzysztof Wilmanski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations