Isolated First-Degree Atrioventricular Block: A New Indication for Dual-Chamber Pacing?

  • R. Cazzin
  • P. Golia
  • C. Bonanno
  • C. Lestuzzi
  • V. Proietti
Conference paper


Since the importance of the atrioventricular (AV) interval in cardiac hemodynamics has been realized, first-degree atrioventricular AV block has been considered as one of the possible indications for permanent cardiac pacing.


Sick Sinus Syndrome Versus Block Versus Interval Atrial Systole Apical Pace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mabo P, Cazeau S, Forrer A, Varin C, De Place C, Paillard F, Daubert C (1992) Permanent DDD pacing for very long PR interval alone. PACE 15: 509Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brinker JA (1989) Pursuing the perfect pacemaker. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hochleitner M, Hortnagl H, Hortnagl H, Fridrich L, Gschnitzer F (1992) Long-term efficacy of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of end-stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 70: 1318–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cannon RO III, Dilsiziam V, Bonow RO et al (1992) Symptom, hemodynamic and myocardial benefit of atrial synchronized ventricular pacing in non-obstructive hypertrophie cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 120Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haskell RJ, French WJ (1986) Optimum AV interval in dual chamber pacemakers PACE 9: 670–675Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ovsyshcher I, Zimlichman R, Katz A, Bondy C, Ferman S (1993) Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 761–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janosik DL, Pearson AC, Buckingham TA, Labovitz AJ, Redd RM (1989) The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 14: 499–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Camous JP, Raybaud F, Dolisi C, Schenowitz A, Varenne A, Baudouy MA (1993) Interatrial conduction in patients undergoing AV stimulation: effects of increasing right atrial stimulation rate. PACE 16: 2082–2086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinik EH, Dae MW, Cockrell J, Abbott JA, Shiller NB, Griffin JC (1991) Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 67: 148–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jutzy RV, Feenstra L, Pai R, Florio J, Bansal R, Aybar R, Levine PA ((1992) Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function. PACE 15: 1919–1922Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crepaz R, Pitsheider W, Zammarchi A, Erlicher A, Mautone A, Braito E (1991) Role of echo-doppler in programming of sequential pacemakers. Evaluation of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with normal or hypertrophic left ventricle. G Ital Cardiol 21: 975–982Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Modena MG, Rossi R, Mattiolo AV, Carcagni A, Mattioli G (1995) Short A-V delay interval improves filling in DDD pacing of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol [Special issue1: 152AGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowell R, Paul V, Morris-Thurgood J, Ilsley C (1994) Septal short AV delay pacing: additional haemodynamic improvements in heart failure, Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 4: 258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karpawich PP, Seema M (1995) Septal pacing improves single chamber-paced left ventricular function: a comparative evaluation with atrial and apical pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol [Special issue] 151AGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehta D, Gilmors S, Ward D et al (1989) Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise with dual chamber pacemaker: a noninvasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler. Br Heart J 61: 161–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antonini L, Montefoschi N, Greco S, Santini M (1994) Is prolonged 1st° AV block an indication for physiologic pacing? In: Santini M (ed) Progress in clinical pacing. Futura media services, Inc, Armonk, NY, pp 449–463Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Miyazaki N, Tochikubo O, Usui T, Kashiwagi M, Ishii M (1992) Diastolic mitral regurgitation in patients with first-degree atrioventricular block. PACE 15: 1927–1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Nihei T, Usui T, Kashiwagi M, Ishii M (1991) Relationship between diastolic mitral regurgitation and PQ intervals or cardiac function in patients implanted with DDD pacemakers. PACE 14: 1797–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brecker SJD, Xiao H, Sparrow J, Gibson DG (1992) Effects of dual-chamber pacing with short atrioventricular delay in dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 342: 1308–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seidelin PH, Jones GA, Boon NA (1992) Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophie cardiomyopathy without obstruction. Lancet 340: 369–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hochleitner M, Hortnagl H, Ng CK, Hortnagl H, Gsthnitzer F, Zechmann W (1990) Usefulness of physiologic dual-chamber pacing in drug-resistant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 66: 198–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kataoka H (1991) Hemodynamic effect of dual chamber pacing in a patient with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy: a case report. PACE 14: 1330–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Cazzin
    • 1
  • P. Golia
    • 1
  • C. Bonanno
    • 1
  • C. Lestuzzi
    • 1
  • V. Proietti
    • 1
  1. 1.Servizio di Cardiologia, Ospedale di PortogruaroPortogruaro-VeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations