Advertisement

The radiographic recording system

  • Giorgio Cittadini

Abstract

Since the first steps of the Genoa technique, fluoroscopy is used mainly to follow the progress of the barium suspension, and to control the gaseous distention of the colon. It is performed by specifically skilled radiologists or by residents under supervision, but never by radiographers, in spite of the fact that formal training may enable this form of role extension, the radiographer-performed barium enema [1]. From a diagnostie point ofview, the evaluation of standard overhead radiographs, eaeh of them supposed to display the whole colon, and, when obtained, of spot radiographs, is of paramount importanee. Therefore, particular attention was paid to the radiographic recording system with referenee to contrast, resolution and format.

Keywords

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Double Contrast Barium Enema Radiographic System Barium Suspension Spot Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bewell J, Chapman AH (1996) Radiographer-performed barium enemas—Results of a survey to assess progress. Radiography 2: 199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oggioni R (1979) Gli schermi alle terre rare. Radiol Med 65 (Suppl 2): 189–193Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castle JW (1977) Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation and its relationship to image contrast. Radiology 122: 805–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rollandi GA, Gambaro A, Pulzato P et al (1984) Utiliz-zazione di una pellicula a basso gradiente di contrasto nelle indagini a doppio contrasto del tubo digerente. Radiol Med 70(Suppl 4): 89–91Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cittadini G, Sardanelli F, De Cicco E et al (1998) A larger film format (16x20 inches) in double-contrast barium enema examination. Br J Radiol (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olson DL, Dodds WJ, Stewart ET et al (1987) Efficacy of an intracassette filter for improved pneumocolon decubitus radiographs. AJR 148: 547–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perri G, Palla L, Battolla L et al (1991) Clisma a doppio contrasto—Studio del disegno mucoso e del profilo d’organo con le metodiche tradizionale e digitale. Radiol Med 81: 844–848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okada Y, Kusano S, Endo T (1994) Double-contrast barium enema study with computed radiography: assessment in detection of colorectal polyps. J Digit Imaging 7: 154–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barkhof F, David E, De Geest F (1996) Comparison of film-screen combination and digital fluorography in gastrointestinal barium examinations in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol; 22: 232–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bellomi M, Severini A, Cozzi G et al (1994) La fluoroscopia digitale nella radiologia gastroenterologica. Radiol Med 87: 460–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kastan DJ, Ackerman LV, Feczko PJ (1987) Digital gastrointestinal imaging: The effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities. Radiology 162: 853–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krug B, Steinbrich W, Lorenz R et al (1990) Kolonkontrasteinlauf in digitaler lumineszenradiographie (DLR) und konventioneller röntgentechnik. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 152: 131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zonca G, Brusa A, Bellomi M et al (1995) Absorbed dose to the skin in radiological examinations of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Radiat Prot Dosim 57: 489–492Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Cittadini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Genoa School of Medicine San Martino HospitalGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations