What Do We Know Today About the Outcome of Vasovagal Syncope?
Sudden loss of consciousness is a dramatic and often very frightening event for both patients and their families. While syncope has a wide differential diagnosis, the development of tilt table tests over the past 10 years has shown us that most patients in the community with syncope probably faint because of one of several presentations of vasovagal syncope. A good grasp of the prognosis of the patient is necessary in order to determine whether therapy need be attempted, and whether it is successful. There are a number of variants of vasovagal syncope, and each may have their own prognosis. Before we consider the prognosis of vasovagal syncope, we will first review some of the variants of this disorder and also review our current diagnostic maneuvers.
KeywordsTilt Test Tilt Table Vasovagal Syncope Unexplained Syncope Actuarial Risk
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 8.Sheldon R (1994) Tilt table testing in the diagnosis and treatment of syncope. Cardiovasc Rev Rep 8–28Google Scholar
- 11.Brignole M, Menozzi C, Gianfranchi L, Bottoni N, Lolli G (1992) The clinical and prognostic significance of the asystolic response during the head-up tilt test. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 2: 109–113Google Scholar
- 16.Natale A, Biehl M, Banks B, Maglio C, Krebs A, BudziszewskiGoogle Scholar
- M, Koch K, Sra J (1994) Recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope without therapeutic interventions. Circulation 90: 1–54 (abstr)Google Scholar
- 17.Morillo CA, Zandri S, Klein GJ, Yee R (1994) Neurally mediated syncope: long-term follow-up of patients with and without pharmacological therapy. Circulation 90: 1–54 (abstr)Google Scholar
- 18.Sheldon RS, Rose S, Flanagan P, Koshman ML, Killam S (1994) Multivariate predictors of syncope recurrence in drug-free patients following a positive tilt table test. Circulation 90: I55 (abstr)Google Scholar
- 26.Linzer M, Pontinen M, Gold DT, Divine GW, Felder A, Brooks WB (1991) Impairment of physical and psychosocial function in recurrent syncope. J Clin Epidemiol 44: 10371043Google Scholar