Why double contrast barium enema?

  • Giorgio Cittadini


In 1976 an article by Margulis [1] published in the “Opinion” column of Radiology was entitled: “Is the double contrast examination of the colon the only acceptable radiographic examination?”. In this article the Author also asks the following question: “Does this mean that radiologists not performing a double-contrast examination as the only radiographic procedure are wrong?”.


Irritable Bowel Syndrome Colonic Polyp Double Contrast Barium Enema Sessile Polyp Anatomic Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Margulis AR (1976) Is the double-contrast examination of the colon the only acceptable radiographic examination? Radiology 119: 741–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gelfand DW, Ott DJ (1981) Single-vs. double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics. AJR 137: 523–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson CD, Carlson HC, Taylor WF et al (1983) Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: Sensitivity of double-and single-contrast studies. AJR 140: 1143–1149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ott DJ, Scharling ES, Chen YM et al (1989) Barium enema examination: Sensitivity in detecting colonic polyps and carcinomas. South Med J 82: 197–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ott DJ, Scharling ES, Chen YM et al (1989) Positive predictive value and post-test probability of diagnosis of colonic polyp on single-and double-contrast barium enema. AJR 153: 735–739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Roos A, Hermans J, Shaw PC et al (1985) Colon polyps and carcinomas: Prospective comparison of the single-and double-contrast examination in the same patients. Radiology 154: 11–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelfand DW, Chen YM, Ott DJ (1987) Detection of colonic polyps on single-contrast barium enema study: Emphasis on the elderly. Radiology 164: 333–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Ramquist NA (1980) Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination. Gastrointest Radiol 5: 99–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelvin FM, Gardiner R, Vas W et al (1981) Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception. AJR 137: 307–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markus JB, Somers S, O’Malley BP et al (1990) Double-contrast barium enema studies: Effect of multiple reading on perception error. Radiology 175: 155–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laufer I, Mullens JE, Hamilton J (1976) Correlation of endoscopy and double-contrast radiography in the early stages of ulcerative and granulomatous colitis. Radiology 118: 1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laufer I (1976) The double-contrast enema: myths and misconceptions. Gastrointest Radiol 1: 19–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelvin FM, Oddson TA, Rice RP et al (1978) Double contrast barium enema in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. AJR 131: 207–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakano H, Jaramillo E, Watanabe M et al (1992) Intestinal tuberculosis: Findings on double-contrast barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 17: 108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ritsema GH, Thijn CJP (1991) Painful irritable bowel syndrome and sigmoid contractions. Clin Radiol 43: 113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lappas JC, Maglinte DDT, Kopecky KK et al (1988) Diverticular disease: Imaging with post-double-contrast sigmoid flush. Radiology 168: 35–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpkins KC (1989) Annual Oration 1989: Bring out your barium. J Can Assoc Radiol 40: 5–11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bret P (1981) Radiologie de l’intestin grêle et du colon. Technique et sémiologie. Villeurbanne: SimepGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ushio K, Goto H, Muramatsu Y et al (1986) Significance of the profile view in the X-ray diagnosis of cancer of the digestive tract: Diagnosis of depth invasion by double contrast study. I to Cho 21: 27–32Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Margulis AR, Eisenberg RL (1991) Gastrointestinal radiology from the time of Walter B. Cannon to the 21st century. Radiology 178: 297–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rice RP (1990) Lowering death rates from colorectal cancer: Challenge for the 1990s. Radiology 176: 297–301PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Cittadini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Genoa School of Medicine San Martino HospitalGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations